I’m back even though there’s no council meeting this week. I couldn’t help but notice the uproar this week on social media and elsewhere about the town’s recent donation to ERCA. OK, I even participated in the uproar a bit. Because, quite frankly, this fiasco is uproar worthy. Let me start from the beginning….
Last Saturday I was doing my usual pre-meeting blog research. I was skimming through the various parts of the council meeting agenda and I noticed that the town was reporting that they came in around $750,000 UNDER budget for 2016!! What great news one would think….of course, if one is from Amherstburg, news can go from great to “what the heck” really, really fast. Town administration was presenting 4 options to town council of what they could do with our surplus money. I’ll be honest, I almost missed it. The report was really lengthy and as I said, I skim through them. I can’t help but wonder what would have happened if I had missed it? Two of the options included a $100,000 donation to ERCF (ERCA’s fund raising arm) for the newly built trails between Amherstburg and Essex. The other two options did not include this donation. And in the report, administration told council these were some ideas but they were free to do otherwise as well.
Anyway, I blogged about it on Saturday and the issue continued to bug me. Was town council actually considering such a large donation with our overpaid tax money? Maybe they were considering one of the other 2 options that did not include a donation? It seemed we had only recently turned our financial situation around…weren’t we a total basket case financially just a few years ago?…did I miss something? Were we already so rich we could just throw some money to ERCA, a government-funded organisation? Should I put in a delegation request and ask for my portion back? Cash or cheque I’m open to either…LOL. While I feel the CWATS trails and Greenways are excellent initiatives, I feel ERCA receives sufficient support through their general levies and other levels of government grants. These excess funds belonged to the residents of Amherstburg and I felt should be kept or spent specifically on needs not wants.
As a taxpayer and resident of Amherstburg, I do not feel it is fiscally responsible to donate any of our budget surpluses to any organisation. ERCA is a government subsidised organisation already and receives tax payer money from several levels of government. This money was paid to the town by the taxpayers for a very specific service, i.e. what was contained in the budget document. Thus, I feel the only responsible use of this excess money would be to put it towards reserves or debt only. I do not think excess tax money that had been collected should be donated to anybody. It should remain in reserves for future needs and/or used to pay some debt.
So, on Sunday morning, I sent an email to all of council. In my email, I expressed to council that I felt that any surplus money should be spent only on debt and/or put into reserves. This money is OUR tax money that was over collected during the 2016 year. I did not feel any of our overpaid tax money should be donated to anyone or anything. I received a prompt reply from Councillor Fryer who briefly explained to me the “difference” between ERCA (Essex Region Conservation Authority) and ERCF (Essex Region Conservation Foundation). He also said neither organisation had requested the money. (Oh, OK, I see….so we’re just going to offer them some? Really? Why?) I replied again and re-explained my position and then that was it.
On Monday evening when I arrived for the meeting, there was a supplementary agenda with a delegation on it for Donation to the Essex Region Conservation Foundation for the Cypher Systems Greenway – Susan Stockwell Andrews, President; Claire Wales, Vice-President; Sean Collier, Director; and Richard Wyma, Executive Director, Essex Region Conservation Foundation. My heart sank. The minute I saw that delegation I knew this donation was going to happen. I would have bet money on it. (How about $100,000? LOL) I felt it was not the right thing to do for the taxpayers, I had done my part, sent my email, but now it was all up to fate. Or, up to the members of council….is that fate? I’m not sure….are preconceived ideas and votes fate? Are previously discussed alliances fate? While I waited for the meeting to begin, Councillor Fryer kept going to talk to the delegations from ERCA. Councillor Fryer is the recently appointed chair of ERCA, so I guess they all know each other. Probably very well.
So, I took my seat and the show began. Council went out of order and allowed the delegation for ERCA to speak first. Honestly, I could see what was about to happen. I could tell from the tone of the delegation and the tone of the council chambers, that they were about to hand over $100,000 to ERCA as a donation. After the presentation Councillor Meloche had a question about the parking near the new trail head. But that was it.
After that, I watched in disbelief as Councillor Fryer made the motion to donate $100,000 to ERCA for the trails. I literally sat there with my jaw dropped as I watched Councillor Courtney, Councillor Meloche, Councillor Lavigne and Deputy Mayor DiPasquale support this motion. Each of their hands went up in support. As the residents in the gallery sat there like we had just been punched in the gut, Councillor Fryer was all smiles. He invited us all to the grand opening to happen in a few days. He said he would be bringing a group of cyclists with him. Of course, once the meeting continued, the ERCA people immediately left. (I, however, was only in the very beginning part of a long and painful meeting.) I just want to explain a bit of procedure that I have learned through goodness knows how many hours of sitting in council meetings. The Mayor only votes for recorded votes or to break a tie. He can vote if he feels it necessary (which I’ve seen happen once and it created a 3-3 vote, which made it a wash). Since the Mayor is the chair, he is supposed to keep a sense of order to the meeting and remain, if possible, relatively impartial. (How he does it is beyond me…..I have a hard time biting my tongue and not screaming sometimes….) So, the Mayor neither supported nor opposed the motion to give away the money. If he had opposed it, it would not have made a difference. It would have simply been 5-1. However, I am curious if he feels this was a good move. I’m also curious how Councillor Pouget feels about this. She was absent from the meeting. Would she have supported or opposed this tax money give-away? Tough call, since it was going to an environmental organisation…..
Later in the meeting, I sat through a discussion about how the Libro Centre is underfunded. Council plans to raise the rates and put that burden on the taxpayers. Two years ago this council cut $100,000 from the Libro Centre’s budget. Now, they gladly handed away $100,000 to ERCA……what a sad state of affairs. I swear I couldn’t make this stuff up if I tried. Does council see the hypocrisy here or is it just me?
So Tuesday rolled around. I received a reply to my Sunday email from Councillor Courtney. (Better late than never, right? Well, the vote was said and done, so I can’t see how it matters…..) She seemed to feel she needed to support the trails because the town of Essex had donated $100,000 to the trails. I never replied to her email, since at this point, there was no point. The vote was over…..however, it does leave me to wonder…..did the town of Essex include their donation in their budget? Also, if the town of Essex makes a bad financial decision, are we, the town of Amherstburg obligated to follow suit? I don’t know…..
Through the rest of the week, I have watched with interest the commentary on social media. I can see that the residents are angry about this turn of events.
Personally, I am tired of how these items are always sprung at the last minute. I’m sure not many people in Amherstburg read the agendas. I’m not even sure that the councillors do and they’re paid to read it and be prepared. I stumbled on this by accident and had barely a day to react. How does this allow for public input? I thought our current members of council promised transparency and accountability when they were seeking election? How is putting a $100,000 donation in an agenda transparent? As for accountability……how is council accountable for this? They took our money and gave it away. All we can do now is complain, stomp our feet, yell and cry. How can we hold them accountable for giving away a chunk of our overpaid tax money? From the pictures with the smiling faces of Councillors Fryer, Councillor Meloche and Deputy Mayor DiPasquale, I have to assume they think this is wonderful, even though we don’t. I have yet to see anybody on social media say that they think this was a good move.
If there’s even a peep of a tax increase next year, my head may spin. We overpaid more than $700,000 last year and council gave away a good chunk of it and at the same time and IN THE SAME MEETING sat and cried poor over the arena budget! If there’s a surplus next year, we should all make a delegation request (last minute of course) and ask for a cheque to return us our money. What do you think?
Just for a visual…..here’s a picture of our money leaving our coffers.