Year End Review 2021

Well 2021 was rife with indecision, pontification and drama for Amherstburg town council. There were some highs, some lows and some in-betweens. The meetings were long…..and this blog will be too! LOL Other than one in-person meeting (which I did not attend in-person), all of the meetings were held virtually in 2021. The good news is that I could laugh (or yell) out loud at my computer…..the bad news is, some members of council thought they were actors and tried to put on a show for the viewers……Which led to my half joking title of “As Amherstburg Turns” in reference to the council meetings. I truly wonder how many people actually tuned in for the electronic meetings and in their entirety…..It takes some serious drive and determination, perhaps with a dash of wacky to make it through an entire council meeting. Anyway, here’s the year end review, in no particular order…..

Libro Centre Expansion Master Plan

In January 2021, the Libro Centre Expansion Master Plan was presented to council. It was a planning document for the future development of the park property at the Libro Centre. It was a detailed plan for the entire property that surrounds the arena but it did not include the arena complex itself. 

The plan was beautiful! The plan was detailed! The plan was created with vigorous (dare I say fulsome?) public consultation. The massive amount of acreage was planned out in order to properly place items and amenities as budget money became available. Nothing in the document was written in stone (that was explained numerous times that fateful night), however it was a guiding document to help plan the future development of the property. 

The first question that night was from Councillor Prue asking if the plan had to be adopted that very night. We were doomed. The plan never did get adopted. Councillor Courtney spent much of that meeting telling us all how many sports he played and therefore seemed to know what was best for the property and that his ideas did not agree with the plan that was being proposed by the consultants and town administration. Some members of council were concerned if the proposed pool and skate park should be located at the Libro Centre. 

After a very, very lengthy “debate”, Councillor Prue made a motion to approve the existing area for the ball diamond and the trail and leave the balance of the plan for later for council to feel more comfortable about it. (BTW, later never came…..) Councillor McArthur seconded the motion (that surprised me then and still surprises me now, since he had been the only one that spoke logically that January night about approving the plan….) and the motion passed. 

If we fail to plan, we plan to fail. This year, 2021 will be closing out and there is still no plan in place for our beautiful asset, the Libro Centre , and the massive amount of property that surrounds it. I guess nobody ever defined “later.” Maybe the next council will be stronger and better at planning and making decisions. 

Council’s inability to make a decision and adopt the plan that night would come back to haunt them more than once through 2021. 

Affordable Housing, Jack Purdie Park and Centennial Park

In February, council talked a good talk about the need for affordable housing. According to the report, there were 993 families on a waitlist for affordable housing. That evening, council made a motion to support an initiative for affordable housing in Amherstburg. Then, it came time for action. And that’s where council couldn’t walk the walk. 

Mayor DiCarlo declared a conflict on discussing either park due to the location of his home and the proximity to the parks. 

Next up, that same February night was a report about best uses for Jack Purdie Park. It was discovered that the park land is 11 acres. Council was very open to the idea of a hybrid approach for the use of Jack Purdie Park. In other words, to sell a portion of the property to be used for affordable housing and then to use the proceeds to develop the remaining park land. The motion passed unanimously simply to look at rezoning the land and explore this possibility. (The way that some residents threw misinformation around on social media about this would take another blog all its own.)

And then, a discussion about the best uses for Centennial Park……Every member of council had been open to possibly putting affordable housing on a portion of Jack Purdie Park, yet some members of council suddenly did not want affordable housing located in a portion of Centennial Park. Weird. It was established that the remaining acres of Centennial Park were simply not spacious enough for the park to become a sports park. There is just not enough space. This meeting got especially complicated since Councillor Courtney felt he only had a conflict for one motion about Centennial Park yet could vote on the other motion. 

First,  there was a recorded vote for Option 3:  The redevelopment of H. Murray Smith/Centennial Park as an Athletic (and Heritage) Park in accordance with the recommendations of the Council approved 2018 Parks Master Plan.

In favour: Councillor Courtney, Councillor Prue and Councillor Renaud

Opposed : Councillor McArthur, Deputy Mayor Meloche, Councillor Simone

Since it was a tie vote, the motion failed. (Remember the mayor did not vote since he had a conflict of pecuniary interest so he could not discuss the issue, nor vote on it.)

Councillor McArthur then made the motion for Option 4 : The rezoning of H. Murray Smith/Centennial Park in accordance with the highest and best use for the subject lands in accordance with the Town’s Official Plan for Housing First Policy.

He wanted to have wording for fundraising in the motion but I believe that was removed since the school board would have to fundraise if they want to build a track on their property. 

Councillor McArthur felt it was important to have a vision for the highest and best use for the land including green space. Councillor Simone seconded the motion. 

Another recorded vote :

In favour : Councillor McArthur, Deputy Mayor Meloche, Councillor Simone

Opposed : Councillors Prue and Renaud

The motion passed.

(Councillor Courtney couldn’t vote since he felt he had a conflict only for option 4.)

Councillor McArthur wrote an excellent blog about the possibilities for this land. I believe he is the only member of council who writes and communicates about council decisions,  even though others promised to do so during their election campaigns. Here is the link to his blog, if you’re looking for a refresher or for factual information about the parks : https://www.donaldmcarthur.com/amherstburg_council_votes_to_engage_public_explore_options_for_centennial_jack_purdie_parks

Both parks were discussed several more times throughout 2021. In the summer, the proposals were presented to council. There were various proposals with various amenities and various types of affordable housing. The public was consulted, but ultimately nothing was decided. 

In the fall, a report about Centennial Park was found in a box in the former CAO’s office. (I wonder if it was found with the Libro Expansion Plan that council had shelved in January? Maybe they were keeping each other company?) Either way, the report was dated June 2020 and didn’t end up in front of council until November 2021.That was odd. Here is a link to the report for those who are interested : https://pub-amherstburg.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=4766

The report does recommend medium density residential for the property but as I’ve learned through the years…..the recommendations don’t matter, until they matter. LOL! Some members of council will disregard or argue against recommendations because, well I guess they feel they know best…..and I guess that’s probably why not much got accomplished in 2021 by council. 

March 6th 2021

This was an awful day for Amherstburg. All four tires of the Mayor’s car were slashed in his driveway while his family slept. Not only were his four tires slashed, the four tires of his daughter’s car were slashed as well. His wife’s car was in the garage…would hers have been targeted too if it had been parked in the driveway?  I don’t want to relive that day and rehash it all but it could not go without mentioning this horrible act in this year end blog. Here is the link to the special edition blog I wrote about this issue at the time, if you are so inclined to reread it. I prefer not to. https://amherstburg2.wordpress.com/2021/03/06/special-edition-blog-when-on-line-bullying-leads-to-vandalism/

Mass Vaccination Clinic

One very good thing to come out of 2021 was that our beautiful Libro Centre was chosen as a Mass Vaccination Clinic site. The site would administer almost 39,000 vaccines against COVID-19! That was very exciting news for Amherstburg! 

Open Air Weekends

Ahhhhhh…..Open Air weekends! Where the streets were alive with people, fun and friendship! The people loved Open Air! Well, most of them do anyway. This forward-thinking initiative was debated multiple times during 2021. Too many times really. The hours were modified for 2021, with the streets closing to traffic Friday afternoon, reopening to traffic Saturday throughout the day and then closing to traffic again Saturday evening and all day Sunday. The footprint was also modified from the 2020 footprint. Compromise was made to try to keep those who did not like Open Air happy. It didn’t work LOL. 

Open Air was hotly contested by a few as others were vocally supporting it with quantitative data. Those who sought (and received) compromise in the spring of 2021, came back in the fall seeking more compromise. 

THRIVE, a new lobbyist group, wrote a White Paper supporting Open Air Weekends. Here is the link to their research for those who are interested : https://pub-amherstburg.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=4356

At year end, a report from administration recommended that Open Air continue but with the hours of operation used in 2020 (streets open to pedestrians from Friday night through to Sunday night) as well as a new, modified footprint, freeing up parking on the street on Dalhousie Street from Richmond to Rankin. 

Open Air was debated at length on November 22nd when a final report was provided to council. For anyone that knows me or follows the blog, you know that I am a huge supporter of Open Air! I am going to quote myself from the blog that I wrote up about the November 22nd meeting :

“And then Councillor Courtney spoke…..and spoke….and spoke….(5 pages worth of speaking…..) get ready…..and I’m going into detail here…..

Councillor Courtney started out by saying he likes to talk and that he’s very opinionated. He felt that Open Air has been very controversial and contentious. He felt that Open Air was created to help businesses through the pandemic. He felt that Open Air was not a special event and that it really isn’t “special”. He felt that River Lights and The Uncommon Festival were the only weekends that were awesome. Councillor Courtney did feel that Open Air created hype for year one but that the novelty wore off for year two. He felt that it had simply become about having a burger or a beer in the street. (Oh my…..that comment alone screamed that it was said by someone who did not attend Open Air! Open Air is about so much more than having a burger or a beer in the street! It’s about community. It’s about togetherness. It’s about inclusivity. It’s about fun. It’s about walkability. It’s about family and friends…..In fact when the Who’s down in Whoville wanted to make Christmas celebrations bigger and brighter, the Grinch tried to stop Christmas from coming! And the Grinch learned that Christmas is about “more” than presents, food, decorations and money. Well, Open Air is about A LOT more than a burger or a beer in the street!)

Councillor Courtney asked Ms Rota if it were true that only 21 businesses responded to the survey since the turnaround time was less than 48 hours to fill out the survey. Ms Rota said that all of the businesses knew the survey was coming and that they had 4 or 5 full days to fill it out. 

Councillor Courtney then said that Open Air was for the culinary businesses. He did not feel that the BookStore needed Open Air, that the banks needed Open Air or that clothing stores needed Open Air.  He felt that council was being asked to help some and hurt others…..(um…..it’s been three years and he hasn’t yet realized that every decision they make is for the betterment of some and to the detriment of others? BIG PICTURE time! Decisions need to be made based on the big picture and for the town as a whole…..) 

Ms Rota explained that it may appear that 4 or 5 restaurants are benefitting but that council must look at the bigger picture….people picnicking in the park, making purchases, performers and musicians were hired etc. She reminded council that for that night, the recommendation was simply to approve the footprint and that later the budget portion would be debated. She felt that the event would likely be cost neutral next year and that grants were available. 

Ms Baillargeon, Director of Parks and Culture explained that Open Air is more than an event, it’s an initiative. (Could Ms Baillargeon make Councillor Courtney’s heart grow two sizes bigger at this meeting?)

Didn’t seem so. Councillor Courtney went on and on about investing in tourism and he felt that council may be crossing that line and that he hoped they wouldn’t get sued if businesses are losing money. (Yes, seriously. He said that…..) He felt that the number one concern should be the business owners. (And once again BIG PICTURE! Open Air is NOT all about the business owners….I spend a lot of money at those businesses, gladly! Open Air is about ALL OF US! It’s about the residents, the tourists and the business owners. The business owners do not own our downtown, it belongs to all of us. Every single one of us that pays taxes in Amherstburg owns a piece of our downtown and our streets.)

Councillor Courtney felt that streets are for cars, sidewalks are for pedestrians and the parks are to play in. I guess,in a very narrow scope type of way of looking at things, he may have a point…..but there’s a much bigger picture at play….The BIG picture! 

Finally, Councillor McArthur made the motion to approve the Open Air plan for 2022 in principle. Councillor Prue asked to extend it for one more week in September in order to allow the involvement of the aboriginal peoples to celebrate the September 30th holiday. (The National Day of Truth and Reconciliation) 

So the motion was read, some slight amendments were made for sound and to extend Open Air for one extra weekend in September. It went to a recorded vote (I love those)

Support : Councillor McArthur, Councillor Prue, Councillor Renaud, Councillor Simone, Deputy Mayor Meloche and Mayor DiCarlo

Opposed : Councillor Courtney

So, all the Who’s in Whoville will have Christmas! And the people of Amherstburg will have Open Air! Because, yes, it really does mean a little bit more……”

There you have it folks. Open Air was supported 6 – 1. Done. Or is it? Will the few that don’t like Open Air be back to contest it once again? Will council see that other municipalities saw our success these past two years and some are trying to emulate us? 

The Skate Park

Oh boy, the skate park. So, the Libro Centre Expansion Plan (the one that council did not adopt in January) recommended that the skate park be placed at the Libro Centre. But, at that fateful January meeting, council decided they wanted more input into where to place the skate park. In June, there was a recommendation to temporarily locate the skate park at the Community Hub (320 Richmond Street). This was debated at length by council. Councillor McArthur spoke fiercely to get the skate park set up ASAP, since the kids had been without a skate park and summer was right around the corner. Ultimately, a motion was made to waive the procurement policy so that the CAO could get the area paved and the skate park could be up and running in about a week’s time. Had council gone through the whole process it would have taken at least 6 or 8 weeks to get the skate park installed. This might have been the first and only time all year that council actually made a decision and moved on an issue in short order. 

Unfortunately, there were a lot of problems at the temporary location for the skate park. In December, a report about vandalism, threats and harassment came before council. The skate park had already been removed, but a permanent location had to be decided upon. The recommendation was, once again, to place the Skate Park at the Libro Centre. The debate raged on and on. A couple of councillors were somewhat rude to Ms Baillargeon, Director of Community and Protective Services. Councillor Prue felt that she shouldn’t use the word “fulsome” and Councillor Courtney continued to express that he felt that the north end of Centennial Park would be a better choice than Ms Baillargeon’s recommendation. Ironically, Councillor Courtney cited a survey that was done by the town. It seems that 24 people wanted the skate park at Centennial and 21 people voted for the Libro location. I think the fact that any weight is given to a survey that was filled out by 45 people in a town of 22,000 residents shows why this council has been largely unproductive. They don’t seem to understand that they were elected to do the right thing and make decisions for the town as a whole. Every. Single. Time. Too much time got wasted these past 3 years as certain councillors listened to a small group of loud voices. I wonder if they’ve learned their lesson?

Ultimately, the motion did carry. The skatepark will find its permanent home at the Libro Centre. (Now if only council could dust off that Libro Master Plan that they set aside….get it approved, so that they can start planning and budgeting for some amenities…..and for those who want a pool, yes, there was a pool in the plan that council tossed aside…..)

Did you know that Councillor Prue used to be the Mayor of East York and a Member of Provincial Parliament?

I should have kept a count on how often Councillor Prue reminded us about that. It was a lot. Often, it seemed he mentioned this fact at least once per meeting…..The highlight of the year was when Councillor Prue shared a story about how when he was Mayor of East York, they waived the RFP process to purchase computers. It seems it didn’t work out well. Councillor McArthur expressed that night what we’ve all been thinking…..nobody cares what happened in Toronto 20 years ago…..

Ballot Question –  Wards

Oh wait, council did come up with one item during their term. The issue of wards will be rehashed. Again. There will be a question on the ballot in 2022 asking if Amherstburg should change to a ward system. More time wasted looking into the past rather than looking to the future. 

The Miracle Drive June 27th

And some positive news!!! Once again, the people of Amherstburg stepped up and helped out! This year’s Miracle Drive to collect food and non-perishable items for families in need was a huge success. The night of the June 28th meeting, two delegates spoke to council directly from the gym at Western Secondary. They thanked CAO Miceli (still CAO at that time) for making himself available to help and helping to secure the Western Secondary location as a depot for all of the goods. The delegates thanked Mayor DiCarlo for staying all day as well as Deputy Mayor Meloche, Councillor Simone, Councillor McArthur and Councillor Renaud. 

August 9th 2021 – The day it all changed (and the day that – sadly – some people of Amherstburg had been waiting for….)

August 9th was the start of months of turmoil in town hall. On that day, John Miceli (CAO), Cheryl Horrobin (Director of Corporate Services) and Nicole Rubli (Director of Planning and Development Services) were walked out of town hall with police presence. There were numerous articles in the media, but very few details were released. The new town lawyer, Susan Hirrota stepped in as acting CAO. A few weeks later, she was gone to work for the Town of Kingsville, since, well, she got a better offer. 

Word got out…..Amherstburg town hall was in turmoil. Other municipalities swooped in with job offers. Over the next few months, our municipality lost our Treasurer (Justin Rousseau), our Clerk (Paula Parker) and the Director of Human Resources ( Michelle Rose).  As well, the Executive Assistant to the CAO & Mayor (Dawn Morencie) also left.  Following these departures, here’s the link to a Special Edition blog that I wrote in October, if you’re interested : https://amherstburg2.wordpress.com/2021/10/02/special-edition-blog-town-hall-turmoil/

But the change in staff wasn’t over. There was a new Treasurer appointed and he left after one meeting. It was recently announced that Mr Rick Daly, Manager of Recreation Services is also leaving. I’m not sure if I’ve forgotten anybody…..it’s hard to keep track. Council brought in Mr Tony Haddad as interim CAO. As well, Ms Valerie Critchley is acting Clerk. We’ll have to wait and see what 2022 holds in terms of staff departures and new hires. 

Fire Station Options

The Fire Chief presented some options to council in regards to the future and our fire halls. It was up to council to show leadership and choose the priorities and the direction in which they wanted Amherstburg to go. I read the report and listened to the Fire Chief during that September meeting and it was crystal clear that our fire stations need to be updated to get with the times. It’s pretty sad that they can’t hold a new fire truck because they were built so long ago and they’re just plain too small. Much like our hospitals, things need updating and renewal. And yes, these things cost money. But it all has to start with a plan so that money can be budgeted accordingly. 

As usual, there was flipping and flopping and it was said more than once “IF” a decision were to be made that night……again, it shone bright how indecisive this council is. The indecisiveness has led to more inefficient meetings where nothing gets accomplished than I can keep track of.

FINALLY Deputy Mayor Meloche made the motion to proceed with Option A (two fire stations – see below). He wondered if one could be done and then do the second one later. Chief Montone said that he did not want to bring forward a plan that was not realistic. He said he would bring back a doable, realistic plan and consider the impact on the taxpayer. Councillor Simone seconded the motion.

In Support : Councillor McArthur, Deputy Mayor Meloche, Councillors Renaud and Simone, Mayor Dicarlo

Opposed : Councillors Courtney and Prue

In the above-noted recorded vote, council adopted the following option : 

Option A – Two Fire Station Model

“This option includes: 

Construction of two new fire stations, based on consolidation of fire stations 1 and 3, with:

  • demolition and reconstruction of fire station 2 at its current location;
  • decommissioning of fire station 3, which could be repurposed by the Town or disposed of;
  • construction of a new fire station at the Amherstburg Libro Centre (Libro) site; and,
  • discontinued operations at the current fire station 1 facility, which could be repurposed by the Town or disposed of if the municipal office were relocated. 
  • Redeployment of staff and equipment between the two new stations, with thirty (30) VFFs deployed from each site and relocation of full-time fire fighters to the fire station at the Libro site.

The relocation of existing full time firefighters to the new fire station on the Libro site would complete the improvement of response capabilities utilizing existing resources. The Town’s ability to meet at least the lower effective response level for emergencies occurring in high risk and extreme risk occupancies, as identified earlier in this report and improving the level of guaranteed response to the whole municipality may result.”

No Treasurer, no budget

Usually, council receives and debates the budget in November. Then the budget gets adopted in December. Well, this year, with the revolving door of senior staff, it would be virtually impossible to have had a budget in place before the end of 2021. CAO Haddad presented a new timeline and a new format to council for 2022. 

The proposed budget will be presented and debated in January 2022, with an adoption of the budget in February. But the BIG CHANGE??? The budget will not be a line by line document. Rather, it will be a big picture proposal so that council can decide where they want to spend money and which priorities they want to focus on. This oughta be interesting. Clearly, Mr Haddad is new to town…..LOL! This council is not very “big picture” oriented…..hence, the marathon meetings discussing minutia, beating horses that died years ago and chasing ghosts of Amherstburg past. This budget oughta be interesting!

New and Private Investment

While council was busy looking backwards, fortunately Amherstburg had private investors looking to our future. They were busily spending money in our town on development, buildings and new business ventures. The new hotel on Dalhousie Street is a go and an operator was chosen. The buildings beside River Bookshop are being renovated as I write this blog and will house commercial stores on the main floor and apartments above. The Panetteria (the bakery behind the River Bookshop) has opened in what is basically a brand new and completely restored building. The property at 247 Brock Street (former St. Anthony’s School / House of Shalom) has development well underway. The plans were presented to the Heritage Committee and to council and the development of condos in that building is proceeding. As well, the Heritage Committee has endorsed plans for the building at the northwest corner of Murray Street and Ramsay Street (former 2-Way Automotive). Sounds like this property will include retail and restaurant space as well as a boutique hotel/Airbnb upstairs. I have also heard that there are plans in the works for the building across the street from this one. As well, it seems that some plans are in the works for the former Post Office. I can only imagine that multi-millions of dollars are being invested by these entrepreneurs. This is good news, this is FANTASTIC news! 

Oh and the construction of the new high school is well underway. I know that’s not private investment but rather a school board and provincial government investment, but it’s progress! And I like to see progress and forward momentum!

Last but not least, the audit – let the witch hunt begin

At the final December meeting, Councillor Courtney presented his motion (it was seconded by Councillor Prue) :

1. That Council AUTHORIZE the Town’s audit services provider, KPMG, to UNDERTAKE an audit review of the following items:

a) Internal Controls in place at the Town;

b) Operating Budget Variances that have occurred for the fiscal years 2018-2021; and

c) Capital Projects completed and/or underway for fiscal years 2018-2021 with a project value greater than $300,000, including the development of the 320 Richmond Street Hub Project;

2. That Council AUTHORIZE the CAO to sign all the necessary documents required to undertake the noted work;

3. That KPMG’s findings resulting from this engagement BE REPORTED to Council in accordance with the Municipal Act;

4. That, should the work done by KPMG as authorized by this resolution result in the need for further investigation, that KPMG report on the same to Council for its consideration; and

5. That the cost of this engagement be charged to CAO’s Office – Professional Services.

CAO Haddad explained that this audit could cost anywhere from $20,000 to hundreds of thousands of dollars. It would depend on the scope that council chose. Most of council felt that likely nothing would be found amiss. Yet they seemed to want to proceed anyway. They seemed to feel that there had been a lot going on in town hall, and that this audit would allow for some transparency. But this was the most interesting part…..and again, I quote from my blog of December 13th : 

“Councillor Prue felt that the amount of money was not a big issue. He felt that $250,000 is 1% of the tax rate. He felt that it is worth 1% to let the public know and that it would be good for the people of this town. He felt that he wanted answers about things found in a box as well as the Hub. (This kind of made me chuckle…..suddenly 1% of the tax rate is A-OK. Until budget time when it’s slash and burn time…..Can’t have it both ways……no problem spending $250,000 for an audit that everyone on council seems to agree won’t show anything…..)

(And here’s my personal take…….IF, big IF…..the reasons for the three employees being let go in August were financial…..this motion would have been hot off the press by September 1st at the latest…..it wouldn’t have taken 4 months to get to it…..which leads me to believe that this is just for “optics” sake…..we’re going to spend all kinds of money to do an audit, that members of council were all saying likely won’t find anything amiss…..which means that they know that the August fiasco wasn’t financial…..they’re privy to the in-camera info…..if it were financial, they would know…..but I guess we will all sit back and wait and see…..and if the audit is clean? Will the public accept that? Or will the rumours simply continue on in true Amherstburg form for the next decade or two?

I find it very telling that the last meeting of 2021 tied right into the big mistake of one of the first meetings of 2021, not adopting the Libro Master Plan. But really, it’s not about the plan. It’s about the big picture. Council couldn’t look at the big picture of the Libro facility and begin to plan for the massive space that we have there. By not planning, there’s no budget dollars being set aside to start the process of building amenities. 

And rather than look forward to 2022 and begin to plan…..council decided instead to look in the rearview mirror and chase ghosts of CAOs past. Councillor Prue sees no issue with spending 1% of the tax rate for an audit? Where is the plan for our future? Both short-term and long-term future? Do we even have one? We won’t, as long as council’s priorities are about chasing ghosts.

2022 Election Year

And October 2022 will see a municipal election with a new council. What that will bring nobody knows. One Mayoral hopeful (Bob Rozankovic) has already announced his candidacy. I had high hopes for the current council when they were elected in 2018. The majority seemed positive and forward-thinking. I’m not sure if they got dragged down by social media, got led astray by a sly fox or just started listening too much to the very vocal minority. Either way, it’s unfortunate, I think so much more could have been accomplished in the last three years. I am going to guess that the next 6 months, it will be a race to try to get something done so that those who want to run again will have something (anything) on which to hang their hat. At least that will be more interesting to watch than the race to the bottom that I’ve been watching. 

Conclusion

Well, if you made it to the end here, congratulations! I know this was a long one! I tried to cover as many highlights as I could. I hope I thought of most of them. Whether you agreed with every word, some of the words or none of the words, thank you for reading! Happy New Year! And for those of you who get my humour (or sarcasm at times), a double thank you for reading! 🙂 See you on the flip side Amherstburg!

Monday December 13th Regular town council meeting

Monday night’s meeting was brought to you by the letters P and F and the numbers two and four. The “P” is for pontification and posturing which were plentiful. The letter “F” is for the word ‘fulsome”. The number two is for the motions that could not get seconders and the number four is because, well, four votes matter. 

The meeting lasted four and a half hours, so this blog is going to be a long one…..

I’m going to try to focus on the big picture……here’s the summary :

First, council met in-camera at 4:30 to discuss : 

Council is scheduled to meet in-camera at 4:30 to discuss : 

SPECIAL IN-CAMERA MEETING

That Council move into an In-Camera Meeting of Council pursuant to Section 239 of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended for the following reasons:

Item A – Section 239(2)(c) – A proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the municipality. 

Item B – Section 239(2)(k) – A position plan, procedure, criteria or instruction to be applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the municipality or local board.

Item C – Section 239(2)(c) – A proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the municipality. Section 239(2)(k) – A position plan, procedure, criteria or instruction to be applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the municipality or local board. 

The meeting started shortly after 6:00. I was a little late getting connected and the Mayor was declaring a conflict of interest about the Skate Park and Councillor Courtney said he may need to declare a conflict about the property at 300 Victoria Street. 

Councillor Courtney was not physically in council chambers. He was on a zoom call and looked to be possibly at work? I’m not sure. 

First up, there was a request to defer the following item: 

Alma Street Watermain Improvement Detailed Design and Tendering Services – Memorandum of Understanding for Funding and Engineering Agreement 

It seems that the residents have a proposal regarding the above item that they want to propose to town administration. There was a motion made to defer it and it passed. 

DELEGATIONS

Italian Heritage Monument Fundraising Committee – Remo DiPaolo and Domenic Cristofaro (delegation)

The Italian Heritage Monument Project (report)

There was a delegation regarding the Italian Heritage Monument Project so that report was also moved up on the agenda. 

Mr Cristofaro and Mr DiPaolo addressed council first. They spoke of being first generation Italians that were born and raised in Amherstburg. He spoke about immigrants coming to Canada with a desire to find a better future. The project that they are proposing would depict the hard work of immigrants and their pride to become Canadians. They were asking council to approve the location of the monument in the Kings Navy Yard Park. They have found an artist to create the sculpture. They felt that the sculpture could be a cultural piece that would contribute to our heritage and how Canada and our area has benefitted from immigrants. There will be a small-scale model made to help spur donations. The delegates expressed confidence that they would be able to raise the funds and that they needed council approval for the location. 

Councillor Prue had many questions for town administration. He asked a bunch of questions about the proposed account that the town would create to accept donations and issue receipts on behalf of the monument fundraising committee. It was explained that the information would be public (who donated and the amounts) and would be reported to the fundraising committee. Then Councillor Prue questioned the site location depicted near the water. He felt that the majority of immigrants did not arrive to this area by use of the waterways but rather they were driven from Windsor. (Was this for real? Really? Unfortunately it was….) Ms Baillargeon, Director of Parks and Recreation replied that it was meant to set the stage that immigrants came by boat to Canada, not necessarily this area. Councillor Prue then questioned an item in the motion about the location and if the Heritage Committee would be consulted. (short answer, yes). 

Then Deputy Mayor Meloche started with his grocery list of questions about the trust account and if tax receipts would be issued. Then there were questions about if a specific location had to be chosen now and if the Heritage Committee would have to also approve the location. 

Councillor McArthur then spoke and felt that they were inventing problems that didn’t exist. (LOL! Um, council are experts at this! That’s probably why nothing has gotten done in the past three years…..too much dithering and hand wringing with litanies of “what ifs”.….) Councillor McArthur felt that council should approve the project and that it was a great idea. 

Then, in case anybody forgot, Councillor Prue mentioned that this was an excellent project and that he was part of one when he was the Mayor of East York. 

And even though he had a dozen “questions” or more about this project, Councillor Prue made the motion as recommended by administration and Councillor McArthur seconded it. Here’s the entire motion : 

It is recommended that:

1. Council APPROVE IN PRINCIPLE the proposed Italian Heritage Monument Project on behalf of the Italian Heritage Monument Fundraising Committee provided the committee raise the funding for the project in its entirety as noted in the report of November 25, 2021. 

2. Council APPROVE IN PRINCIPLE the proposed location of the monument in Kings Navy Yard Park as per Appendix A.

3. Council APPROVE that Administration work with the Italian Heritage Monument Fundraising Committee on the following initiatives:

a. Develop an agreement between the Town of Amherstburg and the Italian Heritage Fundraising Committee for scope of work, creation of the sculpture, the roles and responsibilities of the committee and the Town including the ultimate transference of ownership of the sculpture and other rights to the Town of Amherstburg.

b. Develop a maintenance Trust Fund to be utilized for future maintenance and repairs.

c. The Financial Services Division set up an account for the Italian Heritage Monument to accept all fundraising and donations on behalf of the Italian Heritage Committee and issue tax receipts for donor contributions.

d. Ensure the monument meets or exceeds current construction and material standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Parks, Recreation, Facilities and Culture and that the project meet all obligations covered under the Town’s Memorial Policy (currently under review).

e. That the Heritage Committee be consulted on the location of the monument in the King’s Navy Yard Park in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act. 

4. Council DIRECT Administration to bring back a detailed report that outlines the full scope of the project, including all costs associated with the project and any long term financial commitments of the Town prior to commencement of work on site. 

It passed. 

Health and Safety Concerns at 320 Richmond Community Hub – Robert Moroz (delegation)

320 Richmond St. (HUB) – Health and Safety Issues (report)

This delegation also had an accompanying report, which was moved up on the agenda. Mr Moroz addressed council first. He explained how the new Community Hub was a beautiful building and very well renovated. The organizations there provide service to a wide range of people. However, lately, he said that there have been concerns that are a threat to operations at the Hub. He felt that people feel threatened to come into the building with kids saying threatening things to staff or residents. He said that there are concerns that some people that may need health care at the Nurse Practitioners clinic won’t come to the clinic due to fear of the threats. He also felt that the problems were calling into question people’s privacy with people looking into windows. Mr Moroz also said there were concerns for staff and that they must keep their staff safe. Youth have been found roaming the building, knocking on windows, even fires have been set. He said that the police and town administration had been very responsive and quick to act. He had met with town administrators and was very pleased with the meeting and the potential solutions. Mr Moroz said that he highly recommended and supported town administrations recommendations regarding improving security at the Hub. 

Just for reference, here is the recommendation :

It is recommended that: 1. That Council APPROVE a one-time emergency expenditure in the amount of $36,000 to cover the cost of cameras, automatic door swipe card access, improved lighting and a security guard for a 2 month period in order to improve safety and security at 320 Richmond in accordance with the report dated November 25, 2021.

First, Councillor Prue felt it necessary to point out a mistake in wording in the report. (And we wonder why senior staff are leaving Amherstburg to go work elsewhere…..) 

Councillor Renaud asked how the security cameras would be monitored. 

Once again, Deputy Mayor Meloche pulled out a list of questions/comments. He felt that he was looking at the Hub from a business perspective and that the town is the landlord. However, when the skate park was installed there, the town became a tenant as well. He wanted to understand what the towns liabilities and responsibilities are in regards to being a landlord. He wondered if leases should be renegotiated since the areas had been leased for compensation. Ms Baillargeon pointed out that the town owns and is also responsible for the public areas in the building, such as washrooms, hallways and all common spaces. 

Councillor McArthur felt that they had no choice as the landlord but to act to improve the security of the building. He felt that it should be appreciated that the Hub is filled with vital and compassionate organizations and that council should not just look at this building as business landlords. (Someone gets it! The town is in the business of providing services, not making money like a business……but I digress.)

Councillor McArthur then made the motion (as recommended above) and Councillor Simone seconded it. 

But…..this was not over. Not by a long shot. There was still more posturing and pontificating to be done!

Councillor Courtney then spoke via zoom. He felt that he liked the idea of the cameras and external lighting since those would be assets for the building. But he felt that hiring a security guard would be a knee jerk reaction. He felt he had heard about the vandalism but that he hadn’t heard that charges had been laid or heard of any assaults. He felt that the Hub was starting to cost more and that profits were being lost. He said that he did not support spending $36,000. He wanted a compromise and to purchase the lights and cameras only. Councillor Courtney felt that since the skateboard park was gone now, that he wasn’t sure that the problems would continue. 

Mr Moroz spoke and said that things are not shangrila now that the skatepark is gone. He said that things were still not good, there was forceful entry and people were being threatened. 

Mayor DiCarlo asked Councillor McArthur if he’d be willing to amend the motion with Councillor Courtney’s proposal of only adding lighting and cameras. Councillor McArthur declined. He said he felt comfortable with the motion as is. 

Deputy Mayor Meloche expressed that he was not in favour of having security staff on site. 

Councillor Prue wanted to make a motion to divide the 4 items into separate motions and that everyone could vote on each individual item. He felt that a security guard does not give the right message and that it creates ill-will. 

The Clerk, Ms Critchley explained that they were all written in the same motion, that the motion would have to fail and then they could rewrite the motion with each individual item. (Interesting that Councillor Prue didn’t argue with her……she’s a lawyer too I believe…..he’s done fancy footwork with friendly amendments and dividing motions in the past…..)

Mayor DiCarlo said that the long-term plan is to have customer service in the building. He felt that without a security officer, that the burden would be on the tenants to sweep the building. 

There was EXTENSIVE back and forth about having customer service VS a security guard. Finally CAO Haddad said that they were getting into the weeds on operational matters. (LOL! Yup, welcome to Amherstburg town council…..get caught up in minutia and forget the big picture…..) He explained that a security guard was recommended and that having a customer service representative was more like having a concierge service. He felt that a full time concierge would have long term cost and was cautioning council on getting involved on staffing issues. Councillor Courtney expressed his agreement and asked what was the CAO’s recommendation. (Geez…..the recommendation is in the report that you were supposed to read! They recommended a security guard! As well as lighting, cameras and swipe cards…..)

Finally, Councillor McArthur had had enough. He pointed out that the motion is temporary, in terms of having security on site. It’s only for a few months. And then, Councillor McArthur called the vote! (I may have cheered a little bit at home. The merry go round ride had gone on far too long. It was starting to get a little bit nauseating…..)

So, the Mayor had to call the vote, and low and behold it passed. 

It was now 7:16 in my notes. More than an hour in and only two delegations had been dealt with. 

247 Brock Street, St. Anthony’s School, Heritage Designation and Proposed Alterations – Rosati Group (delegation)

Heritage Designation of 247 Brock Street and Proposed Alterations to the Heritage Attributes (report)

Again, there was a delegation and also a report with some recommendations about this item too. 

Ms Lassaline spoke first. She explained that the building at 247 Brock Street is an iconic limestone building. It would have 16 residential units. An elevator will also be installed. The proposal has been presented to the Heritage Committee and the changes were supported. She said that the final look and material for the elevator would come back to the Heritage Committee and to council for approval. She said that other changes, such as windows etc had been supported. (Here is a link to the drawings for anybody who hasn’t seen them. Absolutely beautiful! https://pub-amherstburg.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=5093 )

Councillor Prue shared his opinion that he was not keen on the elevator. He felt that the structure for the elevator was large and taller than the building. The delegation explained that it was an elevator and a secondary stairwell. Councillor Prue wondered if it could be made smaller and felt he wanted to see it shaved. Councillor Prue also questioned the garage and the materials that would be used……Deputy Mayor Meloche wondered why it was only a 10 car garage and that the rest of the parking would be outside……(what’s that saying about looking a gift horse in the mouth?…..someone needs to share that with these two…..)

Finally, after the other members of council expressed brief complimentary comments, the motion was made to approve it all and it carried. Here is the recommendation that passed : 

It is recommended that: 

1. Council DESIGNATE the “St. Anthony School” at 247 Brock Street by municipal bylaw under Part IV the Ontario Heritage Act.

2. Council APPROVE the proposed alterations to the Heritage Attributes of the St. Anthony School as recommended in Attachment 4, and per the Proponent’s concept drawings (Attachments 2 and 3), except the proposed finishes to the rear addition and replacement of the three doorway fanlights 

3. Council RECEIVE an alteration request for the finish of the new addition to the St. Anthony School building at a future date, and upon further collaboration between the Proponent, staff and the Heritage Committee. 

CWATS Overview Presentation – Diana Radulescu, Jerry Behl and Todd Hewitt

CWATS (County-wide Active Transportation System) presented to council. It looked like they had a few proposed changes and updates as well as some new routes to be developed. 

I’m going to save myself some time and keystrokes. Here’s the link to their presentation for anybody that is interested.  https://pub-amherstburg.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=5043

Adoption of the 2021 Multi-Year Accessibility Plan – Amherstburg Accessibility Advisory Committee Chair Shirley Curson-Prue (delegation)

2021 Multi-Year Accessibility Plan and Strategy (report)

Once again, there was a delegation and a report from administration. Ms Curson-Prue read a statement into the record. There was some discussion. 

Here’s the recommendation:

It is recommended that: 1. The Town of Amherstburg ADOPT the 2021 Multi-Year Accessibility Plan in accordance with Ontario Regulation 191/11 section 4(1), as supported by the Amherstburg Accessibility Advisory Committee. 

Finally, it passed. 

RECESS – At 8:11 Council took a 10 minute recess. 

Skate Park Update

Here is town administration’s recommendation regarding the skate park.  

It is recommended that:

1. Council APPROVE the Skate Park be moved permanently to the Libro Complex in the northwest corner of the property located at 3295 Meloche Road.

2. Council DIRECT Administration to proceed with issuing an RFP to retain a specialized consulting design firm to prepare design drawings for a multi versatile Skate Park facility at the Libro Complex based on the most recent survey that closed December 6, 2021.

3. Council APPROVE funding from the Parks Capital Reserve Fund in the amount of $75,000 for retaining a specialized Skate Park design consultant to prepare design and construction drawings suitable for tender for the new multi versatile Skate Park.

4. Funding for the construction of the Skate Park be DEFFERED to the 2022 capital budget deliberations

Mayor DiCarlo declared a conflict of interest and Deputy Mayor Meloche chaired this portion of the meeting. 

Councillor McArthur came right out of the gate and made the motion (as above) regarding the skate park. Councillor Simone seconded it. 

Councillor Prue felt uncomfortable about the RFP to create the design. He wondered what would happen at budget time should council decide to spend money on different or other amenities. Ms Baillargeon explained that it will be up to council to decide if the skate park is a priority for the community. She felt that at bare minimum there could be a pad at the facility and have something for the kids to use. At some point while she spoke she used the word “fulsome”. Councillor Prue seemed to then call her out for using this word and felt that it meant excessively exaggerated. (And again, we wonder why senior staff are leaving?…..their choice of words has to be publicly criticized by a councillor?…..unbelievable….not to mention what a big waste of time…..and to what purpose?.…) The two had a lengthy back and forth about design and how to go through the process. Councillor Prue felt that the Libro Centre was a compelling argument for the skate park location but that a bare majority of people had chosen Centennial Park for its location. He wondered why they should go around the public’s will. Ms Baillargeon explained that it was her opinion as the department head that they had looked at the design, all of the variables and all of the angles and that ultimately the Libro Centre was the best possible location. She explained that that was administration’s professional opinion. 

Councillor McArthur then spoke that he also used a thesaurus and that “fulsome” can also mean generous or abundant. (Glad someone spoke up to defend our town staff when someone tries to nitpick on them in a public meeting.) He felt that it was clear and decisive to put the skate park at the Libro and that it was a no brainer. There was parking, drainage, washrooms etc. Ms Baillargeon also pointed out that when the new fire station goes in there will be 24/7 surveillance and the skate park would be a highly visible and prominent area. She pointed out the access to hydro, water and other necessities. Ms Baillargeon also noted that this was the location recommended in the Libro Master Plan. (Remember that plan council? The one presented last January? The one that you guys only approved a ball diamond and some trails and then shelved the rest of that plan? Yes, the one that had had fulsome public input and planning……) Ms Baillargeon also pointed out that sometimes the public is not aware of all of the variables in a given situation and why certain recommendations are made. 

Councillor McArthur pointed out that 22,000 people live in Amherstburg. He also said that 24 people had voted for the Centennial Park location and 21 had voted for the Libro Centre location for the skate park. He pointed out that 4 votes matter as we know. (HAHAHAHA! That must’ve been a tongue in cheek reference to the 2018 deputy Mayor’s race…..and yes, 4 votes mattered!) He went on to say that he likes the plan at the Libro for the skate park and the possibilities for future expansion. 

There was a lot of discussion about this location. Councillor Courtney felt he had a gut feeling that the skatepark should be at Centennial Park and cited the 24 to 21 survey results. (Seriously…..anybody that cites a survey that’s basically equal…..and that was done by 45 people out of 22,000, well……this just defies logic! That means that 0.002% of our population participated in the survey……council is there to make the best decision for the entire community of Amherstburg!!!) Councillor Courtney then went on to say that he hopes it works out although he doesn’t think it will. He felt that there were few problems at Centennial Park and he hoped that the skatepark would get used at its new location. 

Councillor Prue felt that people had been promised a swimming pool and that it was supposed to be at the Libro. (Um, yup…..again…..it was in that Libro Master Plan that council set aside and put on a shelf…..maybe council should have adopted it last January in order to start planning and saving????) Councillor Prue felt that he would be pushing for money to be used towards a swimming pool. (Well, then, why did you not approve the Libro Master Plan? Then you could have planned and budgeted for a pool????) Ms Baillargeon then mentioned the Libro Secondary Plan and that it’s a balancing act of amenities for council. 

And finally, the motion carried. The skatepark will find it’s permanent home at the Libro Centre. (Now if only council could dust off that Libro Master Plan that they put in a box – oh wait – put on a shelf and get it approved so that they can start planning and budgeting for some amenities….)

Boblo Island Wastewater Pumping Station and Forcemain – Design and Construction Agreement

Here’s the recommendation : 

It is recommended that:

1. The Agreement to Design and Construct the Boblo Island Wastewater Pumping Station and Forcemain with Amico Infrastructures Inc. for an amount not to exceed $3,052,800 including net HST BE ACCEPTED and the Mayor and Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute the agreement. 

Of course, Councillor Prue opened with questions on this item. He took exception to these two sentences in the report : “The project is also critical to future development on Boblo Island. Without the project development would need to be reduced and the Town would be forgoing valuable tax base and water/wastewater rate contributions.”  He felt that future homes cost the town money in services. Mr Hewitt, from administration, felt that tax money spreads out the costs for the ratepayers and provides an economy of scale. Councillor Prue asked if it makes “us” money or not. 

CAO Haddad then spoke. He explained that the town is not here to make money, they are here to provide services. The town is not a private business. The CAO explained that growth helps offset the costs born and does attract commercial development. He pointed out that services and amenities are wanted but that there are ongoing legacy costs. He asked if the town would be in a positive cash flow position and that the answer is no, we would not. However, the money contributes to the quality of life in services. He explained that council has to decide what amenities that they want to include and that looking at items in isolation will perhaps appeal to some groups but there are competing demands for services and amenities. (Sing it! Sing it loud and clear! The town is not a business! The town is here to provide services to its residents…..that means that council has to make decisions and priorities based on planning and budgeting…..hmmm…..maybe the Libro Master Plan could help? Oh wait…..they didn’t approve it…..they set it aside….)

And finally, after a bit more discussion, the recommendation carried. 

Declaration of Surplus Properties for Disposition

Administration is recommending the disposal of a surplus piece of property. It seems that it is the property where the former Scout Hall is situated. It seems that the building is in need of extensive repairs and it is recommended to declare the property as surplus and sell it. From the report : “By declaring the Subject Property surplus to the needs of the Town, Council will allow for Administration to divest the Town of real property with little or no value to the operations of the Town while at the same time reducing risk and liability and maximizing property tax revenue. By appropriately using the Disposal of Real Property Policy, disposal of the Subject Property will be done in a fair and transparent manner and will utilize a competitive process.”

Councillor Prue wondered what the designation of the property was. The CAO said it is zoned institutional. Councillor Courtney then declared a conflict of pecuniary interest if council was going to be discussing rezoning. He said he owns a rental property two lots over at 292 Victoria Street.

Council went round and round a few times. I guess trying to sell property and get the highest amount of money possible wasn’t plain and simple for them. Finally, the motion was made and it carried. The property will be declared surplus and put up for sale. (Any investors or developers reading this right now? Hint hint)

2022 Municipal Election – Voting Method

It looks like the 2022 voting method will be the same as the 2018 voting method. Here are the recommendations : 

It is recommended that:

1. The traditional voting method with the use of electronic tabulators only BE APPROVED for advanced polls;

2. The traditional voting method with the use of electronic tabulators only BE APPROVED as the method of voting on Election Day;

3. By-law 2021-078 being a by-law to authorize the use of optical scanning vote tabulators in the 2022 Municipal Election be taken as having been read three times and finally passed and the Mayor and Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to sign same; and,

4. The Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to secure a vendor(s) for the 2022 Municipal Election. 

Councillor Courtney felt that he would support this voting method since in 2018 there was a recount and it was accurate. He wondered if the machine would recognize the referendum question about wards (Don’t even get me started on that! UGH!) The Clerk said that yes, the machine can recognize the yes/no votes about wards. Councillor Prue felt that there was no option but to do this. He felt that ini 2026 there should be a commitment for electronic voting. The Clerk pointed out that the report was complete and fulsome. (LOL! Good for her! I think I’m going to try to integrate the word ‘fulsome” into conversation somehow tomorrow…..just for fun….)

Deputy Mayor Meloche spoke (he is the product of 4 votes LOL) and felt that electronic voting would increase participation. 

And finally, the motion carried. 

Consent Correspondence

These are the items that council receives that they can either support or simply receive. 

Councillor Courtney wanted to support this : Opposition to WECHU Letter of Instruction – Town of Essex

He felt that there have been inconsistencies during the pandemic. He felt that this is a hot topic and that he doesn’t want to promote the spread of COVID but he then made a motion for council to support the Town of Essex’s letter of Opposition to the WECHU. Nobody seconded his motion. 

New Business

Some members of council pulled out their grocery lists. 

I’ll only talk about one, since well, the motion couldn’t get a seconder LOL. I always think it speaks loudly when nobody will second a motion. And by loudly I mean in a good way. 

Councillor Prue asked about the environmentally protected area on the north end of Boblo Island. He wondered when it would be actioned. He felt that we all have an interest…..A motion was made to get a report regarding development of an environmentally protected zone on the north end of Boblo Island. And crickets. No second. No go. 

It was now very close to 10:00. A motion was made to continue the meeting past 10PM. 

NOTICE OF MOTION

Notice of Motion by Councillor Courtney

Councillor Courtney read his motion to council. 

1. That Council AUTHORIZE the Town’s audit services provider, KPMG, to UNDERTAKE an audit review of the following items:

a) Internal Controls in place at the Town;

b) Operating Budget Variances that have occurred for the fiscal years 2018-2021; and

c) Capital Projects completed and/or underway for fiscal years 2018-2021 with a project value greater than $300,000, including the development of the 320 Richmond Street Hub Project;

2. That Council AUTHORIZE the CAO to sign all the necessary documents required to undertake the noted work;

3. That KPMG’s findings resulting from this engagement BE REPORTED to Council in accordance with the Municipal Act;

4. That, should the work done by KPMG as authorized by this resolution result in the need for further investigation, that KPMG report on the same to Council for its consideration; and

5. That the cost of this engagement be charged to CAO’s Office – Professional Services.

Councillor Prue seconded it. 

Deputy Mayor Meloche asked about the reasoning behind the motion. He pointed out that in 2014 there was a big review done by Deloitte. They had looked at everything and had provided 42 recommendations. Policies were written and amended based on the recommendations. Deputy Mayor Meloche also pointed out that KPMG already does reviews on the towns accounts and he asked what was the purpose of this review. (I know! I know! Pick me! I think it’s all just a big political game and ploy…..it will waste time and money…..but nobody will admit that right?)

Councillor Courtney felt that he did not know where the Deputy Mayor had been. He felt that there were concerns, things were presented to council that raised eyebrows. Councillor Courtney felt he wasn’t sure that they’ll find anything, but that if not, at least the people will know. He felt that members of the previous council felt that policies were rushed. He referenced a report being found in a box and went on about transparency. He felt that the new council and the next CAO would be able to start with the results of this audit. 

Deputy Mayor Meloche did not feel that policies were rushed. He felt that they came to council over the course of their 4 year term. He was concerned that KPMG had already been brought in to consult and discuss this issue. He felt he could support a review only if it was a very narrow scope of what would be examined. 

CAO Haddad spoke and said that he had wanted to be sure what Councillor Courtney was seeking and had convened a call with KPMG. He said that the time frame would depend on the scope and the expected outcomes. He estimated the cost anywhere from $20,000 to hundreds of thousands of dollars. 

Councillor McArthur felt that in general, a lot had transpired. He wasn’t sure an audit will provide any answers but that it will allow us to move forward. He felt that the HUB should be looked at as well as Duffy’s since the change orders had exceeded the threshold and council was not notified. He felt that these two projects should be looked at but then we need to move on. 

Councillor Simone agreed. She felt it was important moving forward, with a new CAO to have a clean slate. She felt that the audit would dispel the rumours. She had no doubt and was hopeful that KPMG would find all as it should be. 

Councillor Prue felt that the amount of money was not a big issue. He felt that $250,000 is 1% of the tax rate. He felt that it is worth 1% to let the public know and that it would be good for the people of this town. He felt that he wanted answers about things found in a box as well as the Hub. (This kind of made me chuckle…..suddenly 1% of the tax rate is A-OK. Until budget time when it’s slash and burn time…..Can’t have it both ways……no problem spending $250,000 for an audit that everyone on council seems to agree won’t show anything…..)

(And here’s my personal take…….IF, big IF…..the reasons for the three employees being let go in August were financial…..this motion would have been hot off the press by September 1st at the latest…..it wouldn’t have taken 4 months to get to it…..which leads me to believe that this is just for “optics” sake…..we’re going to spend all kinds of money to do an audit, that members of council were all saying likely won’t find anything amiss…..which means that they know that the August fiasco wasn’t financial…..they’re privy to the in-camera info…..if it were financial, they would know…..but I guess we will all sit back and wait and see…..and if the audit is clean? Will the public accept that? Or will the rumours simply continue on in true Amherstburg form for the next decade or two?)

Anyway, blah blah blah, yada yada yada, the motion carried. An audit there will be! 

It was heading onto 10:30…..Mayor DiCarlo spoke and thanked the front line workers, the mass vaccination workers, administration and council, the residents etc and wished everyone happy holidays. 

And then council went back in-camera…..I’m guessing they hadn’t finished their 4:30 meeting. 

And that’s a wrap folks! The last meeting of 2021 lasted darn near 4 and a half hours. Oh my! I barely made it through! If you made it here to the end, congratulations!!! You’re a real trooper!

As for me, 2021 isn’t quite over yet. I’ll be back with my year-end review before the New Year! It will be the last one for this council. Next year is an election year and I am anticipating a full complement of amusement park rides, with twists, turns, ups and downs. 

In preparation for Monday December 13th Regular town council meeting

Sooooooo Monday night’s meeting consists of a 631 page agenda AND a 21 page supplementary agenda. There are also a TON of hot button issues to be addressed. I guess that’s the result when council has wavered and been indecisive all year long…..if they want to have a productive (and dare I say efficient) meeting, they’re going to need to arrive prepared and leave the grandstanding for the actors in the theaters. Otherwise, this meeting could seriously last until 4:00 AM, no joke! It also looks like the meeting is virtual again and that the public can’t attend in person like last time. I’m guessing that’s due to the new public health measures put in place by the Health Unit. So, maybe I’ll just get into my pajamas before the meeting starts Monday night! LOL

Council is scheduled to meet in-camera at 4:30 to discuss : 

SPECIAL IN-CAMERA MEETING

That Council move into an In-Camera Meeting of Council pursuant to Section 239 of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended for the following reasons:

Item A – Section 239(2)(c) – A proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the municipality. 

Item B – Section 239(2)(k) – A position plan, procedure, criteria or instruction to be applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the municipality or local board.

Item C – Section 239(2)(c) – A proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the municipality. Section 239(2)(k) – A position plan, procedure, criteria or instruction to be applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the municipality or local board. 

First time in a long time that council is meeting in-camera without having personnel matters on the agenda. 

The regular meeting is supposed to start at 6:00. Here are the highlights and a brief, very brief preview. 

DELEGATIONS

Italian Heritage Monument Fundraising Committee – Remo DiPaolo and Domenic Cristofaro

It looks like Mr DiPaolo and Mr Cristofaro will be delegating to council on behalf of a committee in regards to erecting an Italian Heritage Monument in the Kings Navy Yard Park. It seems they’ll be giving a brief overview of the project as well as asking for help from town administration regarding the installation and issuing tax receipts for major donors. I recall that this idea was presented to council some months ago, it looks like now a committee of residents has been formed and are looking to get this project underway. 

Health and Safety Concerns at 320 Richmond Community Hub – Robert Moroz

There is a report later in the agenda in regards to Health and Safety Concerns at the Community Hub. It looks like Mr Moroz will be delegating to council and presenting some very serious safety concerns in regards to staff that work in the Community Hub building. It seems that there have been issues with staff being harassed and some very serious acts of vandalism. Mr Moroz’s presentation acknowledges staff’s support in engaging the Police Service, meeting with the stakeholders, removing the skate park and offers full support of staff recommendations that are found in the report. (More on that later in the blog)

247 Brock Street, St. Anthony’s School, Heritage Designation and Proposed Alterations – Rosati Group

It looks like Ms Lassaline will be presenting the proposal for the development of the former House of Shalom building. The presentation includes design and pictures to keep the heritage elements of the property, while also modernizing it and including some safety elements (an elevator etc). The new design is absolutely gorgeous! It appears the building is going to be developed into condominiums. 

PRESENTATIONS

CWATS Overview Presentation – Diana Radulescu, Jerry Behl and Todd Hewitt

It looks like CWATS (County-wide Active Transportation System) will be presenting to council. It looks like they have some proposed changes and updates to current routes as well as some new routes to be developed. It looks like the town is being asked to provide feedback to the county about the CWATS plan. Then, in the new year, CWATS will return to present their Master Plan to town council for their approval. 

Adoption of the 2021 Multi-Year Accessibility Plan – Amherstburg Accessibility Advisory Committee Chair Shirley Curson-Prue 

Ms Curson-Prue will be addressing council. It looks like the Accessibility Advisory Committee is looking for more targeted data regarding residents of Amherstburg with disabilities. It seems they’re working on a targeted work plan to identify existing and available supports. 

2022 Interim Tax Levy By-law 2021-076

Since council will not be debating the 2022 budget until February, there is a report before council to address that tax bills are sent out in early February. From the report : 

“The interim tax levy by-law is required in order to provide funds for municipal operating obligations until the budget is approved, tax rates are set and the final tax notices are issued. To provide for the February 28, 2022 due date interim tax notices will be mailed before February 4, 2022, which allows for the required notice of 21 days. Consequently, the by-law is being presented for three readings. The due date for the first installment is February 28, 2022 and the due date for the second installment is April 29, 2022. This continues the previous practice of setting the interim tax levy installment due dates on the last business day of February and April.”

320 Richmond St. (HUB) – Health and Safety Issues

It seems that there has been a lot of vandalism and harassing behaviours at the community Hub. Reading the report broke my heart. From the report : “On November 17, 2021 a meeting was called by the tenants of the building with administration and Windsor Police to discuss current vandalism and health and safety issues. During the meeting, the tenants all expressed a high degree of concern for their safety and the safety of patrons visiting the facility. There have been documented accounts of youth demonstrating aggressive and bullying tendencies towards staff and patrons attending the HUB. Individuals were found hiding in the bathrooms, following staff around, making derogatory comments and exhibiting harassing behaviours. This has escalated to a point where the tenants and their clients no longer feel safe attending work or the facility. Immediate action was necessary to try and help mitigate some of this activity and as a result administration removed the skate park.”

It looks like there is a need for improved lighting, security cameras, security personnel, a swipe card access system etc. There is a list of immediate, short-term and long-term needs in order to ensure people’s safety at the building. Here is the recommendation : 

That Council APPROVE a one-time emergency expenditure in the amount of $36,000 to cover the cost of cameras, automatic door swipe card access, improved lighting and a security guard for a 2 month period in order to improve safety and security at 320 Richmond in accordance with the report dated November 25, 2021.

Skate Park Update

Councillor McArthur has been asking about an update regarding the skate park location/relocation. The report is in and here is the recommendation : 

It is recommended that:

1. Council APPROVE the Skate Park be moved permanently to the Libro Complex in the northwest corner of the property located at 3295 Meloche Road.

2. Council DIRECT Administration to proceed with issuing an RFP to retain a specialized consulting design firm to prepare design drawings for a multi versatile Skate Park facility at the Libro Complex based on the most recent survey that closed December 6, 2021.

3. Council APPROVE funding from the Parks Capital Reserve Fund in the amount of $75,000 for retaining a specialized Skate Park design consultant to prepare design and construction drawings suitable for tender for the new multi versatile Skate Park.

4. Funding for the construction of the Skate Park be DEFFERED to the 2022 capital budget deliberations

I know some of my readers are very interested in the skate park issue. Here is the link to the full report with the reasons behind the recommendation : https://pub-amherstburg.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=5076

(It’s only 9 pages, not too bad of a read.)

The Italian Heritage Monument Project

There is a delegation earlier during the meeting that will be addressing council regarding this project. It seems that they have been meeting with town administration regularly and here are the recommendations for council: 

It is recommended that:

1. Council APPROVE IN PRINCIPLE the proposed Italian Heritage Monument Project on behalf of the Italian Heritage Monument Fundraising Committee provided the committee raise the funding for the project in its entirety as noted in the report of November 25, 2021. 

2. Council APPROVE IN PRINCIPLE the proposed location of the monument in Kings Navy Yard Park as per Appendix A.

3. Council APPROVE that Administration work with the Italian Heritage Monument Fundraising Committee on the following initiatives:

a. Develop an agreement between the Town of Amherstburg and the Italian Heritage Fundraising Committee for scope of work, creation of the sculpture, the roles and responsibilities of the committee and the Town including the ultimate transference of ownership of the sculpture and other rights to the Town of Amherstburg.

b. Develop a maintenance Trust Fund to be utilized for future maintenance and repairs.

c. The Financial Services Division set up an account for the Italian Heritage Monument to accept all fundraising and donations on behalf of the Italian Heritage Committee and issue tax receipts for donor contributions.

d. Ensure the monument meets or exceeds current construction and material standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Parks, Recreation, Facilities and Culture and that the project meet all obligations covered under the Town’s Memorial Policy (currently under review).

e. That the Heritage Committee be consulted on the location of the monument in the King’s Navy Yard Park in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act. 

4. Council DIRECT Administration to bring back a detailed report that outlines the full scope of the project, including all costs associated with the project and any long term financial commitments of the Town prior to commencement of work on site. 

Alma Street Watermain Improvement Detailed Design and Tendering Services – Memorandum of Understanding for Funding and Engineering Agreement

It looks like in September 2020, administration received a petition signed by property owners along Alma Street (4th concession area) for a watermain replacement to facilitate future industrial development. The proposed improvement project would extend and replace an existing portion of the watermain. It looks like administration needs council’s approval to enter into an agreement with the property owners for the engineering design costs and to enter into an agreement with Hrycay Consulting Engineers for detailed design and tendering services. 

Here are the recommendations : 

1. The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for funding contributions toward the detailed engineering design and tender services for the Alma Street Watermain BE APPROVED; 

2. The Mayor and Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to sign the MOU with 1710690 Ontario Ltd, Loricon Holdings Ltd, 1722817 Ontario Ltd, Joel Ferasol, and Matthew Chappus; 

3. The agreement with Hrycay Consulting Engineers Inc. to provide Detailed Design and Tender Services for the Alma Street Watermain BE APPROVED for an amount not to exceed $15,915 plus applicable taxes subject to being satisfactory in technical content to the Director of Infrastructure Services and in form and legal content to the Town’s legal counsel; and, 

4. The Mayor and Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to sign the agreement with Hrycay Consulting Engineers Inc. 

Boblo Island Wastewater Pumping Station and Forcemain – Design and Construction Agreement

I foresee a lengthy discussion on this one. Here’s the recommendation : 

It is recommended that:

1. The Agreement to Design and Construct the Boblo Island Wastewater Pumping Station and Forcemain with Amico Infrastructures Inc. for an amount not to exceed $3,052,800 including net HST BE ACCEPTED and the Mayor and Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute the agreement. 

Heritage Designation of 247 Brock Street and Proposed Alterations to the Heritage Attributes

As mentioned earlier, there is a delegation coming to council regarding the development of this property. Here are the recommendations for council  :

It is recommended that: 

1. Council DESIGNATE the “St. Anthony School” at 247 Brock Street by municipal bylaw under Part IV the Ontario Heritage Act. 

2. Council APPROVE the proposed alterations to the Heritage Attributes of the St. Anthony School as recommended in Attachment 4, and per the Proponent’s concept drawings (Attachments 2 and 3), except the proposed finishes to the rear addition and replacement of the three doorway fanlights

3. Council RECEIVE an alteration request for the finish of the new addition to the St. Anthony School building at a future date, and upon further collaboration between the Proponent, staff and the Heritage Committee. 

Declaration of Surplus Properties for Disposition

Administration is recommending the disposal of a surplus piece of property. It seems that it is the property where the former Scout Hall is situated. It seems that the building is need of extensive repairs and it is recommended to declare the property as surplus and sell it. From the report : “By declaring the Subject Property surplus to the needs of the Town, Council will allow for Administration to divest the Town of real property with little or no value to the operations of the Town while at the same time reducing risk and liability and maximizing property tax revenue. By appropriately using the Disposal of Real Property Policy, disposal of the Subject Property will be done in a fair and transparent manner and will utilize a competitive process.”

2022 Municipal Election – Voting Method

It looks like the 2022 voting method will be the same as the 2018 voting method. Here are the recommendations : 

It is recommended that:

1. The traditional voting method with the use of electronic tabulators only BE APPROVED for advanced polls;

2. The traditional voting method with the use of electronic tabulators only BE APPROVED as the method of voting on Election Day;

3. By-law 2021-078 being a by-law to authorize the use of optical scanning vote tabulators in the 2022 Municipal Election be taken as having been read three times and finally passed and the Mayor and Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to sign same; and,

4. The Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to secure a vendor(s) for the 2022 Municipal Election. 

2021 Multi-Year Accessibility Plan and Strategy

Again, there is a delegation from the Accessibility Advisory Committee earlier in the meeting. Here is the recommendation : 

It is recommended that:

1. The Town of Amherstburg ADOPT the 2021 Multi-Year Accessibility Plan in accordance with Ontario Regulation 191/11 section 4(1), as supported by the Amherstburg Accessibility Advisory Committee. 

Here is the link to the draft plan for those who are interested : https://pub-amherstburg.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=5066

Re-Opening Recreation Programming – Survey Results

There was a survey available recently for residents to provide input into programming that they would like to see in Amherstburg. The survey was available to all age-ranges. It’s a pretty interesting report that outlines the top 5 wants for each age-range. The report is before council simply to be received. Here’s a link to the report for those who are interested in the results of the survey : https://pub-amherstburg.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=5067

CONSENT CORRESPONDENCE

The following is a VERY lengthy list of consent correspondence for council. Council can receive the items and choose to act or make additional motions depending on each item. 

Bridge and Culvert Replacements – Township of Adelaide Metcalfe

Windsor Essex Regional Community Safety and Well-Being Plan, 2022- 2026 – County of Essex

Support for THRIVE Heritage White Paper – Amherstburg Freedom Museum

Pilot Program FoodCycler – Food Cycle Science Corporation

Canadian Agricultural Partnership (CAP) Targeted Cost-Share Initiative Aimed at Increasing Deadstock Management Capacity – Honourable Lisa Thompson, Minister of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs

Municipal Energy Symposium – Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO)

Navigating Conflict Relationships as an Elected Official – Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO)

Ontario Broadband Strategy, Excess Soil Regulations (Webinar), Planning Act Delegations – Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) Policy Update

Opposition to WECHU Letter of Instruction – Town of Essex

MADD Request for Advertising Endorsement – Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) 

NOTICE OF MOTION

Notice of Motion by Councillor Courtney

At the last meeting, Councillor Courtney had presented a notice of motion. Here is the motion that he will be presenting Monday night : 

1. That Council AUTHORIZE the Town’s audit services provider, KPMG, to UNDERTAKE an audit review of the following items:

a) Internal Controls in place at the Town;

b) Operating Budget Variances that have occurred for the fiscal years 2018-2021; and

c) Capital Projects completed and/or underway for fiscal years 2018-2021 with a project value greater than $300,000, including the development of the 320 Richmond Street Hub Project;

2. That Council AUTHORIZE the CAO to sign all the necessary documents required to undertake the noted work;

3. That KPMG’s findings resulting from this engagement BE REPORTED to Council in accordance with the Municipal Act;

4. That, should the work done by KPMG as authorized by this resolution result in the need for further investigation, that KPMG report on the same to Council for its consideration; and

5. That the cost of this engagement be charged to CAO’s Office – Professional Services.

Very interesting motion. I can just hear the grandstanding now…..

If you’ve managed to make it to the end of this pre-meeting blog, congratulations! Based on this agenda, I am guessing that I won’t be back with the post-meeting blog until Wednesday night! If the grandstanding and pontificating can be kept to a minimum (I know, that’s a big IF), maybe I’ll be back Tuesday night with the summary of how it all went down. I have a gut feeling that the last meeting of 2021 will be like a big dramatic episode of As Amherstburg Turns…..