Well, on a scale of one to ten, I would give tonight’s meeting a 9.5. It was a real show stopper. First, there were approximately 50 people in attendance. There was yelling from the gallery at one point, with the gavel being pounded, there were several recorded votes, motions made, motions withdrawn, motions amended, motions being batted around like a cat with a toy. There was even an impromptu in-camera meeting thrown in during the middle of the regular meeting. Good times. Here we go.
DELEGATIONS 5.1 Request to Waive Event Fees for Amherstburg Rotary Rib Fest – Carl Gibb
Mr. Gibb was unable to attend, therefore three people from the Rotary Club spoke on his behalf. I didn’t catch all of the names, sorry. They asked that council waive the fees for the Rib Fest event. They kindly pointed out the Rotary Club is a not-for-profit organization that donates money back into the town of Amherstburg. Councillor Pouget asked a few questions about what costs are incurred by the town (if any) or if there are any in-kind services provided. There was some back and forth about the deposit fee and if it was included in the amount they were asking to have waived (just over $1300.00). The CAO had to remind council a few times that the fees are per council’s scheduled fees and that organizations can only ask for relief from council. Anyway, when it was said and done, fees were waived. (Just a personal observation, but man, why have fees if they just get waived all the time? Either that, or change the criteria for fees I guess. )
Belle Vue Property at 525 Dalhousie Street – Robert Honor, Belle Vue Cultural Foundation
Mr. Honor made a presentation to council. He outlined the history of Belle Vue and why it is a historically significant building and property. The presentation was very interesting and included pictures in a powerpoint presentation. At the end, he asked for council’s support to secure the property.
At this point, the Mayor said that council would need to go in-camera to discuss item A, already scheduled for later this evening. “ITEM A – Potential Property Acquisition – Section 239(2)(c) – A proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the municipality or local board.” So, just like that, they called an in-camera meeting around 6:35 or so. We all had to go and wait outside in the lobby. (At least we didn’t get kicked out to wait outside in the parking lot…LOL) The in-camera meeting lasted darn near an hour. Most people from the gallery stuck around.
When we went back into chambers, Deputy Mayor DiPasquale was chairing the meeting. (hmmmm…..something’s up). The Mayor spoke of Belle Vue’s deep historical roots and that now is the time, with a new government and grants available, to act. He also said that the town’s official plan recommends acquiring waterfront property when available. Mayor DiCarlo was acting as a voting member of council and presented a motion. ( I did the best I could to get the motion written down properly, but if I made a mistake, I apologize and don’t sue me.) The motion was : That the CAO be authorized to negotiate the acquisition of the properties for municipal purpose upon completion of a business plan and negotiations. Councillor Fryer seconded the motion. There were a few small questions and then it went to a recorded vote. (I love those. ) Well, it passed unanimously! (On a side note, I can’t help but notice the motion did not specify which properties…..and I’ve been going to enough meetings now to know that sometimes it’s the things that aren’t said that are more important than the things that are…..hmmmm……) After this vote, there was clapping and then approximately half of the gallery left. So there you have it folks, the Town is looking to buy the Belle Vue…and maybe more…property.
Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment regarding Boarding Kennels By-law
- Americo Fernandes
- Ernest Bezaire
- Tom Diemer
OK, this was heated, very heated. Just to bring you up to speed, a resident wants to build a kennel out on the Fourth Concession. Mr. Fernandes, who wants to build the kennel, asked if the opponents to the kennel could speak first. They did. Mr Louis Jahn spoke on behalf of Mr Bezaire. He read a letter from a lawyer criticizing the setback and the by-law amendment. The current by-law has a stipulation of a 2000 ft setback from a neighbour’s home for kennels, the Fernandes’ are asking for a 100 ft setback. The opponents want a 1000 ft setback. Mr. Fernandes then spoke. A neighbour that was in the gallery started yelling at him and getting angry. The Mayor had to pound the gavel, more than once. Mr. Fernandes had a video of a drone flying above the properties and explained which properties belonged to which people and where they were looking to put the dog kennel. There was some back and forth between Councillor Lavigne and Rebecca (town admin) about if procedure was followed. Rebecca stated that there are 2 processes colliding and they need to be pulled apart. Deputy Mayor DiPasquale put forth a motion that the house-keeping by-law be deferred for 2 months to allow public input and that the Fernandes’ apply for a zoning by-law amendment. Basically, the house-keeping by-law is one issue and the Fernandes’ kennel is another issue. A recorded vote was called (drum roll please)
Support: Councillor Courtney, Deputy Mayor DiPasquale, Councillors Meloche and Pouget
Opposed: Councillors Fryer and Lavigne, Mayor DiCarlo
(I don’t think I have ever seen that voting combination before…..just sayin’)
Now, the vote was over, but nothing was over. There was more back and forth. Councillor Fryer had questions, so did Councillor Pouget. The Mayor kept trying to move on. They kept trying to move back. Finally, because of procedure, the Mayor was able to move on with the agenda.
Most of the rest of the gallery emptied out. There were 8 of us left. It appeared the dog kennel issue had almost as many people there as did the Belle Vue issue.
Another delegation
Councillor Pouget was questioning why a delegation had been refused. After much lengthy debate, the delegation (Miss Boussey) was allowed to speak. Actually, Mr John McLaughlin spoke on her behalf. I did not have any background on this situation. From what I could gather Miss Boussey is experiencing difficulties with a turkey farm next door to her home. Seems there are noise by-law infractions, dust problems, etc. It also seems there is an ongoing investigation about all of this. Councillor Pouget mentioned wanting a report to council next meeting but Councillor Meloche pointed out there’s already an on-going investigation and they may not have resolve for some time. He said it’s unfortunate, but must follow due diligence. So, that was it. Done.
Health and Safety Concerns- Cash Handling
Basically, town employees have been going to the bank with large cash deposits on a regular basis. Certain safety steps were implemented (ex. buddy system), however, it is still a risky practice leaving employees at risk of robbery and/or violence. Administration is offering two solutions. The first is to go to a cashless system. There is a time-line in place for the changeover to ensure the public would be aware. Advertising and workshops will be offered to help residents find options other than cash to pay their taxes. The second option is an armoured car service, at a cost of $14 000/year.
OK, things got a little crazy here, so hang on and try to follow along.
Councillor Meloche said he doesn’t like restricting the residents in how to pay and doesn’t want to make it difficult. He makes a motion to receive and authorize the armoured car service at a cost of $14,000. Councillor Courtney seconds the motion. Councillor Pouget wants to know why employees don’t want to handle cash and that if other municipalities do it, why not us? Mr Rousseau explains that it’s a health and safety issue that has arisen and must be dealt with. Councillor Pouget wants to know if handling cash is in the job description. Mr Rousseau says yes, but if it’s safe to do so, is 2 different questions. CAO Miceli discussed the importance of dealing with this and that the employees don’t feel safe walking money to the bank. He also points out that the $14000 cost is small in a $35 million budget. Councillor Pouget raised her hand again and the Mayor said one more to her (as in one more question). She replied she’ll ask as many as she needs. This opened the flood gates to more back and forth, forth and back about cash, no cash, armoured car, no armoured car, safety, danger…..Councillor Courtney then withdraws her second to the motion.
Councillor Pouget then makes a motion to receive the report and administration to come back with another option to solve the problem. There was no seconder.
Councillor Fryer then makes a motion to receive the report and not accept cash any more, but asks what the time lines would be. The CAO points out that the time lines are on page 3 of the report and goes over the time lines. (Funny, I knew the time lines and I had simply glanced through the agenda on a Saturday night.) However, again, no seconder.
Then Councillor Fryer makes a motion to simply receive the report and Councillor Pouget seconds.
The Mayor asks what do we do in the short term? The CAO repeats that they are at a crossroad and must take action. Councillor Fryer wants to deal with it in the 2017 budget. The CAO says in the meantime, there would be no answer on how to deposit cash. Mayor DiCarlo talks about how if an employee has said they’re uncomfortable bringing a large sum of cash to the bank, council will become responsible, due to inaction. Councillor Pouget returns to questioning how other municipalities handle this. Councillor Meloche wants to bring back his motion for the armoured car, but he can’t because there’s another motion on the floor.
Then, it happened. Thankfully. Councillor Lavigne spoke up. (I was starting to get worried, that the game of ring around the rosy may never end but Councillor Lavigne brought it to a close with logic and reason.) He asked council if they really wanted the Ministry of Labour coming back in and forcing council to deal with this. He said council may not like it (that the employees don’t want to bring cash to the bank), but that council has to deal with it. Councillor Fryer’s motion to simply receive the report goes to a vote, but it is defeated by Councillors Meloche, Lavigne, Deputy Mayor DiPasquale and Mayor DiCarlo.
Lo and behold we go right back to square one and Councillor Meloche makes the motion for the armoured car service. It goes to a vote….everybody votes for it, except Councillor Pouget.
This part of the meeting was like a crazy roller coaster ride at Cedar Point. I’m still trying to figure out how Councillors Courtney and Fryer changed their minds back to voting for the armoured car service, but I digress….I don’t think I can figure this one out.
At this point, it was shortly after 9PM and quite frankly, I had had enough. I left. The meeting was still going. It may still be going now, I don’t know. During the crazy cash debate, members of the public started to drop like flies. There were 8 at the beginning. When I left, there were only two. I wonder if they survived to the end?
As for councillor of the week…..I have a 2-way tie. I nominate Mayor DiCarlo for the initiative about the waterfront properties (Belle Vue?), although I’m not sure, quite yet, if I 100% agree with it, I am anxious to see the plan once it plays out. I also nominate Councillor Lavigne for saving me from the endless discussion about the cash or no cash issue. I think there’s something to be said for people that can just make a decision when one needs to be made and move on.
I would like to make a motion: popcorn for meetings that last more than 2 hours and seat cushions, that would be nice…..seat cushions…..
Oh, and my pen ran out of ink halfway through the meeting. Luckily I had a spare.