Monday June 28th Regular Town council meeting

Well tonight’s meeting started very late, lasted about an hour and a half and should have been done in less than an hour. How’s that for a summary? LOL

First, council was scheduled to meet at 3:30, in-camera to discuss : 

SPECIAL IN-CAMERA COUNCIL MEETING

That Council move into an In-Camera Meeting of Council at 3:30 p.m. pursuant to Section 239 of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended for the following reasons:

Item A – Section 239(2)(d) – Labour relations or employee negotiations; and, Section 239(2)(f) – Advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose.

Item B – Section 239(2)(f) – Advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose.

Item C – Section 239(2)(i) – A trade secret or scientific, technical, commercial, financial or labour relations information, supplied in confidence to the municipality or local board, which, if disclosed, could reasonably be expected to prejudice significantly the competitive position, or interfere significantly with the contractual or other negotiations of a person, group of persons, or organization.

Item D – Section 239(2)(c) – A proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of the land by the municipality or local board.

At 6:00, I tuned in for the regular meeting…..I waited….and waited….and waited…..I told a few of my political friends that my bet was that in-camera went into Overtime…..looks like my bet was correct. 

The regular meeting started at 6:48…..it was mentioned that the in-camera meeting went longer than expected and that they would need to return in-camera after the regular meeting to discuss Item D (see above). 

There were two last-minute delegation requests. Council had to waive the rules of order to allow them to speak. 

Delegation – Delany Champagne – Canada Day Celebrations

Ms Champagne read a letter to council that was written by Sarah Jean Dorion Grant. She was requesting that council take action and cancel any celebrations for Canada Day in light of the discovery of 751 unmarked graves at the site of a former Residential School. She said she had reached out to council via e-mail and felt that this should be a period of mourning for the indigenous peoples. She explained that she has relatives that are indigineous and that the community has been through trauma. She felt it was important to be present now and show respect for the Truth and Reconciliation and Call to Action. She felt that now is a time for respect and reflection in order to rebuild relationships. She thanked council for their time and reiterated that she felt that now is a time of mourning. 

There was a motion made to receive the delegation by Councillor Renaud and seconded by Deputy Mayor Meloche. 

Councillor Prue said he would vote to receive but that he wanted to make a statement. He felt that this is a time of great pain. He explained that what the indigenous peoples had been saying for 50 years about the Residential School was in fact true and that there were children that never came home. No one listened for a long time. Councillor Prue said that he will be wearing an orange shirt on Canada Day in Remembrance of the children who never came home. He encouraged others on council to do the same. 

Councillor McArthur spoke and agreed that now is a time for reflection and education. He also said he would wear an orange t-shirt on Canada Day. He also pointed out that there isn’t much going on for Canada Day this year due to COVID. 

Mayor DiCarlo also explained that there really wasn’t any celebration for Canada Day to cancel at this time. He hoped that all Canadians would take time to learn and inform themselves about Residential Schools and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. 

The delegation thanked them for listening. Then council received the delegation. 

Delegation – Katherine Meloche and Chloe DiPasquale The Miracle Drive June 27th

Ms Meloche addressed council regarding The Miracle Drive that was done on Sunday to help feed the less fortunate. She thanked council for their support but especially CAO Miceli who made himself available and was able to secure Western High School as a depot for all of the donated goods. She said that he had done a lot to help. Ms Meloche then said that they are still in need of volunteers to sort and organize all of the donations. She thanked Mayor DiCarlo for staying and helping all day as well as Deputy Mayor Meloche, Councillor Simone, Councillor McArthur and Councillor Renaud. She then showed a live video to the screen of the gymnasium filled with the donated goods. 

Mayor DiCarlo thanked them both for organizing the food drive and reiterated that they are still in need of volunteers. Councillor Renaud inquired about the schedule and times that people would be needed. It seems that they will be working daily from 4:30 until 8:00 or 9:00, but would be starting at 9AM on Canada Day. Ms Meloche again thanked the CAO for making it possible for the school to be available for them. 

Deputy Mayor Meloche also thanked them for their work and facilitating the drop off in McGregor. Councillor Simone also thanked all of the volunteers. Councillor Courtney thanked them as well and said he had been unable to participate yesterday but that he would be there on Tuesday at 4:30 and would try to recruit others to help. 

Then the delegation was received. 

Policy Amendments – Salary Administration Policy and Annual Vacation – Non-Union Policy

It looks like the town adopted an Annual Vacation Policy in 2006 and a Salary Administration Policy in 2014. It seems that the town uses a new policy template now and that these policies require some updating. 

Regarding the Annual Vacation policy, these are the major changes as per the report : 

“The significant changes are as follows: 

  • Remove union employees from the policy scope and content as terms of agreement for annual vacation of union employees are outlined in the Collective Agreement
  • Remove automatic payment of unused vacation, clarify that requests for up to 10 days unused vacation may be requested for carryover to and use in the next calendar year, subject to approval
  • Clarify that days carried over must be used within the first ten months of the year they are carried over to 
  • Allow for payout of unused vacation in excess of 10 days to address unusual and or excessive service level demands, subject to approval”

Regarding the Salary Administration Policy, these are the significant changes as per the report : 

“The significant changes are as follows:

  • Clarify that approved inflationary increases are applied effective January 1 annually  
  • Amend section 6.15 to: 

a) provide for acting pay only where the transfer is for more than 15 consecutive working days and is to a job in a higher pay grade than the incumbent position of the employee being transferred

b) where a) applies, to provide that acting pay will be the greater of Step 1 of the salary grid for the job or a 5% increase in pay over the salary rate of the employee being transferred; however the acting pay shall not exceed the job rate (top salary band step) for the job.”

Here are the recommendations from this report : 

It is recommended that: The following policies BE AMENDED as recommended in the report from the Director of Corporate Services and Manager of Human Resources dated June 1, 2021: 1. a. Salary Administration Policy, and 

b. Annual Vacation – Non-Union Policy.

Councillor Prue made a motion to move the recommendation and Councillor McArthur seconded it. (I was impressed….but it didn’t last long…..)

Councillor Courtney said he would support the recommendation but that he had talked to administration about the recognition pay and wondered how often it is used and how it’s used. Ms Horrobin explained that it is used sparingly and that the policy was developed by a previous administration. She explained that it had been used twice and is only used as needed. She explained that the recognition pay was used if it was in excess of the top pay if the employee had gone above and beyond and really exceeded expectations on all counts. She said that in the two instances, the CAO was able to support why it should be used based on prior years performance reviews. 

Councillor Courtney felt he had concerns with recognition pay since it could be subjective and could show favouritism. He felt that it should be across the board. He then made a friendly amendment to remove recognition pay from the policy. The mover and the seconder accepted the amendment. It went to a vote…..it wasn’t recorded but I watched…

In support : Councillors Prue, McArthur, Courtney and Simone

Opposed : Deputy Mayor Meloche and Councillor Renaud

Conceptual Stormwater Management Plan for Canard Valley Estates Phase 2 Development

The Canard Valley Estates development has been discussed during the past several meetings. It’s a proposed development in the McGregor area. This proposed development has generated much discussion at the previous meetings, so we’ll see if this time is any different. Here are the recommendations as per the report : 

It is recommended that: 

1. The proposed conceptual plan to locate a Stormwater Management Pond on lands identified as Part 80 on Plan 12M527 (2.45 acres) (currently Canard Estates Park) BE SUPPORTED as part of the developer’s draft plan of subdivision application for Canard Valley Estates Subdivision Phase 2 servicing, subject to recommendation two; and,

2. The conveyance of Part 80 on Plan 12M527 (2.45 acres) to Valente Group in exchange for cash in lieu of parkland dedication at the current market value appraisal BE APPROVED and the funds be deposited into the Parkland Dedication Reserve Fund.

This time was no different…..much discussion…..parks, trails, sell a piece of the property, don’t sell a piece of the property, settling pond over here, settling pond over there…..I have pages and pages of notes…..it went on and on and on…..I’ll take a pass on this one and let the media cover it…..why? Because after ALL of the back and forth and round and round…..Deputy Mayor Meloche moved the recommendation (above), Councillor Renaud seconded it and then the rest of council voted for it. So, all in all, all of the discussion was, well, somewhat pointless I guess. Much ado for nothing. The recommendation passed as is. It seems that anything related to development is often mired in Ring Around the Rosey debate, roadblocks or delays. Tonight was Ring Around the Rosey night I guess. 

The rest of the meeting went relatively quickly. 

OTHER MINUTES

Council also has to receive the minutes of committee meetings. It looks like two committees are asking for an increase in their base budget for 2022. Council is always about cut, cut, cut at budget time…..

Heritage Committee Minutes – May 13, 2021

It is recommended that: 

  1. The minutes of the Heritage Committee meeting of May 13, 2021 BE RECEIVED;
  2. Administration BE DIRECTED to investigate 24 Sandwich Street South for a possible heritage designation; and,
  3. The request from the Heritage Committee to increase their base budget from $3,000 to $4,500 BE CONSIDERED during the 2022 budget deliberations

Deputy Mayor Meloche wondered why an increase from $3,000 to $4,500 was needed. Councillor Simone is the council representative on that committee. She explained that there will be a document coming forward at budget time explaining the request. It seems it will have to do with plaques and some training for committee members. Ms Rubli explained that a Heritage Planner has been hired and will begin work on July 12th and that that person will be providing more reports on this issue. 

The motion carried. 

Amherstburg Accessibility Advisory Committee Minutes – May 20, 2021 

It is recommended that: 

  1. The Amherstburg Accessibility Advisory Committee Minutes of May 20, 2021 BE RECEIVED; and, 
  2. The request from the Amherstburg Accessibility Advisory Committee to increase their base budget from $1500 to $2000 BE CONSIDERED during the 2022 budget deliberations.

This item carried with no discussion. 

UNFINISHED BUSINESS

Councillor Prue said that council had received emails about the noise bylaw this week and some complaints that were made. He wondered when that bylaw would be coming before council. Ms Rubli, Director of Planning and Development services explained that this is a complex file. She has a draft form of the bylaw on her desk and that it will likely go to council and public consultation in the third quarter. 

NEW BUSINESS

Councillor Prue said he had received an inquiry from a resident of Boblo. (shocking I know) He said that the resident had been told that Enbridge was supposed to be coming to provide natural gas services on the island but that the developer had said no. CAO Miceli said that that was news to him since the developer wouldn’t have authority about natural gas provisions and that as far as he is aware, Enbridge will be providing services to the island. 

Councillor McArthur then spoke and said that music would be coming back to the Kings Navy Yard Park as part of phase 2 of the province’s reopening plan. He talked about how great it was that Minnie Mouse was downtown this weekend and that there was yoga in the park on Sunday morning. (I couldn’t agree more!!! So awesome to see our downtown bustling with happy faces!) He wanted the public to know that music in the Park on Sunday afternoons would be back as of this coming weekend. So, go out and enjoy!

And with that, the meeting wrapped up at 8:24 PM and then council was going to finish their in-camera meeting, that they had started at 3:30. 

So, on that note, that’s it, that’s all folks. Have a great week! Hope to see everyone out enjoying Open Air Weekends this weekend! I’ve been able to get out and enjoy them so far and I plan on being out enjoying them all summer long! 

In preparation for Monday June 28th Regular town council meeting

Well this week’s agenda is a slim 150 pages with no content that seems too earth shattering. Sooooo…..if this meeting doesn’t wrap up in an hour, I think “Houston, we have a problem.” 

First, council will meet in-camera starting at 3:30 PM to discuss the following : 

SPECIAL IN-CAMERA COUNCIL MEETING

That Council move into an In-Camera Meeting of Council at 3:30 p.m. pursuant to Section 239 of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended for the following reasons:

Item A – Section 239(2)(d) – Labour relations or employee negotiations; and, Section 239(2)(f) – Advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose.

Item B – Section 239(2)(f) – Advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose.

Item C – Section 239(2)(i) – A trade secret or scientific, technical, commercial, financial or labour relations information, supplied in confidence to the municipality or local board, which, if disclosed, could reasonably be expected to prejudice significantly the competitive position, or interfere significantly with the contractual or other negotiations of a person, group of persons, or organization.

Item D – Section 239(2)(c) – A proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of the land by the municipality or local board.

The regular meeting is supposed to start at 6:00. Here are some of the highlights for the regular meeting. 

Policy Amendments – Salary Administration Policy and Annual Vacation – Non-Union Policy

It looks like the town adopted an Annual Vacation Policy in 2006 and a Salary Administration Policy in 2014. It seems that the town uses a new policy template now and that these policies require some updating. 

Regarding the Annual Vacation policy, these are the major changes as per the report : 

“The significant changes are as follows: 

  • Remove union employees from the policy scope and content as terms of agreement for annual vacation of union employees are outlined in the Collective Agreement
  • Remove automatic payment of unused vacation, clarify that requests for up to 10 days unused vacation may be requested for carryover to and use in the next calendar year, subject to approval
  • Clarify that days carried over must be used within the first ten months of the year they are carried over to 
  • Allow for payout of unused vacation in excess of 10 days to address unusual and or excessive service level demands, subject to approval”

Regarding the Salary Administration Policy, these are the significant changes as per the report : 

“The significant changes are as follows:

  • Clarify that approved inflationary increases are applied effective January 1 annually  
  • Amend section 6.15 to: 

a) provide for acting pay only where the transfer is for more than 15 consecutive working days and is to a job in a higher pay grade than the incumbent position of the employee being transferred

b) where a) applies, to provide that acting pay will be the greater of Step 1 of the salary grid for the job or a 5% increase in pay over the salary rate of the employee being transferred; however the acting pay shall not exceed the job rate (top salary band step) for the job.”

Here are the recommendations from this report : 

It is recommended that: The following policies BE AMENDED as recommended in the report from the Director of Corporate Services and Manager of Human Resources dated June 1, 2021: 1. a. Salary Administration Policy, and 

b. Annual Vacation – Non-Union Policy.

It will be interesting to hear certain members of council’s commentary on these items. I’ll be listening closely.

Conceptual Stormwater Management Plan for Canard Valley Estates Phase 2 Development

The Canard Valley Estates development has been discussed during the past several meetings. It’s a proposed development in the McGregor area. This proposed development has generated much discussion at the previous meetings, so we’ll see if this time is any different. Here are the recommendations as per the report : 

It is recommended that: 

1. The proposed conceptual plan to locate a Stormwater Management Pond on lands identified as Part 80 on Plan 12M527 (2.45 acres) (currently Canard Estates Park) BE SUPPORTED as part of the developer’s draft plan of subdivision application for Canard Valley Estates Subdivision Phase 2 servicing, subject to recommendation two; and,

2. The conveyance of Part 80 on Plan 12M527 (2.45 acres) to Valente Group in exchange for cash in lieu of parkland dedication at the current market value appraisal BE APPROVED and the funds be deposited into the Parkland Dedication Reserve Fund.

I’ll be listening to see how welcome (or not) new development really is to Amherstburg. 

CONSENT CORRESPONDENCE

There are 4 items of consent correspondence for council to receive. They can also discuss and support any items if they are interested to do so. 

OTHER MINUTES

Council also has to receive the minutes of committee meetings. It looks like two committees are asking for an increase in their base budget for 2022. Council is always about cut, cut, cut at budget time…..

Heritage Committee Minutes – May 13, 2021

It is recommended that: 

  1. The minutes of the Heritage Committee meeting of May 13, 2021 BE RECEIVED;
  2. Administration BE DIRECTED to investigate 24 Sandwich Street South for a possible heritage designation; and,
  3. The request from the Heritage Committee to increase their base budget from $3,000 to $4,500 BE CONSIDERED during the 2022 budget deliberations

Amherstburg Accessibility Advisory Committee Minutes – May 20, 2021 

It is recommended that: 

  1. The Amherstburg Accessibility Advisory Committee Minutes of May 20, 2021 BE RECEIVED; and, 
  2. The request from the Amherstburg Accessibility Advisory Committee to increase their base budget from $1500 to $2000 BE CONSIDERED during the 2022 budget deliberations.

Drainage Board Meeting Minutes – June 21, 2021

It is recommended that: 

  1. The Drainage Board Meeting Minutes of June 21, 2021, BE RECEIVED; and,
  2. By-law 2021-041 being a by-law to Provide for the Abandonment of Part of the 2nd Concession Drain based on the Drainage Report by RC Spencer Associates Inc. BE PROVISIONALLY ADOPTED by giving first and second reading and the Mayor and Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to sign same.

UNFINISHED BUSINESS

During this portion of the meeting, council members can ask questions about items that are on the unfinished business list. Some members of council like to go through them one by one. These are often the same members that ask for yet more reports at each meeting. And then they wonder why the unfinished business list just gets longer and longer and longer…..

NEW BUSINESS

And finally, at the end of each meeting, members of council can bring up any new business items. Generally, it could be well, anything, anything at all. It could be a random phone call that was received or an email…..it could be something quite minor, fairly major or anywhere in between…..generally, this is where the meetings bogs down into reverse LOL. 

And that’s it, that’s all folks! Based on this slim agenda, I should be back Monday night with the post-meeting blog…..but one never knows…..either way, I’ll be back sometime next week with the summary! I’ll see you then!

Monday June 14th Regular town council meeting

Well Monday night’s meeting was another long one, so here I am writing up the post meeting blog on a Tuesday night…..When they made the motion just before 10:00 PM to extend the meeting until 11:00, I had had about enough, so I logged out. It was a long (and sometimes painful) meeting in many ways. 

First, council met at 4:00 for a special meeting. There was only one item on the agenda. 

PRESENTATION

Community Safety and Well-Being Plan, Engagement & Project Update – Leonardo Gil, Project Manager, City of Windsor

I didn’t watch this meeting. 

Then, council met again at 5:00 for a planning meeting. I didn’t watch that one either. For anybody who has ever watched or attended a planning meeting, you will certainly understand why. 🙂 

The regular meeting started up right on time at 6:00 PM. 

The following item was moved up on the agenda:

PRESENTATIONS

2021 Initiatives and 2021-2022 Official Visitor Guide – Gordon Orr, CEO, Lynnette Bain, Vice President, and Jason Toner, Director of Marketing and Communications, Tourism Windsor Essex Pelee Island (TWEPI)

It seems that the people from TWEPI had another presentation to make last night to Kingsville town council, so they presented right away at 6:00. 

Mr Orr spoke first about how tourism and hospitality was hit first and hit hard by the pandemic and they will take a long period of time to recover. However, he was hopeful that there will be better days ahead. He spoke of the importance of planning for the better days that are coming and that we need to be ready because tourism is important. He explained their mission, the organizational chart, the board of Directors and how their areas of focus pivoted and changed due to the pandemic. Ms Baine spoke next and explained TWEPI’s new initiatives for the upcoming year. Mr Toner also spoke about staycations and the Official Visitor Guide. It seems that there will be a Support Local Campaign as well as a campaign to encourage two night stays at local hotels. They also showed a short video with a focus on Windsor/Essex attractions. 

Councillor McArthur spoke about the downtown hotel and that it is coming! He wondered what type of boost Amherstburg could expect once the hotel is built and operational. One of the representatives from TWEPI said that hotel marketing packages are up to the individual hotel operator but that he was also excited for Amherstburg to have a hotel. He explained that the longer that people stay in town, the more money that they spend. 

Mayor DiCarlo expressed his thanks for TWEPI’s support and their initiatives. And then the presentation was received. 

DELEGATIONS

Solar Power Grant Funding, Green Inclusive Community Building Program – Daren Crawford, Otter Energ

I’m just going to say, right off the bat, I did not find this delegation to be very interesting and it was very difficult to follow. It seems that there is grant money available for solar power. It looked like this company wanted to apply for grant money and enter into a contract with Amherstburg to install solar panels on the arena. Mr Crawford shared his screen with columns and columns of numbers, but I could not see the numbers on my screen, since they were tiny. That made it even more difficult to follow. 

I actually honestly started to nod off during the presentation. After what seemed like an eternity, Mayor DiCarlo interjected and said that they had to wrap up the delegation in order to respect the 5 minute time limit. (I got a text from a friend that said she was never so happy to hear that in her life! LOL)

So, just when I thought that council would just receive the delegation and move on…..no…..Deputy Mayor Meloche started asking questions and throwing around percentages. (I silently hoped for technical difficulties, but no luck….) At 6:49 PM, Councillor Prue asked the CAO if this presentation had been solicited or not by town administration. The CAO explained that the delegation was not solicited and that he was there to make a sale. He corrected some of the numbers that were thrown around during the presentation and said that he would advise against council entering into an agreement for solar panels in this particular situation. 

There was more back and forth, then Councillor Prue made a motion to receive the delegation. (I was happy but only for a brief moment…..) Then, Councillor Prue added to the motion to have the Environmental Committee take a look at the presentation and that staff come back to council about a bidding process. The CAO explained that the town already has a solar power agreement with Essex Powerlines at the Libro Centre and that they would have to look at the policy. 

Then, Councillor Prue made a motion to receive the delegation, ask staff to prepare a report going forward about solar energy for future build outs and how it can be properly done regarding tenders and also to send the report to the Environmental Committee for comment. 

There was some more back and forth about which buildings this could apply to. There actually was a bit of technical difficulty (maybe just at my end, that the sound cut out) and then the motion carried. It was 6:59 PM. 

Rainbow Crosswalk Proposal – Linden Crain, Amherstburg Resident

Mr Crain delegated next to council about installing a rainbow crosswalk to build a more inclusive Amherstburg. He felt that it is important to be accepting of others and that this initiative coincides with National Pride Month. He talked about last year’s TRUE festival, put on by the town of Amherstburg, as well as initiatives being undertaken by the Town of LaSalle and the University of Windsor. He also cited a survey done by the Amherstburg Community Foundation where 50% of the respondents felt that Amherstburg sometimes does enough to promote inclusivity. Mr Crain advised that 30 municipalities in Ontario have a rainbow crosswalk at this time. He felt that it benefits the residents, helps reduce vehicle speed and enhanced public spaces. He felt that this initiative would be a great addition for public art. He cited some estimated costs. It seems that installing a rainbow sidewalk with thermoplastic paint would cost around $15,000 and would last about 5 to 7 years. Or asphalt paint could be used at an estimated cost of $1,000 but would only last about 1 to 2 years. He mentioned his preferred location for the rainbow crosswalk was at the Town Square at Dalhousie Street and Richmond Street. 

Councillor Prue spoke and mentioned that there is currently a policy underway regarding public art and wondered if council should wait for the policy to be ready. 

Councillor Renaud felt that it was an idea worth looking at and felt that the new high school could be a good place to install the rainbow sidewalk to promote inclusivity. He felt that the policy would be necessary to help council decide where to locate potential rainbow sidewalks. 

Councillor McArthur expressed his support for the idea. He said that Windsor has a policy where the person bringing forward the project is responsible to fundraise and pay for the crosswalk. He said that council had received an email suggesting possible areas for rainbow sidewalks. Councillor McArthur wondered about the status of the policy. 

The Clerk explained that the draft policy is underway and that Senior Management is expected to review it at the end of this month. Afterwards, it would then come before council. 

Councillor Simone expressed that she was also in favour of the idea but was not so sure about Mr Crain’s proposed location. (I saw an idea on social media about placing it at the Richmond and Sandwich Street intersection and personally, I think that would be a great location.)

Deputy Mayor Meloche said he was also in favour but felt that council keeps embarking on new issues when there are people out there that just want a sidewalk in McGregor. He felt that council keeps adding things and aren’t dealing with other issues. 

Councillor Courtney spoke next. He mentioned having watched Mr Crain’s podcast episodes and noted he hadn’t yet been invited to be on his show. (Um, no comment.) Councillor Courtney then went on about how he knows Mr Crain’s father and his brother and knows that Mr Crain was born and raised in Amherstburg. He felt that the presentation was well done and that council has policies that they need to follow. He then went on about needs and wants. He felt that a lot of money goes into beautification and that he likes art but that council must wait for the policy to be finished. Councillor Courtney then went on to state that Amherstburg is very inclusive and offers total inclusion. ( I found that to be a very interesting yet troubling comment. I think Amherstburg still has a ways to go to be “very inclusive”. In fact, statements about knowing Mr Crain’s family and that he was raised in Amherstburg seem to point to the opposite of inclusivity. Why should it matter where the delegate grew up? Why should it matter if a member of council knows a person’s family or not? I feel that statements like that do not promote inclusivity at all and seem to place importance on people based on if they are “from Amherstburg” or not. In my opinion, that is not very inclusive at all. It seems to border on the “old boys club” mentality, which needs to be left in the past.). Councillor Courtney then talked about council needing to look at cost for upkeep and life expectancy for the rainbow crosswalk and that they have to do their due diligence. 

Councillor McArthur then spoke and was hopeful that the policy would include language that the expense for the project would be borne by the people initiating the project, as is being done in Windsor and in LaSalle too, I believe. He felt that public art is safe and important. He felt that there would be a greater appetite for the idea if it were not being funded by general taxation dollars. 

Mr Crain said that he would be happy to come back with cash in hand. He said that since his idea was promoted in the media and on social media, many residents and businesses had reached out to him and were willing to donate financially to see the project come to fruition. 

Councillor Prue mentioned that Mr Crain is a member of the Amherstburg Community Foundation and wondered if they would be interested in fundraising for this initiative, since people can also get a tax receipt for donating. 

Then, a motion to receive was made and it carried.

Indigenous Peoples Flag Proposal – Linden Crain, Amherstburg Resident

Mr Crain then delegated once again to council about a proposal to install two indigenous peoples flags in the King’s Navy Yard Park. Mr Crain explained that prior to the settlement of Amherstburg, there were several indigenous groups living in this area. The flags would be to honour the Three Fires Confederacy (Ojibwe, Odawa and Potawatomi peoples as well as the Huron-Wendat and the Wyandot peoples). Mr Crain noted that there are currently five flags in our town square. He proposed that the flags honouring the indigeous peoples could either be added to the group of five flags or could be hung on two empty flag poles located near the Commissariat building in the Navy Yard Park. He said he had already reached out to the First Nations about his idea. He showed a picture for two possible flags but mentioned that an artist may be required to design a flag honouring the Three Fires Confederacy. 

CAO Miceli said he had been in a meeting last week with other area CAOs about this very issue. He said it was very important to seek input and to consult with the groups of First Nations regarding the flags and how they would want to be recognized and honoured. 

Councillor Prue spoke and he agreed that the First Nations people must be consulted about this initiative. He spoke of an organization that represents people that live off reserve as well. He felt it was very important to consult with as many groups as possible and wanted everybody involved in the decision. 

Councillor Pure made a motion for administration to convene a meeting for First Nations peoples, both on and off reserve and to get their input about installing flags in Amherstburg. Deputy Mayor Meloche made a friendly amendment to add the item to the 2022 budget. (Good call!) And the motion carried. 

Paving for Fire Stations 2 and 3

Council had a report before them regarding paving news for Fire Stations 2 and 3. They had to make a choice for Station 3, either option 1 or option 2 (see below). 

Here are the recommendations :

1. An over-expenditure not to exceed $87,000 including net HST for an additional 2021 Capital Project in the Facilities budget centre to provide asphalt repaving at Fire Station 2, as shown in the attachment to the report from the Director, Community & Protective Services dated June 1, 2021, BE APPROVED and BE FUNDED by a transfer from Reserve Fund – General; 

2. An over-expenditure in the Facilities budget centre Fire Station 3 BE APPROVED for either: a. Option one: A 2021 Capital Project to replace asphalt and concrete pavement at a cost not to exceed $123,000 including net HST, to be funded by a transfer from Reserve Fund – General; OR,

b. Option two: Facility Maintenance expense for concrete and asphalt pavement repairs in selective areas at a cost not to exceed $20,500 including net HST, to be funded from current taxation. 

Deputy Mayor Meloche made the motion to approve the item for Station 2 and to go with Option two for Fire Station three. (It’s the cheaper option noted above). 

There was A LOT of back and forth. Councillor Courtney wondered how administration comes up with the prices for the work. He felt that a truck, a saw and some cement would be much cheaper and again questioned how they came up with these numbers. The Fire Chief spoke and somebody (I’m not sure who) from administration spoke as well. After a lot of back and forth, the motion carried. Sometimes I think that people like to hear their own voices. 

Amherstburg Destination River Cruises

This item has been discussed before during council meetings. There are River cruises that come from Windsor to Amherstburg through the summer months. It looks like administration is looking for permission to negotiate a contract for the ships to stop in Amherstburg to allow people to disembark for a few hours and spend time in our beautiful town. The dates are still somewhat tentative due to COVID regulations and depending on the re-opening phases allowed by the province. 

Councillor Prue said he was very supportive of the initiative but wondered if there was a way for the town to recoup the costs of selling tickets. Administration said it is all done online therefore, there aren’t any costs to recuperate. Councillor McArthur and Deputy mayor Meloche seemed pleased to hear that there were no costs involved to the town for this initiative. Councillor McArthur wondered if dock space had to be freed up and if people would still be able to fish when the boat is moored. It was explained that the boat would moor north of the fishing pier and that people would still be able to fish at the fishing pier. 

The motion was made to enter into the agreement and it carried. 

Approval for Grant Funding, Applications and Donations for Community Gardens and Active Transportation Initiatives 

I believe that this item was in the supplementary agenda that I did not read. I had written my pre-meeting blog on Thursday night so that I could enjoy our first Open Air Weekend! The supplementary agenda came out on Saturday. I did my best to keep up. Here are the recommendations : 

1. The following capital projects, related over-expenditures and funding sources BE APPROVED OR AFFIRMED as outlined in the report from the Director of Community and Protective Services dated June 8, 2021: 

a. Eighteen(18) Planter Boxes (10 GREEN CIRCLE Accessible boxes and 8 wooden boxes) for Community Gardens at 320 Richmond at a cost not to exceed $22,000 including net HST, to be funded by a grant of $12,000 from Amherstburg Community Foundation and a Federal Enabling Accessibility Fund – Youth Innovation Grant of up to $10,000; 

b. Bike Repair Stations (2) and Bike Racks with Concrete Pads (4) at a cost not to exceed $33,000 including net HST, to be funded by grants from the County of Essex (CWATS Municipal Partnership Program) of up to $16,500 and a Transfer from Reserve – New Capital of up to $16,500; and, 

c. Outdoor Furniture and Fixtures (3 picnic tables, 5 picnic tables with benches, 10 planter stands and 50 bollards) at a cost not to exceed $20,000 including net HST, to be funded by a grant from the Southwest Ontario Tourism Corporation – Tourism Adaptation Fund of up to $20,000.

I quickly skimmed through the report to try to figure out what was going on. Councillor Courtney wondered why council isn’t apprised of grant applications and grant funding. Administration explained that there are often very short time frames, sometimes a matter of days. There was some back and forth. It seemed to me that Councillor Courtney wanted administration to ask council for permission each time they were to make a grant application. He felt that there was a lot of information in the report and that he wanted council to be kept apprised of grant applications. (I’m not sure if he realizes that council meets every 2 or 3 weeks and that they work on a very part time basis…..administration works full time and that their job is to seek grant funding when possible…..but I digress…..) 

Councillor McArthur said that he was very supportive of this initiative. He saw the great pictures from Open Air weekend with people in their full biking gear. He talked about the location for the bike repairs centres. 

There was a lot more back and forth…..quite a bit anyway. I’m going to save myself some key strokes. If you’re interested, the video is posted on line. 

Mayor DiCarlo thanked the Youth Advisory Committee for spearheading the grant application and for doing a lot of work to make these initiatives happen. He also thanked the Amherstburg Community Foundation for topping up the funding for these initiatives. 

And finally, the motion was made for the recommendations (noted above) and it carried. 

Request for a Building Inspector/Plans Examiner Staff Position

It seems that there is a lot of work to be done in the building department and there’s not enough staff to get it all done. Administration is looking for council’s approval to hire a full time building inspector/plans examiner. I had included a chart in my pre-meeting blog if you didn’t see it. It comes from the full report. Here’s the link to the report :

https://pub-amherstburg.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=3282

Councillor Courtney was the first to speak. He felt “frustrated” with the report. He felt that council has a budget season where administration presents the wants, the needs and the dreams. (Why shouldn’t we receive some “dreams” like a developed Duffy’s waterfront and a Libro Master Plan with amenities? ) Councillor Courtney felt that this was a position that was finally needed and he liked the comparative chart that was included in the report. He said that he had reached out to the Building department and wondered why the $10,000 that council had budgeted for them was inadequate. 

Mr Angelo Aviolo, the Chief Building Official, explained that the department is swamped. He said that they are overwhelmed with the amount of work that needs to be done and that all of the inspections are a daunting task for one person to get to. He said that some of the $10,000 had been used but that inspections are in great need and take a lot of time to perform. Mr Aviolo explained that Kingsbridge is booming and another portion will be opening in a month or so. As well, if and when the subdivision in McGregor comes to be, that will require even more inspections and some extra travel time. 

Councillor Courtney felt that the budget time is an important time for debating new staff positions. (I guess he forgot that many of the positions get denied year after year after year…..since well, they’re perceived as “wants” or “dreams” I guess….) Councillor Courtney felt that using money to hire third party inspectors would be fine for now and council could debate the position later. He wondered how much it would cost. 

Mr Aviolo said at 3 days per week, it would cost around $8,000 or $10,000 per month but he pointed out that the department is busy all year long. 

Councillor Courtney felt he wanted to find an amount to band aid fix the problem through the busy season and wondered if $20,000 would be enough. Mr Aviolo said that maybe that would carry them through to September but that it depends on the Kingsbridge development. 

Councillor Renaud noted that the report talked about employees vacation time and was concerned about employees not getting their vacation time due to being short staffed. 

Ms Rubli explained that the real issues are the increased workload and the vacation time. She explained that the cost of the position is covered by the inspection fees, therefore, it is not borne by the taxpayer. She said that there are many challenges and development is happening throughout the municipality and require some travel times, for example, McGregor and Boblo in particular. She also noted that the town must meet the legislative requirements of the Building Act. 

Ms Horrobin explained that under the Building Code Act that the fees collected for inspections can ONLY be used for providing building services. 

(It was becoming quite clear, at least to me, what the right decision to make should be…..but the debate dragged on and on…..) 

Councillor Prue felt he preferred to wait until November to look at the new position in comparison with other positions requested. 

(I took the following from the report….it’s a list of current and near future development for Amherstburg. 

“The following is a list of the top eight projects that are ongoing and other projects anticipated to begin within the next 3 years: 

  •  General Amherst High School (Permit issued in 4th quarter 2020) 
  • Greenhouse project – 3 rd Concession N. (Permit issued)
  • Phase 10 – Kingsbridge Subdivision (Construction work underway)
  • Hunt Club Creek Subdivision & South East Quadrant (1,400 homes)
  • Long Term Care Facility at 320 Richmond
  • Phase 2 – Canard Estates Subdivision 
  • Proposed Development of Woodland Trails
  • South End Boblo Development
  • Proposed Hotel in Downtown Area 
  • Proposed New Greenhouse Project
  • Proposed 120 Unit Residential Apartment Building
  • Proposed Assisted Living Facility 
  • Redevelopment of the House Youth Centre & Proposed Condo Development
  • Proposed Condo Development at Fort & Sandwich
  • Proposed Waterfront Condo Development
  • Proposed Luxury Apartment on Sandwich”

Councillor Prue then went on to question each of the proposed projects….

The CAO explained that the budget came out during the pandemic and nobody could have anticipated that there would be a huge building boom. In fact, many thought the opposite would happen. The CAO explained that Amherstburg is a place of choice right now and that the next phase of Kingsbridge will open up 184 more building lots. CAO Miceli said that the builders have presold many homes and that they will be built, that it’s not a case of “if” but “when”.

Councillor Prue continued to question each proposed project and seemed to feel that since they weren’t happening before November, the position could wait until budget time for approval. (I guess it didn’t matter that the fees collected pay for the position???)

The CAO again tried to explain that there was an immediate pressure on the Building Department and that more development is coming. He explained that they can’t keep up with the workload now. He explained the difficulties to inspect 18 homes in an 8 hour day and that the inspections do not take 5 or 10 minutes. He said that the inspections are necessary to protect the residents and the public safety. 

Again, Councillor Prue went through the items that are coming…..I’m going to stop here…..if you want to hear it all, take a listen. 

Councillor McArthur then spoke. He felt it was important to note that the position pays for itself through the building inspection fees. He also felt that the Service Delivery Review had identified some required positions but this position had not been listed in that review. He wondered why. 

CAO Miceli said a contract position had initially been identified. He explained that during the pandemic, administration had thought that building development would stop, yet the total opposite happened. He said that people are working from home, finding different needs and are building new homes. He also pointed out that fibre internet is available in the entire town and we have a lot of amenities to offer. The CAO said that nobody had any idea what the pandemic had in store in regards to the building boom. He explained that they were being conservative with the budget and now the town is growing exponentially. 

Councillor Courtney wondered if this position had been discussed before the budget. 

The CAO explained that they did not think this could happen. Even now, the price of lumber is so expensive, yet the construction is not slowing down. 

Councillor Courtney felt that if he had written the report, he would have given the numbers by month, rather than by year. He felt that a third party inspector could fill the void. He went on to say that he felt that the chart in the report was beautiful and that the Service Delivery Review did not provide that (charts). He felt the comparators in the chart were good. (As someone who has read the Service Delivery Review, more than once now, the comparisons are all there. Amherstburg was compared to several other peer municipalities. It may not have been done in chart form, and rather in paragraph form, but the comparators are all there…..) 

Deputy Mayor Meloche felt that the Chief Building Official had said he needed help and that he was drowning and that council doesn’t want to recognize that. (100%. I wonder if members of council and their needs are ignored by their employers at their day jobs? Just a thought. Council sure seems to ignore town staff’s cries for help….) Deputy Mayor Meloche pointed out that the building boom has been beyond any expectations. He felt it was important to support and help the employees when they say that they need help. He also pointed out, again, that this is not a taxpayer funded position. He felt that council should be good leaders and give help to staff since it would be to the town’s benefit. 

Councillor Simone said she had come into the meeting thinking she wouldn’t support the position but upon hearing Mr Aviolo and the discussion she felt she would support it. She felt she would have liked to see the position at the budget deliberations but did see that the position would not cost tax dollars. 

Councillor Courtney agreed that they need help. He felt he wanted to see final numbers and wished that the landscape for this position had been laid out in the budget. (I guess he missed the gazillion times it was mentioned how nobody anticipated a massive building boom during the pandemic….). He confirmed that this new position would be a permanent, unionized position. And then…..wait for it….he made a motion to take $30,000 from the Building Services department to fund third party inspectors. Councillor Prue seconded the motion. 

Deputy Mayor Meloche spoke in disagreement. He wondered what the department would do when the $30,000 ran out by October. 

Councillor Courtney felt that the department had pounded out 257 inspections and that they had pulled it off last year. He felt that the numbers between 2020 and 2021 were close. He felt it would be okay to throw the department $30,000 until council can see the final numbers for 2021. He mentioned that if it came back in October, then maybe council could extend another $10,000. 

Deputy Mayor Meloche explained that the numbers were not close. The 257 inspections that had been done by the end of May showed a 35% increase from 2020 to 2021. 

Councillor McArthur felt it had been a good debate but he wanted to support the administrative recommendation to hire a permanent full time inspector. He felt it was important to support staff and protect the residents with top of the line inspections. He felt it was important that inspections were done properly and not quickly and that a positive message needs to be sent to developers that Amherstburg can provide inspections and development. He also felt it was a good idea to spend money to have succession planning and in-house knowledge rather than hire contractors. 

Councillor Courtney’s motion went to an unrecorded vote. (To just throw $30,000 at the building department to provide contractor supported inspections). 

In support : Councillors Courtney and Prue

Opposed : Councillors Renaud, McArthur, Simone and Deputy Mayor Meloche. 

Then, Deputy Mayor Meloche made the motion as per the recommendation to hire an inspector. It carried in an unrecorded vote. 

In Support : Councillors Renaud, McArthur, Simone and Deputy Mayor Meloche

Opposed : Councillors Courtney and Prue. 

(Side note, for any of my readers who are pro-development and realize the importance of growth and development, remember those votes.)

Temporary Relocation of Amherstburg Skateboard Park

This item was on the supplementary agenda as well, so I did not read it in advance. I was quickly skimming through the report during the debate. 

Here was the recommendation as per the report : 

1. The Town’s skateboard park be temporarily relocated to an interim location at 320 Richmond Street until a permanent location is approved; and, 

2. A 2021 capital project and related over-expenditure for construction of an asphalt pad to temporarily house the skateboard park as an extension to the parking lot at the rear of the 320 Richmond facility BE APPROVED at a total cost not to exceed $75,000 including net HST, to be funded by a transfer from Reserve – Capital New for capital costs and from current taxation for operating costs. 

Here’s the link to the report : https://pub-amherstburg.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=3286

Here’s the link to the map with the two possibilities for the skate park at 320 Richmond Street :

https://pub-amherstburg.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=3287

Deputy Mayor Meloche didn’t seem thrilled with the cost of $75,000 to temporarily move the skate park. He mentioned an email received from the Amherstburg Community Services and how the construction will impact their activities. 

CAO Miceli explained that council will have to decide where to locate the pavement. He noted that this is a temporary measure and that in the long run, the pavement will provide additional parking for the ACS in the future, once the skate park is moved to it’s permanent home (where ever that may be.). He advised that the town has worked with the ACS in the past, in the present and will continue to work with them in the future. 

Councillor Courtney inquired about a time line for a tender and felt that the ACS would only be inconvenienced for about 4 days during construction. 

Ms Heidi Baillargeon, Director of Community and Protective Services spoke. She explained that a tender would be sent out and then is posted for 7 days. She also said that they will work with ACS to ensure that their driveway is accessible for their programming. 

Councillor Prue asked about the parking area. Ms Baillargeon said that the new pavement would provide ACS with parking in the future. 

Councillor McArthur felt that he preferred option 2 (locating the skate park in the north west area at 320 Richmond Street) but was concerned about the time line for it to come to fruition. He wondered how long until the skate park would be up and running. 

Ms Baillargeon said that they would have to create the RFP, make it available for 7 days, evaluate the proposals, then get the work done. That would all take at least a month or a month and a half. (And factor in the weather too…..)

CAO Miceli explained that council has a procurement policy that must be adhered to. However, he explained that sometimes, in very extenuating circumstances, that the procurement policy can be waived, although he did not recommend it. He felt that should council decide to do that, he could work with the current bidder that had bid on resurfacing a different area of 320 Richmond and that this would be the only way to get the job done more quickly. 

Councillor McArthur made a motion to waive the procurement policy. He felt that there was plenty of blame to go around, that the skate park was not ready yet. He felt that the kids have suffered and he wanted to get the kids back to the skate park ASAP. He felt that a tender for pavement had already been made for land that the town does not own, so waiving the procurement policy to put the pavement on town owned land would be okay and get the park ready faster. 

Deputy Mayor Meloche explained that he felt that caution was required. He explained that the previous council had gone outside of their procurement policy for an item of $12,000 regarding the high school and they were reemed for it. (Yup. They did and they were heavily criticized for it and rightfully so. However, those circumstances were ENTIRELY different…..I think the last council had waived their procurement policy for that item out of pure political favour, a very different motivation than what was at stake at tonight’s meeting. But that’s a story for another day……for anybody who was following town politics in February 2015, you can go back and see what happened….)

CAO Miceli agreed that council could face criticism but that he felt confident he could get the work done immediately, if the procurement policy were waived. 

Councillor Prue then spoke about recalling with clarity one time that the RFP wasn’t followed when he was in Toronto. He explained that some computers were purchased, then they didn’t work and it lead to an inquiry with people yelling about the issue years later. He went on that he felt that the procurement policy should be set in stone and should be followed. He said he could not support the motion to waive the procurement policy, that it’s not the right thing to do and that the kids will have to understand. 

Councillor McArthur said he disagreed and felt that waiving the procurement policy was the right thing to do. He felt that the kids had been promised the skate park and that council had failed the kids. It seems some parents are driving their kids out of town to other skate parks and Councillor McArthur felt that was unacceptable. He also said he did not care what happened in Toronto 20 years ago! (I think I actually laughed out loud at home. Finally, somebody said it! We have been enduring stories about what happened back in the day in Toronto for 2 and a half years……and there was the truth! Nobody cares! We’re tired of hearing about it!) Councillor McArthur went on that council waives rules of order or other items all the time. There was then a VERY heated “discussion” between Councillor McArthur and Councillor Prue about what the CAO had said or not said……(totally worth watching for anybody that’s interested.)

Councillor Courtney then spoke. He felt that Councillor McArthur had made some good points and that council did fail and things got shuffled down. However, he said that he could not support waiving the procurement policy as it is extremely important. He then felt that the CAO was elusive in his wording and wondered what he recommended. 

CAO Miceli explained that the procurement policy is in place to protect the taxpayer but a waiver of the policy would allow the project to proceed. He felt that it was exceptional circumstances for the kids in this situation. He wanted to get this project done before June 21st. 

Councillor Courtney wondered if it was good practice to waive the procurement policy. The CAO agreed that it’s not good practice but that he’s seen the pressure and that the kids are very unhappy and that overall, the risk is low in this situation. 

Finally, the motion to waive the procurement policy for the skate park pavement to be installed ASAP went to a recorded vote :

In support : Councillors McArthur, Renaud, Simone, Mayor DiCarlo

Opposed : Councillors Courtney and Prue and Deputy Mayor Meloche

(For those of you that know me or have followed my blog for a long time, you know that generally I am a “rule follower”…..however, I have to side with Councillors McArthur, Renaud and Simone as well as the Mayor for this one….this pandemic has been very difficult for everyone….but I feel very strongly that those who have suffered the most are our most vulnerable…..the children and the elderly…..the kids need some good, safe fun. And getting the skate park up and running ASAP was the right thing to do in my opinion. The kids have suffered and gone without long enough. They need amenities. I think the four that voted to waive the procurement policy in this one instance to get the skate park up and running quickly did the right thing for our town and for the kids. That being said, I hope they don’t need to waive the procurement policy again in the future and am hopeful that there will not be any extenuating circumstances like this again.)

It was now 9:55 PM……a motion was made to extend the meeting to 11:00 PM. 

Another motion was made to install the pavement for the skate park as per Option 2, in the North-West area of the property at 320 Richmond. That carried. 

Council arrived at the Information Reports section of the meeting. I realized I had been sitting, without moving for 4 hours. I also got a data usage warning on my phone……so I switched to Wi-Fi…..then it started to cut in and out…..so I took that as a message from above that I had done my duty and hung on as as long as possible…..so I shut the meeting off, closed my computer and walked away. 

The Marathon meeting was back. Another evening of inefficiency and lack of preparedness was back……I knew it was too good to last. 

So, what happened after 10:00, I don’t know, and well, I don’t care! Just like I don’t care about what happened in Toronto 20 years ago! LOL! 

Have a great week Amherstburg! Hope to see you out enjoying our Open Air Weekends!

In preparation for Monday June 14th Regular town council meeting

Well, I usually write up my pre-meeting blogs on Friday night or Saturday…..but this weekend is different…..because this weekend is the FIRST Open Air weekend of 2021! And I don’t want to miss out on it because I’m home reading council agendas and typing up short previews. So, I’m getting this done tonight! (Thursday). It’s possible there could be some updates done to the agenda sometime tomorrow, but I’ll figure it out as I go Monday night! I don’t want to miss out on some fun (but safe fun) this weekend! 

Council will meet first at 4:00 for a special meeting. There is only one item on the agenda. 

PRESENTATION

Community Safety and Well-Being Plan, Engagement & Project Update – Leonardo Gil, Project Manager, City of Windsor

This looks to be a pretty interesting presentation, chock full of data. For those who are interested, here’s the link :

https://calendar.amherstburg.ca/council/Detail/2021-06-14-1600-Special-Council-Meeting-Electronic-Meeting-with-Pu2/5828147d-2512-454f-9edb-ad43010ddd6c

It’s only twenty pages, so not too bad if you’re the type of person (like me) that loves reading about studies and data. 

Then, council will meet at 5:00 for a planning meeting. I don’t attend those, virtually or in person. 

Then, council meets for their regular meeting at 6:00. The regular agenda is a slim 241 pages, so not too bad at all. Here are the highlights : 

DELEGATIONS

Solar Power Grant Funding, Green Inclusive Community Building Program – Daren Crawford, Otter Energy 

I’ll have to listen closely to this on Monday night. It seems that there is grant money available for solar power. It appears that this company is looking to apply for grant money to then install solar panels in various buildings. Here’s a sentence from their presentation : “Since 2009 we have been helping Ontario businesses, institutions and community facilities save on energy costs and secure funding to do it.” It’s not clear to me where they’re looking to install the solar panels, but I think it may be on the arena. I’ll listen and see on Monday night. 

Rainbow Crosswalk Proposal – Linden Crain, Amherstburg Resident

Mr Crain will be delegating to council and seeking support for a rainbow crosswalk. The area he is proposing is at the intersection of Richmond Street and Dalhousie Street. His delegation form includes a presentation that shows other communities that have also installed a rainbow crosswalk to show that the community is inclusive. 

Indigenous Peoples Flag Proposal – Linden Crain, Amherstburg Resident

After Mr Crain is finished delegating about the Rainbow Crosswalk, he will then delegate about an indigenous peoples flag proposal. This is another very interesting proposal. It seems that Mr Crain is looking to have two flags installed in the Kings Navy Yard Park to honour the Three Fires Confederacy (Ojibwe, Odawa and Potawatomi peoples as well as the Huron-Wendat and the Wyandot peoples. He is proposing two possible locations. One location would be where several flags are already flown near the fountain in the Kings Navy Yard Park. The second location is near the Commissariat where two flag poles exist but are currently empty. 

PRESENTATIONS

2021 Initiatives and 2021-2022 Official Visitor Guide – Gordon Orr, CEO, Lynnette Bain, Vice President, and Jason Toner, Director of Marketing and Communications, Tourism Windsor Essex Pelee Island (TWEPI)

TWEPI makes an annual presentation to council. I generally enjoy their presentations as they are filled with data and information about tourism in our area. The presentation posted is mostly just pictures with titles. I will be listening closely Monday night as they present their data and how they will help to move our community past the pandemic and into economic recovery. 

Paving for Fire Stations 2 and 3

It looks like council will have to make a decision. Here are the recommendations :

1. An over-expenditure not to exceed $87,000 including net HST for an additional 2021 Capital Project in the Facilities budget centre to provide asphalt repaving at Fire Station 2, as shown in the attachment to the report from the Director, Community & Protective Services dated June 1, 2021, BE APPROVED and BE FUNDED by a transfer from Reserve Fund – General; 

2. An over-expenditure in the Facilities budget centre Fire Station 3 BE APPROVED for either:

a. Option one: A 2021 Capital Project to replace asphalt and concrete pavement at a cost not to exceed $123,000 including net HST, to be funded by a transfer from Reserve Fund – General; OR,

b. Option two: Facility Maintenance expense for concrete and asphalt pavement repairs in selective areas at a cost not to exceed $20,500 including net HST, to be funded from current taxation.

It seems that since Fire Station 3 is not identified in the Fire Master Plan as remaining, funding was not approved during budget deliberations. Instead, council made a motion for administration to bring back a report for how long Fire Station 3 will remain in service. This is from the report : 

“Although repaving at Fire Station 3 was not approved in the 2021 Budget, the paving is in very poor condition and repairs are needed to mitigate safety concerns while the facility is still in use. In response to Council’s question on how long Fire Station 3 will remain in service, unfortunately that duration is indeterminate at this time as the timeline for implementation of the Fire Master Plan is still being developed within resource constraints. The 2021 Five Year Capital Outlook anticipates that some works for fire station consolidation could start as soon as 2025, which would mean Station 3 would continue in operation for at least another five years. However, that outlook and timing could change based on asset development and renewal priorities of Council. 

Administration recommends two options for addressing paving needs at Fire Station 3 to address safety issues related to use of the facility and to maintain safe operations while the facility remains in use. The first option is an additional 2021 capital project to replace both the concrete and asphalt pavement areas, however, as Council may be hesitant to invest in those works given the uncertainty around how long the facility will remain in operation, a second option would be approval of operating funds to complete only selective pavement repairs at Fire Station 3 in order to help mitigate safety concerns. The primary focus for selective paving would be directly in front of the fire bay doors.”

We’ll have to wait and see what council decides to do on Monday night. 

Amherstburg Destination River Cruises

This item has been discussed before during council meetings. There are River cruises that come from Windsor to Amherstburg through the summer months. It looks like administration is looking for permission to negotiate a contract for the ships to stop in Amherstburg to allow people to disembark for a few hours and spend time in our beautiful town. The dates are still somewhat tentative due to COVID regulations and depending on the re-opening phases allowed by the province. 

Conceptual Stormwater Management Plan for Canard Valley Estates Phase 2 Development

I believe this item was discussed (at length) at the last meeting. It seems that the developers now have a plan of subdivision in hand and are looking for council’s approval for the stormwater management plan. Here is the recommendation : 

1. The proposed conceptual plan to locate a Stormwater Management Pond on lands identified as Part 80 on Plan 12M527 (2.45 acres) (currently Canard Estates Park) BE SUPPORTED as part of the developer’s draft plan of subdivision application for Canard Valley Estates Subdivision Phase 2 servicing, subject to recommendation two; and,

2. The conveyance of Part 80 on Plan 12M527 (2.45 acres) to Valente Group in exchange for cash in lieu of parkland dedication at the current market value appraisal BE APPROVED and the funds be deposited into the Parkland Dedication Reserve Fund.

Placement of Underground Infrastructure, Curbs and Base Asphalt on Maintenance – Kingsbridge Subdivision Phase 7C 

This looks to be a simple housekeeping item regarding curbs and base asphalt for the Kingsbridge subdivision development. 

Culvert Replacements Conc. 5 South over Albert McGee Drain (Culvert 8) and Conc. 3 North over Whelan Drain (Culvert 38) – Tender Results

It looks like the tenders went out for the above noted work and the prices are now in. Here’s the recommendation :

1. An over-expenditure not to exceed $26,600 for replacement of Culvert 8 at a total project cost not to exceed $341,600 including net HST BE APPROVED and be funded by Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund – Formula Based funding as a transfer from Reserve Fund – Ontario Grants;

2. The Tender for 2021 Culvert Replacements at Conc. 5 South over Albert McGee Drain (Culvert 8) and Conc. 3 North over Whelan Drain (Culvert 38) BE AWARDED to South Shore Contracting of Essex County Inc. for an amount not to exceed $634,260.00 plus HST; and,

3. The Mayor and Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement with South Shore Contracting of Essex County Inc. for the 2021 Culvert Replacements Conc. 5 South over Albert McGee Drain & Conc. 3 North over Whelan Drain.

Request for a Building Inspector/Plans Examiner Staff Position

It seems that there is a lot of work to be done in the building department and there’s not enough staff to get it all done. Administration is looking for council’s approval to hire a full time building inspector/plans examiner. Here is a chart, from the report, comparing Amherstburg’s staffing levels to other surrounding municipalities.

I took the following from the report….it’s a list of current and near future development for Amherstburg. 

“The following is a list of the top eight projects that are ongoing and other projects anticipated to begin within the next 3 years: 

  •  General Amherst High School (Permit issued in 4th quarter 2020) 
  • Greenhouse project – 3 rd Concession N. (Permit issued)
  • Phase 10 – Kingsbridge Subdivision (Construction work underway)
  • Hunt Club Creek Subdivision & South East Quadrant (1,400 homes)
  • Long Term Care Facility at 320 Richmond
  • Phase 2 – Canard Estates Subdivision 
  • Proposed Development of Woodland Trails
  • South End Boblo Development
  • Proposed Hotel in Downtown Area 
  • Proposed New Greenhouse Project
  • Proposed 120 Unit Residential Apartment Building
  • Proposed Assisted Living Facility 
  • Redevelopment of the House Youth Centre & Proposed Condo Development
  • Proposed Condo Development at Fort & Sandwich
  • Proposed Waterfront Condo Development
  • Proposed Luxury Apartment on Sandwich”

Looks like we have a lot of great things coming our way! It looks like with the increased building activity there is a need for a building inspector to ensure that legislative requirements are met. It seems that this recommended position would be a unionized position with the town. 

Roadmap to Recovery – Next Steps

It looks like administration needs direction to re-open municipal facilities in accordance with Step 3 of the Province’s plan for re-opening Ontario. Here’s what will open in step 3 : 

  • Outdoor gatherings with larger capacity limits; 
  • Indoor gatherings with larger capacity limits and other restrictions;
  • Indoor dining with capacity limits; 
  • Indoor sports and recreational fitness facilities with capacity limits (this will allow Libro Centre to open once again); 
  • Indoor meeting and event spaces with capacity limits (this will allow Council and Committees to resume in-person meetings with capacity limits);
  • Essential and non-essential retail capacity expanded;
  • Personal care services with capacity expanded and other restrictions;
  • Indoor cinemas and performing arts facilities with capacity limits; 
  • Indoor and outdoor religious services, rites or ceremony gatherings with capacity limited to permit 2 metres physical distancing; 
  • Indoor museums and art galleries with capacity limits; 
  • Indoor zoos, aquariums, waterparks and amusement parks with capacity limits; 
  • Casinos and bingo halls with capacity limits; and
  • Other outdoor activities from Step Two permitted to operate indoors.

I italicized the items that would affect the municipality directly. It looks like we need to be prepared in advance so that when Step 3 happens, we’re ready! 

And after these items, there will be some consent correspondence, information reports and new business items…..we’ll have to wait and see what surprises Monday night holds. And finally, at the end of the evening, council will go behind closed doors to discuss : 

SPECIAL IN-CAMERA COUNCIL MEETING

 That Council move into an In-Camera Meeting of Council at directly following Regular session pursuant to Section 239 of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended for the following reason:

Item A – Section 239(2)(c) – A proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the municipality or local board.

And that’s it folks! I’ll be back sometime next week with the summary of Monday night’s goings on…..and in the meantime, I hope to see you all at Open Air Weekends this weekend! I’ve been looking forward to this for a really long time! LOL