Well, tonight’s meeting was a long one. Finished up around 8:50 when council went to go in-camera to discuss 4 items. When I arrived, it was a full house! Chambers was packed and there were even a few people standing in the lobby. There were several real estate deals I think that people were waiting to see how they would pan out and of course there were A LOT of special events that needed approval. After those two things happened, the room gradually cleared out.
**Councillor Courtney and Councillor Lavigne were absent tonight**
At the beginning of each meeting, the Mayor always asks for any declarations of pecuniary interest. Deputy Mayor DiPasquale declared a conflict regarding the minutes of previous meetings that had to do with the Windsor Police Proposal. Councillor Pouget then declared pecuniary interest regarding the minutes of previous meetings and this evenings delegation about the Windsor Police Contract. She also declared pecuniary interest regarding the new construction for the Jehovah Witness’ Church. There were a lot of pecuniary interest conflicts, I hope I caught them all.
The meeting was long, I’m going to do my darndest to sum it all up as quickly as possible. I don’t have much patience left. And even with the seat cushion, my butt was sore after almost 3 hours of sitting and my arm, well……it’s tired too. Let’s just say there was a heavy, heavy smell of politics in the air tonight……the election is looming…..
DELEGATIONS
Amherstburg Gone Car Crazy Event – Eleanor Renaud
Ms Renaud addressed council very briefly (I sure love that!!!) and showed us a fantastic promotional video for the Gone Car Crazy Event this coming summer. She also showed us a drone video that was made a few years ago. Both were AWESOME!!! Loved them!!!! I had hoped that her short, sweet, positive presentation would set the tone for the night but…..
Request for Billboard Sign Permit for 7972 County Road 9 – Merlin Warkentin
It appears that Mr. Warkentin is an owner of a property and wants to put up a bill board sign. County Road 9 is Walker Road and it seems that the “Essex side” of the road can have billboard signs to advertise their businesses. The “Amherstburg side” is not allowed billboard signs. Mr Warkentin’s son addressed council and requested permission for a billboard sign to promote their business. There was much back and forth about the sign by-law. This current council tightened up that bylaw real tight a year or more ago. Councillor Pouget reminded council that the Heritage Committee was opposed to signs as well as Communities in Bloom. Councillor Meloche said he wasn’t in favour of the bylaw restrictions added to the sign bylaw last year but he didn’t want to open a can of worms by approving this. He said he lives on Walker Road and does not find the signs intrusive. The Deputy Mayor said that he didn’t see a problem with the signs because they back up communities and business. Councillor Fryer said that he wasn’t okay to approve this issue without all of council present. (Really???? I think I did the stats on last year and how often they had the entire council present…..less than 50% of the meetings if I recall…….) Anyway, needless to say, no sign for Mr. Warkentin. The signs of how this whole thing would go down were clear long before tonight. (ha ha, get it? Punny…..I saw the sign…..)
Signage Request for 433 Sandwich St. S – Luigi DiPierdomenico, Lumed Management Inc.
Mr DiPierdomenico had some signage requests for his building (the old Burger King building). This scenario got very complicated, very quickly. He wanted a sign on the roof of his building as well as signs in the windows (covering them in their entirety). The building will eventually house 8 separate but interrelated businesses. (It sounds very impressive…..blood clinic, family doctors, radiography etc…..very impressive.) He provided the names of several local businesses that use signs on their windows. It seems that the current bylaw restricts window coverage of signs to 50%, covering the entire window is not allowed. There was A LOT of back and forth between Councillor Pouget, administration and Mr DiPierdomenico. Councillor Fryer made the motion to exempt them from several bylaws to allow the roof top sign and the window signs. There was more back and forth. Then, there was concern about grandfathering ALL of the other businesses in town (I kid you not, I could barely keep up). The CAO spoke and said how the town is looking at an urban design plan and guidelines about an abundance of advertising on walls and buildings. Councillor Pouget then withdrew her support and wanted to support the urban design guidelines. Councillor Meloche had a problem with covering more than 50% of the window. Basically, I think, (I THINK) when it all came out in the end, they approved the roof top sign but not the window signs…….if I’m wrong, I’ll correct myself. It was not an easy flowing discussion.
Local Business Concerns Regarding Switch to Windsor Police Service – Derek Didone, County Towing
Councillor Pouget and Deputy Mayor DiPasquale left during this portion due to their pecuniary interest conflict.
Mr. Didone addressed council on behalf of a few local business owners. They had concerns of how the changeover to Windsor Police Services may affect their businesses. (Towing Company and car dealerships – sales and service). They were seeking answers to the following two questions :
“What provisions will be included in the 20 year Windsor Police Contract proposal to assure local small business owners will not lose revenue to business`s outside of the Municipality?
Can we be assured that a proportionate amount of Windsor Police budgetary dollars will be spent on goods and services in this community?”
Mr Didone expressed concerns that the savings being delivered would be at their businesses expense.
The CAO addressed the questions. He said that the Windsor Police Service is privy to have their own procurement policy and that he can’t dictate to them how to go about it. He said he could talk to them and make a recommendation and see what could be done. CAO Miceli expressed that WPS has been very good to deal with so far about all of the various contract issues. He asked Mr Didone and said he wasn’t sure but how did he bid to get business with the APD. He said that the WPS tenders out their contracts and that he felt that Mr Didone or anybody could make a bid for the contract.
As for the second question, the CAO said that a local preference clause is illegal. He said that a municipality can not legally give a local preference clause.
So that was that. The meeting moved on. I still had one question……Why, oh why, were these questions not asked 3 months ago during the public consultation meetings???????
Heritage Committee Plaque Presentation for 443 Dalhousie Street- Daniel and Samantha Fox
The Fox family was presented with a heritage plaque for their home on Dalhousie Street. There was a short photo opportunity and hand shaking. Very nice!
2017 Annual Report & 2018 Budget – Richard Wyma, General Manager/Secretary- Treasurer, Essex Region Conservation Authority (ERCA)
Mr. Wyma gave his annual presentation to council. He spoke of land erosion and the challenges of climate adaptations. As most are probably aware, he also addressed our increased flooding and water shed and ERCA’s plan to deal with that. For any of you council followers, you can guess who spoke and who said what at the end of the presentation. I’ll save myself the key strokes, because you’re right!
It was now only 7:15…..
Development – Fort Street and Sandwich Street- Dante Capaldi and Ron Deneau
This was fantastic news! It appears that Mr Capaldi and Mr Deneau will be developing a 24 apartment/condominium building on the corner of Fort Street and Sandwich Street. They had a conceptual drawing and it looks very nice! They own the three houses that are currently there. Those houses will be demolished and we’ll have a beautiful brand new building! Woo hoo!
Heritage Registry Update for Properties of Interest
Heritage Properties of Interest – Best Practices
I’m lumping these 2 portions of the agenda together, because they were related and all got discussed at once. Mr Chamley, the chair of the Heritage Committee presented to council. He said that we have 56 designated properties at the moment and 166 properties of interest. The properties of interest are not designated however hold value or interest to the Town and could be used by planners for information. This also prohibits demolition of the property. If the owner of a property of interest were to want to demolish it, they would have to provide 60 days notice in writing and that allows the town time to investigate. Mr Chamley felt that the town needs a Heritage Planner even if only a part time one. Then the debate began.
Administration pointed out that it’s very costly to investigate these properties if there’s a dispute or a request. I got the feeling that the Heritage Committee and administration were not really on the same page. Mr Chamley spoke of wanting to protect all of the properties. The CAO expressed concern over lack of consultation with property owners before their property was deemed “of interest”. CAO Miceli felt it was necessary to develop standards and agreed with the position of a Heritage Planner. It got a little heated about the Boblo properties and there was mention of legal counsel, OMB hearings and other disputes. At one point the CAO said that council may become the proud owners of the all of them (meaning the properties of interest on Boblo)…..(hmmmm…..).
There was more back and forth between Mr Chamley, Councillor Fryer, Councillor Pouget and administration. Mr Chamley identified some properties of interest that were already gone (Duffy’s and the old St-John the Baptist school)…….(sorry, can’t keep my mouth shut now……Duffy’s was heritage “of interest”????? That’s a stretch to me…..and the old school??? It was built in 1950!!!! Hardly heritage I think, but what do I know?)
Anyway, finally, again I THINK council decided to leave things as is, no designations. I think. So hard to follow the constant back and forth.
I’m going to go out on a limb here…..walking on egg shells…..but this is a super touchy issue. It all comes down to who will pay to maintain these buildings????!!!!!! If I happen to have an old junky shed on my property and the Heritage Committee decides it’s a “property of interest”, now I’m stuck paying to maintain it? Or will they ?? LOL!!! But seriously! Is it fair to expect the Boblo Island developer (who quite frankly did the Town a favour by buying that island) to pay big bucks to maintain and repair old bathrooms and dodge ’em car buildings? Would the Heritage Committee be picking up the tab? I am a person who greatly appreciates history and old buildings! There’s nothing I enjoy more than touring old homes! I think it’s wonderful when someone with the means steps in and saves a house or a building, but at what point can that be imposed on people? I don’t know…..it’s complicated at best.
2018 Special Events Approval
There are several events seeking approval for 2018. This current council made it necessary for every single event to come before council for approval. So, those of you who want to have an event this year, better make your appointment to see council, before they go lame duck. Would that mean that no events can be approved once council has gone lame duck before the election? I don’t know, but if I were an event planner, I wouldn’t take any chances.
Here are the events:
- Good Friday Procession of the Cross – March 30, 2018
- Music Off the Back Porch – 2nd Friday of every month
from May 11, 2018 through to October 12, 2018 - AMBA Opening Day Parade – May 5, 2018
- Holistic Wellness Fair – May 6, 2018
- Amherstburg Rhododendron Garden Tea Party – May 27,
2018 - Ribs and Ragtime – June 2, 2018
- Woofa-Roo Pet Fest – July 21, 2018 & July 22, 2018
- Amherstburg’s Gone Car Crazy Show – July 29, 2018
- Amherstburg Uncommon – August, 3, 4 & 5, 2018
- Holiday Extravaganza Shopping Event – December 2,
2018
Several need noise exemptions, road closures and even use of the Navy Yard Park. They were all approved. Even the fees for Music Off the Back Porch got waived (I had missed that when I skimmed through the agenda)…..I thought council had said they didn’t want to waive fees anymore? Maybe they forgot.
Amherstburg Uncommon Festival
Ms Rota presented the festival coming to downtown Amherstburg for the August long weekend this year. They’re anticipating 40,000 visitors. It sounds like it will be an awesome and different festival! I can’t wait! I’ll be there.
Development Agreement for 121 Lowes Sideroad
Councillor Pouget left the room due to her pecuniary interest conflict.
From the report : “The applicant is proposing the redevelopment of the site by demolishing the existing building and the construction of a new Kingdom Hall with carport, a new monument sign and paving stone walkway at 121 Lowes Sideroad.” That sounds very nice….It looks like all is in place, including the design and even the landscaping. Lucky for them their 20 (or so) year old building wasn’t deemed a “property of interest”. This was approved quickly.
I started to drift in and out of consciousness. I was not very interested and was being a bad blogger/note taker and playing on my phone. However, when the rumble strips and the Second Concession got brought up AGAIN, I was just done. I lost any and all ability to listen and concentrate for the last 30 minutes or so of the meeting…..sorry to disappoint you, if I did. We all have our breaking point. Mine was around 8:00 when I had to hear about a certain Councillor’s personal life yet again! I just don’t get the relevance, unless he’s seeking re-election of course. Well, even then, still irrelevant in my book.
I can’t even name a councillor of the week, since only 5 of the 7 members were there tonight. The meeting finished at about 8:50 and council was going in-camera to discuss :
SPECIAL IN-CAMERA COUNCIL MEETING
ITEM A – Drainage Superintendent Proposal – Township of Pelee – Section
239(2)(d) – Labour relations or employee negotiations.
ITEM B – Belwood Poultry Limited – By-law Enforcement File # 16-0016 –
Section 239(2)(e) – Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before
administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board; and, Section
239(2)(f) – Advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including
communications necessary for that purpose.
ITEM C – Update Hobbs Litigation – Section 239(2)(e) – Litigation or potential
litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the
municipality or local board.
ITEM D – Deputy Fire Chief Update – Section 239(2)(b) – Personal matters about
an identifiable individual, including municipal or local board employees; and,
Section 239(2)(d) – Labour relations or employee negotiations.
Since I have heritage on my mind….would town hall be considered a property of interest? It’s old. I think. Maybe the chairs? They’re old for sure. And even with my wonderful seat cushion, after nearly 3 hours, they could at least win a designation for world’s most uncomfortable chairs.