Monday October 28th Regular town council meeting

Well, tonight was not too bad, not too bad at all. A lot less grandstanding and more on-point discussion, which was very nice to see. When I left the house, I thought my notebook may not make it through the meeting, so I brought along an extra, just in case. I said to my husband as I left :”I’ll bring an extra notebook, maybe it will be a good omen and the meeting won’t drag on.”. And, low and behold, didn’t need the new notebook, have about 7 pages to spare and the meeting wrapped up in about 2 and a half hours. So, I guess it was a good omen after all, to be prepared for potential grandstanding and then it did not happen…..well not too much anyway. 🙂

The gallery was jam packed full with spill over of people standing the gallery.

First, council met in-camera at 3:00 in-camera to discuss:

SPECIAL IN-CAMERA COUNCIL MEETING
That Council move into an In-Camera Meeting of Council at 3:00 pm pursuant
to Section 239 of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, for the following
reasons:
Item A – Section 239(2)(b) – Personal matters about an identifiable individual,
including municipal or local board employees; and, Section 239(2)(d) – Labour
relations or employee negotiations.

Then council had a 5:00 planning meeting.

The regular meeting started at 6:00. There were several delegations.

DELEGATIONS
Request to Allow Backyard Chickens for Therapeutic Purposes – Miranda Ronholm

It seems that Ms Ronholm moved to Amherstburg from Windsor in August of this year. She lives in the Monopoly subdivision now. There has been a complaint issued against her since she has 3 backyard “therapy chickens”.  Ms Ronholm said that she uses the chickens for her epilepsy and it has been greatly reduced since having the chickens. They also reduce her stress. She felt that the chickens are playful pets and they follow her around. They are protected in a coop that she cleans daily. She said she shares the eggs with the neighbours, well, the ones that she gets along with LOL. (I’m guessing not with the ones who made the complaint….?) Ms Ronholm said that she had a difficult pregnancy and the chickens have helped her to require less medication and they keep her calm and safe. She felt she would be sad and depressed if she had to get rid of her chickens and it would also cause her anxiety to have them removed. She said she is willing to obtain a licence or permit and to get inspections. She said that she keeps the coop clean. Ms Ronholm said that Windsor allowed her to keep the chickens when she provided a doctor’s note.

Councillor Prue asked Ms Rubli, the manager of Licensing when the bylaw would be coming forward regarding chickens and other animals. (Blog followers would remember there was public consultation about this issue some time ago.) Ms Rubli said that the town is waiting on provincial legislation regarding animal welfare and said they’re still waiting to see if the responsibility for enforcement will fall onto the municipality, the police or the humane society. Councillor Prue wondered if it would be possible to hold off on any enforcement action until the bylaw is finalized. And ultimately, that’s what happened. Ms Ronholm will keep her chickens, for the time being, until the bylaw comes back in front of council.

Request for Tiny House By-law – The Raybots Robotics Team, Stella Maris Catholic Elementary School

A group of students from Stella Maris were up next. Their group is called the Raybots Robotics Team. They were asking council to amend the bylaw regarding tiny houses. The students explained that tiny houses use less energy, increase trade, reduce the carbon footprint, require less maintenance, less materials, less energy, provide accessible living and neighbourhood revitalization.  They proposed a bylaw for a 28 square meter tiny house, there is currently no bylaw to allow a house this small. They expressed their willingness to work with the bylaw department.

The presentation was very well received by council and ultimately it was decided to write a letter of support of the idea to other municipalities and to send the presentation to the building department.

Request for the Town of Amherstburg to Take Part in ‘Green’ Initiatives – Paul Hertel

Mr Hertel spoke to council regarding green initiatives. He was asking council to prepare for changes that are looming on the horizon. He asked that environmental issues need attention especially in the upcoming official plan review. He wondered if the town’s fleet of cars cold be looked at, for example, converting to electric cars. He also suggested a new festival, called a Green Festival. (For those of you who know me, you know I really like festivals…..so count me in!)

There was some discussion about the ideas. Councillor Prue felt there were 4 things that should be done…..first, to forward the report to the November 29th Official Plan meeting, second to review the town’s fleet of vehicles to look at the possibility of electric cars, third for staff to look at green festivals, including the “Green man” and fourth to look at the possibility of green buildings. Councillor Simone added in to look for the possibility of bringing back an Advisory Committee. Councillor McArthur spoke about the Windsor/Essex Environmental Committee giving presentations to council and declaring a climate emergency, but that part was moved to new business.

Ultimately, council decided to receive the presentation and proceed with the ideas listed above.

Parking on Windermere Place – Mark & Heidi Olivito and Lisa Carnelos, Windermere Place Residents

Mr Olivito spoke first and said he was speaking for 5 residents out of 6 houses that exist on Windermere Place. It seems he has been there for 20 years and that all of the homes were built based on parking being available. However, recently a truck came and installed no parking signs. He was seeking a compromise of parking on one side of the street. Another neighbour spoke and said that she felt the there was ample room for emergency vehicles as she felt their street is as wide or wider than other streets. The neighbours showed some pictures of a big truck parked on the road and a car easily going around it.

Councillor Courtney then spoke and said he had seen their emails and he saw the answers from the other members of council, so he didn’t answer them. (Yes you read that right……) Anyway, Councillor Courtney then said he was driving home today so he took a drive by and felt the area had a nice amenity for 6 houses and other houses had just a driveway. Councillor Courtney pointed out that fire trucks clip cars all the time and that the residents would have to compromise and only look at parking on one side of the street. Again, the neighbour pointed out that they were only asking for parking on one side of the street not both.

Another neighbour joined the discussion however, he had a different opinion than the first set of neighbours. He said that he owns 2 properties on that street and has enjoyed it for 13 years, however, in the last 2 years it has become a party zone and they have had to call the police regarding the noise, parties and parking. This neighbour expressed that he was against allowing parking on the street and did not want the agreement changed. He said he felt that administration was in accordance with not changing the agreement. A picture was shown with cars parked on both sides of the street.

Ms Rublie, the Manager of Licensing and Bylaw said the pictures stem from a previously investigated complaint. She said that the 1991 agreement stipulated no parking on either side of the street because of the narrow width. She said that emergency vehicles do not have enough clearance (if cars are parked there) in accordance with the Ontario Building Code.

There was a lot of back and forth about the width of the road and the ability for a fire truck to be able to maneuver it. Councillor Courtney and Fire Chief Montone had quite a bit of back and forth about this. Basically, the Fire Chief said that part of the difficulty regarding the issue is not just for the fire truck to pass through but also the difficulty in operating the vehicle and the aerial apparatus.

The dispute raged on among the neighbours…..

Finally, Councillor Prue made a motion to send the issue back to the neighbourhood to see if it would be feasible to widen the roadway but the neighbours would pay for it. They will work with staff and get the costs and come back in the future with a resolve to make the road wider to provide parking.

As Deferred on Sept. 9, 2019 – Establishing a Lobbyist Registry and Appointing a Lobbyist Registrar

Last month, the establishment of a lobbyist registry was a hot topic in council chambers. So hot, in fact, that the issue seemed to bring out some fairly poor behaviour for the public meeting, even had an unruly member of the public escorted out by the police. Tonight the issue was back in front of council. However, council simply received the report and there was no discussion. So, that was that. Done. No lobby registry.

Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program (ICIP) – Amherstburg Great Spaces, Great Places Project

This was, to me, the highlight of the evening. The CAO presented the grant application for some major projects for our town. The town is asking for $50 Million from the Federal and Provincial governments to be used to improve and enhance the quality of life in Amherstburg. The Community Wish list was established through public consultation, talk the Burg, various communications and other initiatives.

Regarding waterfront amenities, the residents are looking for the Duffy’s property to be developed and with active programming. The residents want access to the water and more events. As well, year round pickle ball, trails and theme splash pads are on the list of residents wants. The CAO also explained that the residents want outdoor activities for the young and old, kayaking, trails, outdoor skating, enhanced skateboard parks among other amenities. (I can only write so fast people! I couldn’t catch it all, but I think I got most of it….)

The government has announced that they will be giving $727 Million over a 10 year period to municipalities for certain improvements that meet their criteria. The grant was announced on September 3rd and must be submitted by November 12th, so there are some tight time lines involved.

Here’s the breakdown of the projects :

The Big Connection ($2.87 million)

  • Simcoe Road Multi-Use Trail Improvements
  • Neighbourhood Linkage Development
  • Community Connectors (to existing hubs / areas of interest)

Waterfront Civic Plaza ($11.5 million)

  • Civic Square / Extension of Navy Yard park
  • Amphitheatre / performance area / comfort station
  • Accessible Multi-use pier / breakwater (fishing / tall ship events)
  • Marina
  • Accessible Walking path / bench / water and fire feature

Belle Vue Gardens and Conservatory ($10.34 million)

  • Botanical gardens / Carolinian Arboretum
  • Community venue / multi-use space
  • Greenhouses
  • Parking
  • Pavilion / washroom
  • The Historical Walking Mile

During the Belle Vue presentation, the CAO pointed out that the funds do not include improvements for the house as the town has partnered with the Conservancy to apply for another, different grant for $4.29 Million.

The Libro Centre of Excellence ($25.29 million)

  • The Big Creek trail and lookout loop
  • The 5,000-step trail loop
  • Ball diamonds / soccer pitches
  • Swimming pool
  • Pickle ball
  • Pavilion / change rooms
  • Event Plaza / Parking

**Side note……the indoor pool would be a 25 meter, fully accessible pool. **

If the town is successful getting these funds, it would address 48 of the 77 recommendations in the Parks Master Plan over a period of 7 years, which would put us 13 years ahead of schedule. Without senior government funding, realizing these projects would be very difficult.

It was pointed out that our state of the art Libro facility also came to fruition from senior level government grant money and we were able to get it for a fraction of the cost. The CAO also explained that this plan addressed venues that were lost at Centennial Park as well as other wish list items of the residents. CAO Miceli also thanked all of the town staff with their hard work getting this proposal together since the September 3rd announcement since the deadlines are tight.

Then it was opened up to council for questions or comments. Deputy Mayor Meloche felt it was quite exhilarating that we would only have to spend 27 cents on the dollar. He also pointed out that the residents would have to be ready to accept the costs involved, such as operating costs in the future. The CAO said that the town’s contribution would be factored into the 2020 budget and that the federal and provincial government would be looking to be sure that the town’s asset management plans are up to date. (For those who have only been following local politics for a short while, we did not have any of these documents prior to the arrival of CAO Miceli, just sayin’.)

Councillor Prue said he had quite a few questions. It was clarified that the $729 Million is only available for Ontario municipalities. It was also clarified that the federal government will decide which towns get the money and how much. It seems that $62,000 will be set aside in the 2020 budget and another $50,000 put into reserves. Councillor Prue figured that was approximately $60 per household. Councillor Prue felt that we could not afford not to do this. (I agree 100%).

Councillor McArthur felt that we can’t ignore 27 cents on the dollar. He referred to a quote of Mayor DiCarlo’s about many items being in the works and we have several pieces in the air at the moment. He felt that we need a pool but that an indoor pool is an $8 Million investment. He felt this was a fantastic plan and great for our community. (I agree 100%)

Councillor Renaud talked about when we got the Libro Centre and how we only had to pay a fraction of the cost. He felt that if we could get this money and get the Duffy’s project done, with winter time activities that it would be very unique for our community. (I agree 100%)

Councillor Courtney felt it was a great presentation and that we can’t go wrong going forward. However, he felt some of the costs would be extraordinary and used the example of the botanical gardens and how much staff would be required for the upkeep. He felt that we’ve lost assets and need ball diamonds and a pool.

Councillor Simone had some questions about another stream of the grant but also thought it was a great plan.

Someone from the audience wanted to speak. So Councillor Prue and Councillor Simone made a motion to waive the rules of order…..(this seems to have become the norm with this council rather than an exemption, but I’ll hold back my thoughts on this new norm…..for tonight anyway…)

The first person to speak thanked Ms Rota and her committee for the Uncommon Festival. He pointed out that it wasn’t that long ago that Amherstburg was under fire for spending too much money. He felt that this plan was great but also hoped that a boat ramp could be included…..

Another resident spoke and expressed concern that there are no accommodations for travelers. He felt this issue needed to be addressed.

Mayor DiCarlo pointed out that we have 2 commitments for hotels. One will be breaking ground in the spring, in the downtown area. He mentioned there have been a few delays. (again for those who follow a bit, you would know that the downtown hotel is in the planning stages and some members of council slowed down the process due to “parking issues”….) Mayor DiCarlo said that the other hotel is to be kitty corner to the Libro and that the plans are still moving forward.

New Business

Councillor McArthur made a motion about declaring a climate emergency.

Councillor Prue referred to 2 emails that he got today. The first was about a light on Boblo that is too bright.

The second email he said he received at 11:50 AM this morning. The resident was asking for accounts payable from December 2018 to June 2019 and wondered if it would be much work to get those for him. The Treasurer said it wouldn’t be a problem and could get them for Councillor Prue. Councillor Prue thanked him, said he wanted to see them and he’ll do his best to read through them but they make him fall asleep. Mayor DiCarlo asked if Councillor Prue wanted them included in the next agenda……Councillor Prue said yes, since it’s an awful lot of reading……then the CAO pointed out that council is provided with all the cheque statements in an email each month……(things that make you go hmmmmm……)

Anyway, overall, tonight’s meeting was much, much better than two weeks ago. Next week, the budget will be presented to council and to the public…..so I’ll see you in a week!

 

In preparation for Monday October 28th 2019 regular town council meeting

Monday looks to be a pretty busy meeting night for council. The regular agenda is only 126 pages (no excuses not to be prepared in advance here……just sayin’ ) and a 4 page supplementary agenda too. There is an in-camera meeting scheduled for 3:00, then a planning meeting at 5:00, then the regular meeting scheduled for 6:00. Here are the highlights as I see ’em:

The 3:00 in-camera meeting is up first.

SPECIAL IN-CAMERA COUNCIL MEETING
That Council move into an In-Camera Meeting of Council at 3:00 pm pursuant
to Section 239 of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, for the following
reasons:
Item A – Section 239(2)(b) – Personal matters about an identifiable individual,
including municipal or local board employees; and, Section 239(2)(d) – Labour
relations or employee negotiations.

After the planning meeting at 5:00, here are the highlights for the regular meeting.

DELEGATIONS
Request to Allow Backyard Chickens for Therapeutic Purposes – Miranda Ronholm

It seems that Ms Ronholm moved to Amherstburg from Windsor in August of this year. It appears that she has 3 backyard “therapy chickens”. It seems that the owner has a doctor’s note for the chickens. For those who have been following the blog for a while, you may recall a presentation to the past council a few years back regarding backyard chickens…..they weren’t allowed then and I don’t believe there is a bylaw allowing them now……this should be interesting. Good luck council.

Request for Tiny House By-law – The Raybots Robotics Team, Stella Maris Catholic Elementary School

This appears to be a group of students from Stella Maris School that will be requesting council to implement a tiny house bylaw.  The problem they have identified is “… a need for affordable, accessible, and ecologically responsible housing in our community. ” They are using several environmentally conscious points to make their case, such as lower expenses, lower energy use, easy maintenance, etc. We’ll have to wait and see what council has to say about this idea.

Request for the Town of Amherstburg to Take Part in ‘Green’ Initiatives – Paul Hertel

It seems Mr Hertel will be delegating to council regarding some green initiatives that he feels should be implemented in Amherstburg. To list a few, he’d like to see a review, an update, and have the town exceed the provincial “green” standards in all planning  and strategic policy documents,  restore an environmental and greenness citizen’s committee, as well as several other “green” initiatives . The environment seems to be a hot button issue at the moment, we’ll see what council thinks.

Parking on Windermere Place – Mark & Heidi Olivito and Lisa Carnelos, Windermere Place Residents

It seems that on Windermere Place, there is no parking allowed on either side of the street. The residents are asking council to allow for parking on one side of the street as there is no other available parking within a safe and reasonable walking distance to their home. They’ve included photos in their delegation showing that there is ample space if vehicles are only parked on one side of the street. We’ll see what council thinks of the situation.

By-law 2019-086 Capital Works Borrowing – OILC Debenture Application

This looks to be about moving some money from reserves to pay for a wastewater project. Looks pretty dry to me. (haha, pun intended).

Kingsbridge Subdivision Phase 8A – Acceptance of Infrastructure

This looks to be regarding some underground infrastructure for the Kingsbridge Subdivision. I’m guessing this will go through without much discussion, if any, but who knows?

As Deferred on Sept. 9, 2019 – Establishing a Lobbyist Registry and Appointing a Lobbyist Registrar

Last month, the establishment of a lobbyist registry was a hot topic in council chambers. So hot, in fact, that the issue seemed to bring out some fairly poor behaviour for the public meeting, even had an unruly member of the public escorted out by the police…..well, the issue is back after the one month deferral and I can only hope that people’s behaviour can remain respectful for this discussion.

“Further to the deferral above, the Mayor suggested that any amendments Council would
like considered at the October meeting be forwarded to administration for consideration.
As the matter was deferred, the September 9th report has been resubmitted in its original state, as an attachment to this report. The addition of Council’s suggested amendments for consideration have been added below for discussion and deliberation on October 28, 2019.

It is important to note that while Council has provided suggestions for amendment,
Administration still recommends the by-law as originally proposed on September 9, 2019.”

Within the report, the proposed changes to the bylaw by council are noted in red. There’s an entire new section, in red, that pretty much exempts anybody and everybody from being a registered lobbyist, so, in my opinion, makes the bylaw useless.

This is the new section that council wants to have added :

“A new subsection 5.1.3
All the following persons or classes of persons are excluded from inclusion in any
such registry:

  • all ratepayers, homeowners and condominium owner’s groups
  • all religious organizations and church sponsored groups
  • all community groups including, but not limited to, sports associations,
    registered charities, civic clubs and not for profit organizations
  • all civic unions doing business with the town, agencies of the town including
    fire and police services and school boards.”

It also seems that council wants the Clerk’s office to be responsible to administer the lobbyist registry to reduce the expenses. It’s noted in the report that to do so, would require hiring an additional staff member…….

It seems with these amendments that only developers would fall into the category of lobbyists…..it seems like those who scream the loudest have influenced council with their recommended changes to this bylaw, just my observation. We’ll see what happens Monday night, but I’m pretty sure I know what will happen.

Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program (ICIP) – Amherstburg Great Spaces, Great Places Project

WOW! This one is a DOOZIE!! It looks like administration wants to apply for a $50 Million grant and use the funds towards Belle Vue, the Duffy’s property development and the expansion of the Libro Centre.

“The Governments of Canada and Ontario have set aside $727 million dollars over a 10-
year period starting in 2019-20 in the Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program (ICIP)
to be disbursed starting in 2020. Municipalities have been encouraged to submit grant
funding applications for projects which are to be solely based on improving the community’s experience and social well being. There are two category funding streams that are presently open for intake. There are the Multi-Purpose Category (MPC) and the
Rehabilitation and Renovation Category (RRC). The maximum individual project cap in
the MPC is $50 million in total project cost, with the Federal Government contributing
40%, Provincial Government contributing 33.33% and the applicant Municipality
contributing 26.67%. The maximum individual cap for the RRC is $5 million per application.

Projects must be completed by March 31, 2027 and priority will be given to projects that
meet community and user needs, promote good Asset Management, represent good
value for money and foster greater accessibility. The deadline for applications to be submitted is November 12, 2019.”

“This project will connect and develop Amherstburg’s three newly acquired public spaces to provide the community with a unique opportunity to experience and access multipurpose recreation, historical and cultural centers and regionally significant ecological systems through trails, themes and route systems. The intent of this project is also to provide seamless accessible connection to existing recreational (Libro Centre / KNYP), historical (Fort Malden NHP, Freedom Museum), and community hub (Amherstburg Community Health and Wellness Hub – former St. Bernard School) assets.”

Here’s the breakdown of the projects 🙂

Key components to the AGS-GP project would include the following:

The Big Connection ($2.87 million)

  • Simcoe Road Multi-Use Trail Improvements
  • Neighbourhood Linkage Development
  • Community Connectors (to existing hubs / areas of interest)

Waterfront Civic Plaza ($11.5 million)

  • Civic Square / Extension of KNYP
  • Amphitheatre / performance area / comfort station
  • Accessible Multi-use pier / breakwater (fishing / tall ship events)
  • Marina
  • Accessible Walking path / bench / water and fire feature

Belle Vue Gardens and Conservatory ($10.34 million)

  • Botanical gardens / Carolinian Arboretum
  • Community venue / multi-use space
  • Greenhouses
  • Parking
  • Pavilion / washroom
  • The Historical Walking Mile

The Libro Centre of Excellence ($25.29 million)

  • The Big Creek trail and lookout loop
  • The 5,000-step trail loop
  • Ball diamonds / soccer pitches
  • Swimming pool
  • Pickle ball
  • Pavilion / change rooms
  • Event Plaza / Parking

Well, to sum it up, this sounds PHENOMENAL!!!! I can only hope that council approves the grant application and from there can only really hope that we get the grant funding! I would love to see these developments come to fruition! (Personally, the Duffy’s property is my personal preference……would love to see that property developed into something spectacular for Amerstburg!)

Contributor Percent of Total Funding Total Funds
Government of Canada 40.00% $20,000,000
Province of Ontario 33.33% $16,665,000
Town of Amherstburg 26.67% $13,335,000
Total Project Funding 100% $50,000,000

Dangerous Dog Appeal Committee Appointments (supplementary agenda)

Back in February, council decided to establish a dangerous dog appeal committee. It seems they had a hard time finding applications, but finally, there are 3 applicants for this committee. From the report :

It is recommended that:
1. Section 3.4 of the Town’s Boards and Committees Appointment Policy BE
WAIVED to allow Chris Drew to be appointed to more than two (2) Boards or
Committees in a Term of Council; and,
2. Chris Drew, David Fox and Cassandra Malcolm BE APPOINTED to the
Dangerous Dog Appeal Committee.

And that about sums it up……only 126 pages in the regular agenda and 4 pages in the supplementary agenda. The agenda was posted for the public yesterday (Thursday). I believe that council receives the agenda one day prior to the public on Wednesday. Which means, council has 5 full days to do their reading and get their questions answered BEFORE Monday night…..lately that does not seem to be the trend and it’s made me question some council members preparedness for the meetings…..will ALL members of council be prepared Monday night? Will they have had their questions asked and answered in advance? Or will the public be subject to more grandstanding? I’ll let you know Monday night I guess……only time will tell.

 

 

Tuesday October 15th regular town council meeting

Well tonight’s meeting wrapped up in just under two hours, which was nice and refreshing, however it had a heavy sprinkling of grandstanding and showboating, which was less nice and absolutely not refreshing.

First, council met in-camera starting at 3:30 to discuss :

SPECIAL IN-CAMERA COUNCIL MEETING
That Council move into an In-Camera Meeting of Council at 3:30 pm pursuant to Section 239
of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, for the following reasons:
Item A – Section 239(2)(d) – Labour relations or employee negotiations.
Item B – Section 239(2)(e) – Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before
administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board; and, Section 239(2)(f) – Advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose.
Item C – Section 239(2)(e) – Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before
administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board; and, Section 239(2)(f) – Advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose.
Item D – Section 239(2)(i) – A trade secret or scientific, technical, commercial, financial or labour relations information, supplied in confidence to the municipality or local board, which, if disclosed, could reasonably be expected to prejudice significantly the competitive position, or interfere significantly with the contractual or other negotiations of a person, group of persons, or organization; and, Section 239(2)(k) – A position, plan, procedure, criteria or instruction to be applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the municipality or local board.
Item E – Section 239(2)(f) – Advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose.

The doors opened to the public around 5:40 or so.

The meeting started shortly after 6:00. All members of council were present tonight.

DELEGATIONS
Request for Exemption to Open Air Fire By-law – Peter Thyrring, Headmaster, St. Peter’s ACHS College School

Mr Thyrring addressed council regarding the open air fire by-law. It seems that the school applied for a permit in July, however, they were denied the permit due to being within 100 meters of a sensitive receptor (the school).  Mr Thyrring said that the school operates as both a camp and a school, as well as a residence, since he lives there. He felt that he understands the concerns about open air fires but he would like to have a few fires per year for the camp. The school is located out in the county and he noted that exemptions are allowed for religious reasons and a few other reasons. Mr Thyrring asked for an exemption to the bylaw and requested leniency. He feels that the exemption could also apply to his neighbours as well. He also requested that should his organization not be given the exemption, that he would like his application fee refunded.

Councillor Courtney asked about the time of day that Mr Thyrring would be looking to have a fire. It seems it would be at night time, outside of school hours. Councillor Courtney also wondered how many nearby properties could apply for permits if the school weren’t a sensitive receptor. It seems there are 30 properties within the 100 meters of the school that could get a permit as well if the bylaw were waived. There was a lot of back and forth about school operating hours and the Fire Chief pointed out that the operating hours of a school can’t be controlled since there can be after hours and/or weekend activities.

Councillor McArthur seemed to feel that people near schools should be able to have fires at night and during the summer time. Councillor Prue asked several questions about the bylaw and how areas were identified and singled out as sensitive receptors. He asked the questions since he wasn’t on council at the time and was not involved with the creation of the bylaw. (For any of my readers that even marginally follow our local politics and read the newspaper or listen to the news…….well, this was reported on ad infinitum in the news…..so I won’t force you to relive it in the blog, although Councillor Prue forced us to sit through it all again tonight.)

After the Fire Chief finished explaining how the bylaw came to be three years ago or so, Councillor Courtney wondered if rather than providing a blanket exemption, perhaps a special occasion clause could be given for fires on the school property. The Fire Chief explained that this is all in council’s purview, however, it would allow other residents within 100 meters of the school (or any other sensitive receptor) to come forward asking for the same exemption. Ultimately, a motion was made for a report to be prepared by administration of how this exemption could be done and how it would impact all sensitive receptors. This carried.

Then Councillor Simone said that she had a question regarding delegations. She said that all of council were aware that someone was denied a delegation for tonight and wondered if council could hear them. The rules of order were waived and Bob Rozankovic went to the microphone.

Mr Rozankovic said that he was there representing the Amherstburg Taxpayer’s Association. (A.T.A. or ATA). He said that he wanted to address council regarding Centennial Park. He felt that the issue has been limited since it has supposedly been discussed in-camera. He went on to explain that the park is named in tribute to a great Mayor…. (Back story, real quick, the school board purchased the southern end of Centennial Park to build a new high school, which will leave part of the track, the gravel area where the arena used to be and the hill as empty park land)…. Mr Rozankovic felt that the “vast majority” of people want the land to remain park land. He said that it’s the third busiest park in Amherstburg. He cited many organizations and clubs that donated money towards the park. Mr Rozankovic also cited a motion from 2018 regarding St. Bernard and discussed that council decisions should be made public. He claimed that Deputy Mayor Meloche said that the property would become geared to income property.

Mr Rozankovic also said that each person that ran for council stated during the election, their preference to keep the property as parkland……(note to self, go back and check the blog questions, do some fact checking…..I’m 99.9% sure that Donald McArthur had all kinds of ideas and possibilities for that property that did not include keeping it park land…….) Aha! Here’s the link, save yourselves some time. Always better to go check facts first I guess. 

https://amherstburg2.wordpress.com/2018/09/21/candidates-responses-regarding-centennial-park-and-replacing-the-lions-pool/

So, quite clearly, at least one statement made during the delegation seems to be inaccurate.

Mr Rozankovic then asked who among council will make a motion to discuss Centennial Park in public and who among council will make a motion to stop any negotiations about the property?

Well, the answer to that was no one. No one at all. There was a motion made very quickly by Deputy Mayor Meloche and seconded by Councillor Simone to receive the delegation and that was that.

Zoning By-Amendment –ES Howard Ave 12R27356 Parts 2 to 4 (470- 02400)

This is a pretty lengthy report about a property on Howard Avenue that seems to be going through some zoning changes. Councillor Prue had several questions regarding a storm water pond on the site. He wondered if it would attract wildlife or mosquitoes. The CAO explained that the drawing for the proposed site plan had the perimeter capped and access to the water would be very difficult for wildlife, unless they wanted to develop a habitat in a gravel lot. He also told Councillor Prue that administration could have been better prepared for his questions had he asked them in advance of the meeting. Councillor Prue said he had only read the report today. (Blogger side note…..but why in the world does Councillor Prue – and some others – continue to do this? The agenda was available to the public on Friday for a Tuesday night meeting. Council gets the agenda at least a day before the public, so on Thursday in this case right? Why are they only reading the agenda the day of the meeting on a regular basis? This seems to be the excuse of the day of not getting questions for administration ready ahead of time……starting to look like some game playing is going on and the optics are getting more and more grim as this term goes on…...) There were many more back and forth questions and Mr Galvin assured Councillor Prue that all would be confirmed  and spelled out.

Committee Vacancies

It seems that there have been some more resignations from a few of the town’s committees. It seems that the vacancy for the Co-An Park Committee needs to be filled. However, the other 2 committees can continue to operate “as is” without replacing the vacancies, since council had appointed extra lay members to those committees. Here are the recommendations:

It is recommended that:
1. The vacant position on the Co-An Park Committee BE ADVERTISED;
2. The Accessibility Advisory Committee composition BE REDUCED to seven
(7) lay members; and,
3. The Seniors Advisory Committee composition BE REDUCED to six (6) lay
members and one (1) stakeholder member.

It seems that a lay person can’t sit on more than two committees during one council term, to avoid undue influence in too many committees. Diversity of thought is a goal for having a variety of people sit on the various committees.

This carried with very little discussion.

INFORMATION REPORTS

Council receives many reports that are for information only.  That means that no action is necessary, however council can still ask questions or make motions if they chose to.

Accounts Receivable – Amherstburg Festival Corporation

Back in February, council had asked for a report regarding an outstanding debt from the Amherstburg Festival Corporation. It seems the bill has gone to collections and the collection agency is recommending that the debt be written off.

Councillor Courtney said that this item had been on the back burner for a while and it was finally here. He asked administration if the bill had gone to collections and yes, it had. Councillor Courtney then asked for how long it had been in collections. The CAO said for over a year. Then Councillor Courtney asked when the town became aware of the bill and that he had a bunch of questions. (Here we go again…….can’t get the questions asked ahead of time, like a well prepared member of council would do, let’s wait and put it all on the spot, but why? So we can all sit there while administration digs back through files trying to find the date for a question that Councillor Courtney could have asked days ago…..but there we sat in silence, watching town staff reading computer screens and scrolling looking for answers to last minute questions…..) Councillor McArthur said he thought it was June 2017, but administration continued to search to get the exact date for Councillor Courtney. Councillor Courtney then wondered if once the bill was found if all conditions were met. The Treasurer said it was recommended to write off the debt since it wouldn’t be prudent to keep it on the books since it’s uncollectable. Councillor Courtney then wondered if there was a statute of limitations for small claims court since he had heard that there was a 2 year window.

Mr Galvin then tried to explain the way the law works to Councillor Courtney. Mr Galvin felt that the reality behind these types of claims was that if a collection agency can’t get the money, nobody can. He felt that unless Councillor Courtney wanted to pierce the corporate veil, that it would be extremely difficult to collect on such items. He also said that in the future, contracts should be issued and deposits requested.

Councillor Courtney then expressed that he felt that the town didn’t follow the policy since back in December the bill was still in collections. He felt that you can’t get blood from a stone and that litigation would be a waste of money. (Then, please tell me why, Councillor Courtney, you continued to ask all of these questions????) The Treasurer, Mr Rousseau, expressed that the policy was implemented and followed and that council could go the litigation route if they chose to. Councillor Courtney then went on and on and on about options and taxpayers and litigation expenses and said he’d have a motion later in new business.

Deputy Mayor Meloche said that he felt that at the end of the day the Amherstburg Police Service Board had a responsibility about this bill and they dumped it on administration’s lap. He did not feel it was right that all of the blame was being put on administration. Deputy Mayor Meloche pointed out that the APSB operated as it’s own entity.

This caused some hands to go up in the gallery……so Councillor Prue made a motion to waive the rules of order to allow Bob Rozankovic and Diane Pouget to speak.

Mr Rozankovic spoke first. He said he was the chair of the APSB in 2018 and was a member of the APSB for 3 years prior to that. He felt that it was false that the Deputy Mayor said this bill was dumped on administration. He said that the CAO and the Treasurer came to an APSB meeting and that the APSB was ready to take legal action against the Amherstburg Chamber of Commerce. He claims that the CAO said he’d take the debt and get it paid.

The CAO asked Mr Rozankovic if the APSB was aware that there were unrecorded invoices on the town’s books. Mr Rozankovic claimed that the APSB chased the debt with the Amherstburg Chamber of Commerce and that the debt was around $17,000. He said that the Chief reduced the bill to around $15,000 and that the Chamber asked to pay the bill in installments. One payment of $1,000 was made according to Mr Rozankovic.

The CAO then said that the reason the town stepped into the situation was because the APSB kept two sets of books. He also asked to confirm that Mr Rozankovic was a member of the Board of Directors of the Chamber of Commerce at that time as well.

Then Councillor Courtney got involved and tried to get the yelling and arguing to stop. (Funny, because his 37 “questions” that he didn’t ask ahead of time is what started this whole entire fiasco in the first place……How convenient, ask the “questions”, stir the pot, then try to stop the pot from exploding……it didn’t work…..)

Then the former Councillor Pouget spoke. She said that council did not give permission for the CAO to take the bill. She claimed she became aware of the bill in October 2018 when someone asked her about it. She said that before it’s written off, that they should ask for documentation. Mayor DiCarlo said that it exists but that he can’t show it and that she knows why. She claimed not to know anything about it and cited only missing two meetings during her term. (Spoiler alert…..at the end of the meeting, Mayor DiCarlo said he confirmed that the documentation was made available to council on 9/11/17 and that Councillor Pouget was in attendance at that meeting……)

New Business

There were a bunch of small items discussed during new business, I won’t bore you with all of them, but this was kind of interesting.

Councillor Prue made a motion asking for a report regarding the North end of the Boblo Island development. He said that the law states that the developer is responsible for roads, lighting, curbs etc and wanted to know when will town staff enforce the bylaw so that the people on Boblo have the same things as other new subdivisions. (I think Boblo Island has become the new Texas Road for this new council’s term……just sayin’.)

Councillor Prue also asked about ticket money generated from traffic violations. It seems a resident had asked him if the town gets the money or if Windsor gets the money, since we have a contract with Windsor Police for our policing services. The short answer : the town gets the money. (Maybe this person can find a new conspiracy theory for the next meeting to ask questions about…...)

Then a resident came to the microphone and said that he felt that Councillor Prue had a conflict since he is a resident on Boblo Island. He felt that Councillor Prue shouldn’t be voting on something that affects him directly.

Councillor Prue replied that he is not in conflict since he has a position in common with the other residents and that he had checked with the Integrity Commissioner. There was some back and forth and I guess at this point, it really doesn’t matter or I really just don’t care……I’m getting very tired of the grandstanding by a certain two councillors.

As I was typing this blog, I just saw a tweet that council came out of their in-camera meeting and are going to waste $9,375 to engage a consultant for a CAO performance appraisal. (Council got into a screaming match over writing off an uncollectable debt of $16,950, then throws $9,375 out the window……ridiculous.) I wonder if the CAO will ask for a raise if he gets a good review?

At the beginning of this new council’s terms, I had such high hopes. Tonight, they’re gone. This “new” council may be worst than the last…..words I thought I’d never say.

See you in two weeks.

 

In preparation for Tuesday October 15th regular town council meeting

Well, we’re heading into a long weekend, so council will have their regular meeting on Tuesday night, since Monday is a holiday. The agenda is a light 247 pages, so I think I should be able to skim through it and find some highlights for Tuesday, then I’m going to enjoy my long weekend with the people that I love.

Here are the highlights as I see ’em:

Council is scheduled to go in-camera at 3:30 to discuss :

SPECIAL IN-CAMERA COUNCIL MEETING
That Council move into an In-Camera Meeting of Council at 3:30 pm pursuant to Section 239
of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, for the following reasons:
Item A – Section 239(2)(d) – Labour relations or employee negotiations.
Item B – Section 239(2)(e) – Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before
administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board; and, Section 239(2)(f) – Advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose.
Item C – Section 239(2)(e) – Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before
administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board; and, Section 239(2)(f) – Advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose.
Item D – Section 239(2)(i) – A trade secret or scientific, technical, commercial, financial or labour relations information, supplied in confidence to the municipality or local board, which, if disclosed, could reasonably be expected to prejudice significantly the competitive position, or interfere significantly with the contractual or other negotiations of a person, group of persons, or organization; and, Section 239(2)(k) – A position, plan, procedure, criteria or instruction to be applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the municipality or local board.
Item E – Section 239(2)(f) – Advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose.

So, um, yikes! Five items and each one seems to be heavier than the one preceding it……wowza.

DELEGATIONS
Request for Exemption to Open Air Fire By-law – Peter Thyrring, Headmaster, St. Peter’s ACHS College School

It appears that Mr Thyrring will be addressing council regarding the open air fire by-law. It seems that the school applied for a permit in July, however, they were denied the permit due to being within 100 meters of a sensitive receptor (the school). It looks like he’ll be asking council for an exemption in order to be able to have a few camp fires per season. He has also requested should council refuse the exemption, that the permit fee be reimbursed.

I’ll be listening to see what council decides to do.

Zoning By-Amendment –ES Howard Ave 12R27356 Parts 2 to 4 (470- 02400)

This is a pretty lengthy report about a property on Howard Avenue that seems to be going through some zoning changes. It’s a long weekend, I’ll figure it out Tuesday night if anything gets said about it.

Committee Vacancies

It seems that there have been some more resignations from a few of the town’s committees. It seems that the vacancy for the Co-An Park Committee needs to be filled. However, the other 2 committees can continue to operate “as is” without replacing the vacancies, since council had appointed extra lay members to those committees. Here are the recommendations:

It is recommended that:
1. The vacant position on the Co-An Park Committee BE ADVERTISED;
2. The Accessibility Advisory Committee composition BE REDUCED to seven
(7) lay members; and,
3. The Seniors Advisory Committee composition BE REDUCED to six (6) lay
members and one (1) stakeholder member.

It seems that a lay person can’t sit on more than two committees during one council term, to avoid undue influence in too many committees. Diversity of thought is a goal for having a variety of people sit on the various committees.

INFORMATION REPORTS

Council receives many reports that are for information only.  That means that no action is necessary, however council can still ask questions or make motions if they chose to. I saw two that caught my eye.

Accounts Receivable – Amherstburg Festival Corporation

Back in February, council had asked for a report regarding an outstanding debt from Amherstburg Festival Corporation. It seems the bill has gone to collections and the collection agency is recommending that the debt be written off. I’ll be listening to hear if council has further comments on this issue.

Cheque Listing for the Month of September 2019

Council receives monthly cheque listing reports with all of the cheques that have been issued by the town. I try to take a look through to see if anything catches my eye. Last term, I kept an eye on legal fees, since at the beginning of the term, they seemed pretty high. I’ve stopped tallying those up this term though. I took a look through the payable report but nothing stood out to me. I’ll check again next month.

CONSENT CORRESPONDENCE

Council often receives consent correspondence too. These can be about various items from other other municipalities or organizations. Council can simply receive it or if they chose to, they can take action and support certain initiatives too.

Integrity Commissioner Matters – Town of The Blue Mountains Resolution

I found this sort of interesting. It seems that the Town of the Blue Mountains has created a resolution to create a data base regarding Integrity Commissioner decisions.

“BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED that the Code of Conduct Sub-Committee recommends that the Council of the Town of The Blue Mountains requests that the Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing create a searchable database of all matters placed before all Integrity Commissioners within the province and the resolution of such matters;
AND FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED THAT this resolution be circulated to all municipalities in Ontario via the Association of Municipalities of Ontario, Carried.”

Very interesting idea on that municipality’s part. I think this may be something to explore in Amherstburg, however I highly doubt that council will do anything with this correspondence. But who knows? I’ve been wrong before.

Then it looks like council is going back in-camera at the end of the meeting to discuss :

SPECIAL IN-CAMERA COUNCIL MEETING
That Council move back into an In-Camera Meeting of Council directly following Regular
session pursuant to Section 239 of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, for the following
reason:
Item F – Section 239(2)(b) – Personal matters about an identifiable individual, including municipal or local board employees; and, Section 239(2)(d) – Labour relations or employee negotiations.

It looks like Tuesday night will be a long one for council…..hopefully it’s not a long one for the rest of us…..and on that, I’m off to enjoy a great long weekend! See you Tuesday night!