Candidates responses to questions regarding debt control / investments and Amherstburg’s sign by-law

Hello once again to all my blog followers and readers,

Well, we’re back with the fourth series of questions for our candidates. I must thank you all once again for the positive feedback and enthusiasm! Keep the ideas for questions coming! 

Tonight we’re getting right down to business. Here we go!

Here are the two questions that were asked this week to the list of candidates and their answers (in alphabetical order by position)  :

Question number 1 :  

How will you balance debt control and investing in the town’s future?

Aldo DiCarlo (Candidate for Mayor)

I will continue to work with council on the path that we have used over the last 3 1/2 years.  During this term, we have paid down our long term debt, created capital levies to address current and future needs, purchased waterfront properties with cash following the Community Strategic Plan and switched to paying for capital improvements almost entirely with cash.  This was a great departure from the past councils’ practices of relying on grant funding and long term debt. A big misconception that seems to linger is that we can pay down our outstanding long term debt any faster than we already are. The debt is NOT like a home mortgage that we can just reopen or renegotiate, the debt is truly locked in and we will have to pay it down as per the terms agreed to by past councils.  What we can do, what we have done, is NOT ADD to the long term debt. This was not easy considering we started with no reserves, but has made a significant improvement in the town’s financial situation, as confirmed by the town’s financial audits and reports. In order to market the town as a great place to live, visit and invest in, we need to maintain a balance of addressing our needs and building for our future. As much as everyone wants good roads, good roads on it’s own won’t attract new people.  Parks, festivals and other amenities help bring people in and need attention too. I believe we need to continue building our reserves, continuing to repair/replace capital infrastructure as quickly and financially responsible as possible, and continue to invest in bringing more people to Amherstburg.

Glenn Swinton (Candidate for Mayor)

No response provided. 

Richard (Rick) Fryer (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

Debt control and investments into our future go hand in hand. We must continue to lower our overall debt and NOT thru taxation increases to our residence. We MUST actively start engaging business to come to Amherstburg and that is why I voted against the deferral of Wendy’s. We MUST after this election make it more streamlined for businesses and corporations to come to Amherstburg and provide our residence with jobs. We MUST make decisions on certain investiments strategically that will not  rely on residential taxes. I will advocate for more funding to better our infrastructure at the County level as you Deputy Mayor. We haven’t seen our infrastructure like County Road 20 being maintained to a higher level as has been in the past. With the County having millions in reserves. communities that pay into the system of 2 Tier ahould be able to enjoy proper roads, drainage and walkable pathways. I, if given the privilege to represent you the  residence as Deputy Mayor will be pushing that every road project done in Amherstburg with have walking pathways on both sides of the road to ensure our families can enjoy biking walking and running safely.

Leo Meloche (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

4 years ago debt was a major concern. Today although our debt is still somewhat elevated in comparison with other municipalities, it is under control due to better management. The introduction of levies necessitated by years of mismanagement has addressed the need for capital dollars to support infrastructure and growth. The concept of “pay as you go” as opposed to debt financing of capital projects has impacted positively on debt levels over the past 4 years.

Continuing to build reserves coupled with the ‘pay as you go” concept will put us in a better position to invest in our future.

Diane Pouget (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

No response provided. 

Bob Rozankovic (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

This is never an easy exercise as we don’t have a crystal ball to foretell the economic future. Having said that, and knowing that Amherstburg is still carrying a considerable amount of long term debt (Approximately $36M), I would be hesitant in adding any debt at this point in time without a business case proving a viable rate of return on a project.

Recent investments in the town’s future must now be managed in such a way that they do not create long term debt.

Sometimes the best investments in a town’s future are the ones where we take care of our current residents’ needs…roads, parks, sidewalks, senior programs, and programs for our youth.

Frank Cleminson (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided. 

Peter Courtney (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided. 

Pauline Gemmell (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided. 

Libby (Elizabeth) Keenan (Candidate for Councillor)

I would balance investment in the town by using available funds for much needed infrastructure and improvements to roads, water treatment systems, drainage and flood control improvements. I would control debt by strongly urging the Town of  Amherstburg to stop all additional purchases of (real Property) until the town can afford to develop the ones they already have. I would strongly suggest aggressive marketing to lessors of underutilized space at the Libro Centre and I would stop paying large amounts of tax payers dollars on studies we are in no financial position to act on.

Jason Lavigne (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided. 

Lena Lazanja (Candidate for Councillor)

Every municipality faces fiscal challenges when proposing, implementing, and maintaining, changes to infrastructure and policy.Everything from staff hiring and road repair tenders, to waterfront development and commercial investment, present various factors that influence Amherstburg’s fiscal flexibility, debt control, and sustainability…all while considering our dynamic tax base, environmental assessments, policy guidelines, and maintaining the historic integrity of our town.

This question goes beyond simple number crunching and balancing budgets. We need a council in place that is unbiased, forward-thinking, and willing to not only promote Amherstburg “as is” to residents and tourists, but to endorse and stimulate positive economic growth through business incentives and policy re-evaluation. We must envision a future population increase in conjunction with sustainable commercial development and employment expansion, along with all of the changes that this will entail. A council that thinks outside the box and is open to change, while understanding that you cannot sustain a town on residential tax increases alone.

Simply put, Amherstburg cannot sustain itself by spending without income generation, without future plans for industry growth and large commercial investment. Without large-scale investment, there is no solid tax base growth. Without such business development, there are no jobs. Without jobs, there is no reason for young families to stay, which threatens the sustainability of our town as a whole. To continue to promote a “sleepy hollow” image of our town would be to its detriment.

We need to encourage responsible large business development decisions, while revisiting current plans and projects, through a cost-effective lens, in order to ensure financial stability, and providing a source of revenue to off-set the simultaneous growth of service and infrastructure demands.

Seasonal festivals, restaurant franchises, and park expansions alone, will not support the financial demands of our town in the long-term. We cannot continue to purchase properties with the hope that they will generate revenue through seasonal tourism. Without a hotel, or comparable large-scale accommodation options, industrial investment opportunities, and more incentives for promoting tourism and local business during the winter months, we are left with an annual fiscal “lull” and stagnant seasonal outreach.

We need to re-evaluate our direction, spending wisely for long-term gain. We need a self-promotion plan in place that makes Amherstburg a top destination, not only for seasonal tourists, but for long-term investors, nation-wide. A few of the main future challenges I have listed are directly relatable to the on-going projects and Council directives that are currently underway, such as: the proposed Festival Plaza & Marina (at the old Duffy’s site), the Belle Vue House restoration & conference center project, the Amherstburg-to-Windsor Policing transfer, proposed plans for a new hotel, a new senior’s center (at St. Bernard’s school), and much-needed road repair and responsible sewer/waste-water management.

It is my opinion that, although we are sitting in a better fiscal position than we were years ago, and our residential developments are flourishing, there has not been enough forethought and planning for commercial growth, lucrative investment, and residential tax savings. The forecasted savings from a policing transfer will do absolutely nothing if we continue to make poor financial commitments. Master park plans and branding improvements will not be sufficient should there be nothing left in the town coffers to repair roadways and improve necessary services in an expanding town. If we do not reach out and recruit potential investors, fostering opportunities for significant revenue-generating commercial business opportunities, we will no longer be able to financially sustain our growing population needs. We have committees struck for other areas, and we had an Economic Development Committee that was disbanded before it was able to fully address these issues; so why not an Investment Promotion and Commercial Recruitment team/committee? I would be happy to hear feedback and future planning ideas from residents and business owners along this front. Contact me to discusslazanja4aburg@gmail.com  www.bethechangetogether.ca   

Donald McArthur (Candidate for Councillor)

The negative headlines surrounding Amherstburg’s financial crisis from several years ago have been transformed into mostly positive ones, focused on growth, tourism, waterfront development and the reduction of debt twinned with boosted reserves.

The incoming council must maintain this momentum by continuing to tackle debt and boosting reserves while thinking long-term and making shrewd spending decisions designed to encourage growth — promoting Amherstburg as a tourist destination, a welcoming community for seniors and retirees, and a place where young families can buy affordable homes and enjoy first-class amenities, like accessible parks, trails, and a revamped waterfront bursting with boats and foot traffic.

The cost to run the Libro Centre and the cost to pave a road is the same whether we’re a town of 22,000 or a town of 50,000. But the larger our population, the less the burden on individual taxpayers. That’s why our spending decisions need to encourage responsible growth — like the Edgewater Diversion project, which paves the way for as many as 700 homes for 700 new families. But we can’t just focus on residential development. We need to attract commercial and industrial development as well.

Amherstburg can look to other municipalities that offer incentives to attract certain types of development. Windsor’s downtown improvement plan, for example, spurred nine developments worth some $60 million. We could craft incentive packages to boost tourism, attract a hotel, increase residential density in key areas, create a thriving arts scene or even a tech hub – creating a critical mass of office jobs for the next generation of worker who cares about quality of life and can commute via a keyboard.

We already have several small and medium manufacturers in town. UK alcohol giant Diageo is reportedly in talks to invest in the Canadian cannabis space. Just imagine the possibilities if it inks a deal with Aphria. We have 795 acres designated heavy and light industrial in the Howard Avenue/Smith Industrial area. The former General Chemical plant has been reclaimed and is serviced and ready for re-development opportunities.

It’s our job now to spread the word and inform potential investors of our strategic advantages, including our proximity to the border, our highly-skilled workforce, our quality rail and marine transportation linkages and the fact that council, if the jobs are there and the investment fits with town priorities, has the power to waive development charges for industrial and commercial developments.

It won’t be easy. Other municipalities, many with full-time economic development officers, are likewise wooing potential investors. The key is marketing ourselves not only as a place to do business but also as a progressive municipality with a rich history and boundless potential, where homes are still affordable and the amenities second to none.

John Menna (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided. 

Gregory Moore (Candidate for Councillor)

My approach to balancing debt will be very simple……we need drastically slow down out of control spending on non necessary items such as pay raises ,redundant projects and find ways to reduce depatmental budgets instead of continusl increases. Each department head needs to be financially rewarded for identifying and implimenting cost savings while reducing their departmental budgets.  I have also put fourth other cost savi gs ideas such as the Libro centre being turned over to a private management company. All of these cost savings will free up money to go toward relatively low cost high value items such as new baseball diamonds….basketball/tennis courts and a new swimming pool. All of these items should have been in place when council decided to dissolve many of these older but useful facilities.

I also highly suggest a pay freeze for council(including the Mayor) and the office of CAO.  

These are and have been a few of my suggestions and there are many ideas yet to come.

Michael Prue (Candidate for Councillor)

The accumulation of debt continues to be a problem for Amherstburg. The sustainability indicators in the recent “Financial Indicators Review” show Amherstburg’s debt servicing cost to be the highest in the region at 11.3%. The median in Essex Region is 5.2%

This may prove to be problematic if interest rates continue to rise.

It is therefore imperative that debt control remain a priority for the incoming Council. At the same time we must continue to invest in our infrastructure, our heritage resources and especially our people.

All of this can only be accomplished when the Town increases its revenue base through commercial and industrial expansion. Simply building more houses will not adequately expand that base as servicing costs use up much of the tax assessment revenue.

Building commercial, industrial and institutional facilities are necessary for the jobs they produce and for the monies that will flow into Amherstburg’s coffers. This will also bring great vibrancy to our community.

I would support a new position of an economic development officer and further measures to streamline the planning process. It would be money well spent.

Marc Renaud (Candidate for Councillor)

It is important for us to have a “pay-as-you-go” mentality and  not burden ourselves with debt and interest payments, since this impacts the services the town can deliver to the community. We must prioritize essential services, such as roads, sewers and water.  Any surpluses should be dedicated to paying off our debt, investing in priority capital spending and keeping tax increases under control.

Patricia Simone (Candidate for Councillor)

The question seems to assume that “debt control” and “investing in the town’s future” are two separate and incompatible goals. In fact, there will be no future for the town if we do not control the debt. Therefore, debt control is, in fact, a means of securing the town’s future. I have seen lots of tax money wasted by politicians who claim to be “investing in the town’s future.” That’s an empty phrase. A smart investor does not get swamped by debt.

Ron Sutherland (Candidate for Councillor)

Chose not to participate. 

Lori Wightman (Candidate for Councillor)

I think debt control is very important and should be a priority but I also think we need to be realistic when it comes to expenditures. We should investigate all possibilities available to pay for things, whether it be using reserves, fundraising , sponsorships, “saving” for it or applying for grants from different levels of government. Adding to the debt should almost always be the last resort but it is a tool available to us. Sometimes the kind of expenditure or the time frame in which it needs to be completed dictates how it should be funded.

The way to think of municipal debt is not as credit card type debt but more like a mortgage debt. It cannot necessarily be paid off sooner like a credit card can. It’s a set amount with set interest amortized over a long period of time like a mortgage. There are Annual Repayment Limits that are set and can’t be changed without approval of the Ontario Municipal Board. Sometimes there are expenditures that need to be done and need to be done in a timely manner so they don’t become worse. Using the home mortgage example, if your roof starts leaking and needs to be replaced and you don’t have the lump sum to do it – adding that cost to the amount of your mortgage could be the smart thing to do.

Long term debt can fund long term improvements like roads or other infrastructure in a way that is cost effective and timely. That’s an investment in the future of our town, just as parks, arenas and other amenities are an investment in our future.

We need to continue to move Amherstburg forward or risk being left behind as other municipalities surpass us in services, amenities and attractions. We need to continue to invest and set ourselves apart from others in this region as THE destination. We need to increase the quality of life for our own residents and we need to use all the tools available to us in a responsible way.

Question number 2 :

What are your thoughts on Amherstburg’s current sign by-law? How would you balance the advertising options for local business versus the need to keep the streets aesthetically pleasing?  

Aldo DiCarlo (Candidate for Mayor)

The sign bylaw has become a contentious issue between business owners and homeowners.  Many homeowners see the signs as clutter while business owners use signs for needed advertising.  If we’ve learned nothing else, it’s that the current sign bylaw seems to be too restrictive. The examples are the many business property owners who have come to council seeking relief.  Since relief has been granted on almost every occasion, there seems to be some room for changes. I don’t believe we should go back to the old bylaw but I do believe we need to hear from the business owners on what they believe would be a reasonable compromise.  Administration has been directed by council to build electronic signs at the entrances to the business ends of the town, which may or may not alleviate some of the business owners’ concerns. There may also be an opportunity to come up with a sign design that matches the town’s heritage that could be enforced if more signs were allowed.  Once the town’s urban design guidelines plan is finalized, I think it would be a good time to revisit this bylaw, to see if changes could be made to better fit all parties’ needs and wants.

Glenn Swinton (Candidate for Mayor)

No response provided.

Richard (Rick) Fryer (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

The sign by-law has been some what controversial over many many years and quite frankly it should be. Signs are a necessary evil for our local businesses and as a councillor I have supported many signs that help promote local business. We have to remember that businesses pay taxes and this helps the burden of taxing each and every household in Amherstburg. For this exact reason is why I want to represent our community to promote that Amherstburg is Open for Business.

Leo Meloche (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

As a supporter of local business and event organizers, I recognize the need to use a variety of marketing tools to promote business activity and events. Yes there has to be controls in place.

A program that addresses the need for signage (ie. lawns, parking lots and front of businesses) may be one that allows a business or organization up to 60 days in a calendar year to promote a sale, grand opening or event. The 60 days can be used in a block or in two 30 day increments as determined by the business/organizer. We need to encourage and support our local economy.

Diane Pouget (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

No response provided.

Bob Rozankovic (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

The current by-law requires some attention as the need to support businesses is somewhat in conflict with the need to keep things aesthetically pleasing. The electronic sign that administration is currently investigating may resolve some issues, however, I believe we need to segregate the the town into areas that allow signage (these being more commercial areas) and areas where our heritage “look” is more important. The appearance of signage in our heritage areas should be standardized as to create a cohesive vision.

Frank Cleminson (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided.

Peter Courtney (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided.

Pauline Gemmell (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided.

Libby (Elizabeth) Keenan (Candidate for Councillor)

I would address the signage issue by saying this. The idea of Heritage themed Business Signage is a good one to my way of thinking. It adds to the Historical and Tourism branding we are trying to acheive. however…at the regular council meeting in May/2018 it was suggested to draft a bylaw regarding this. This was not done but rather referred on for further study to a firm in London at a cost to Amherstburg of upwards of $46,000.00. As of this week the study was made available but still no bylaw drafted or enacted. In the meantime any new businesses needs be either operate without a permit using a sign they acquired to necessarily draw business and advise the public they are up and running or wait for a bylaw or word of mouth etc., etc.  Also those firms in the business of designing and marketing signs have effectively been stalled out altogether during this period of non action on the issue. So while the idea of Heritage themed signage is attractive, effectively it is not yet a bylaw , not yet a method for obtaining permits for signs to advertise and has probably resulted in notable losses for new business and signage businesses which are all ground to a crawl or complete halt waiting for a decision by council. Libby Keenan

Jason Lavigne (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided.

Lena Lazanja (Candidate for Councillor)

There is no doubt that Amherstburg is a beautiful and aesthetically appealing town. When I lived in West Windsor, weekends often consisted of “country drives” that almost always culminated in stopping for ice cream and a stroll along the waterfront in historic Amherstburg. It’s this beautification regimen, and affordable housing, that has caused a population boom as young families and retirees looking for a beautiful and safe place to live, continue to move here from all over the country.

And then there’s the reality…the true face behind the colourful mask. Disproportionate tax rates, high service charges and permit fees, underutilized or vacant properties and unkempt storefronts, and local small businesses that often do not survive the winter due to limited advertising opportunities and a tourism agenda that only serves us six months of the year. Current by-laws limit signage, whether for businesses or events, in an effort to balance public space by unbranding and ridding the town of visual pollution…understandable, but at what cost?

This has been a hot topic of debate in the past few years, where Amherstburg has attempted to untangle public infrastructure and natural landscapes from private interests. And understandably so; who would want to take a scenic country drive if the entire route is inundated with advertisement jostling for eyeballs? However, these local businesses and non-profit organizations vying for consumer attention at every intersection and main artery, are only trying to do their best to sell their wares. They are not intentionally seeking to destroy the natural landscape, and in most cases, there is some revenue generated from their applications for sign, banner, and event permits. There needs to be a balance, and a more organized way of dealing with our current advertisement architecture; ways in which local small businesses and organizations do not suffer from missed opportunity, the landscape is not hidden, and our senses are not overloaded by billboards.

Recently, the town decided to erect two digital announcement signs, on opposite ends of the downtown core. These proposed electronic signs, much like the ones at the Libro Centre and at General Amherst highschool, will potentially serve as a consolidating marketing tool for businesses to advertise in an orderly fashion in public space. Unfortunately, these digital signs only hold your attention for the 15 seconds you might have while driving by. They are not the end-all solution. Thankfully, businesses are turning to social media to find new ways to present their ads, outside of print media. In my opinion, council should focus on finding ways to support, rather than ban or limit, advertising alternatives: aesthetically-pleasing interactive sign boards (though the few boards we had placed around town years ago were useless, they can and should be resurrected); increased ad space on Town and Chamber of Commerce websites (as the past manager of the Chamber of Commerce, I understand all too well the struggles of local businesses as they attempt to cover rising advertising costs and still remain viable); a fully-staffed and completely operational Tourist/Visitor Information Center (yes, I’m talking about that underutilized, almost always closed, waterfront building on Front Road…because sorry folks, but no outsider knows where the Gordon House is!) that is open and accessible year round to help local businesses to promote themselves sufficiently and at a low cost. There are several options and I am open to hearing from local business owners on ways to improve marketability in our town. Contact me at lazanja4aburg@gmail.com www.bethechangetogether.ca     

Donald McArthur (Candidate for Councillor)

When it comes to Amherstburg’s sign bylaw, we need to take care of the small business owners who take care of us, those who have embraced the risks of entrepreneurship to invest in this town and provide jobs and services for its residents.

As a rookie political candidate looking to place lawn signs in town, I have an inkling of how important display advertising in key locations is for business owners. And I say only an inkling because my livelihood isn’t on the line.

I want to win this election very much, and I’m thinking hard about the issues and meeting as many people as I can in order to make that happen, but losing the election doesn’t mean I’ll have to shutter doors or lay off staff.

The incoming council needs to talk with business owners and see how the sign bylaw has affected their bottom line and their customer traffic. What kind of impact has it had and how could it be improved? Is there a compromise that can be reached that can address concerns about sign pollution and the ability of businesses located off the main strip to advertise?

Judging by the number of exemption requests council has had to deal with, business owners feel the bylaw is too restrictive and doesn’t give them the freedom they need to advertise their business in high traffic areas. Even organizers of the popular Ribfest were denied the opportunity to put up signs on residential and commercial properties for 28 days prior to their event instead of 14 days.

The reality is that we’re not talking about portable signs in Navy Yard Park or other parks and natural areas in the town. The bylaw was mostly meant to address the proliferation of signs along Front Road North, a busy gateway to Amherstburg for motorists coming from LaSalle or Windsor, where even the town is planning on installing a digital sign.

Concerns were raised that the signs were cluttering the landscape and had even alienated some of the judges from the Communities in Bloom competition. Maybe the signs could be moved when the judges come to town or maybe we could better control the location and look of the signs. Whatever we do, we should try and strike a balance while addressing the concerns of the small business owners who are the lifeblood of this town.

John Menna (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided.

Gregory Moore (Candidate for Councillor)

Regarding the sign bylaw recently passed i suggested that we should do everything in our power to help and encourage business. This new sign bylaw has proven to hurt business and cause several businesses to seek relief from the bylaw including Mr. Pittao and Mr. Bondy, This signage bylaw should have been further thought out before being implimented only to be compelled to give exemption to accomodate business ,at the expense of the businesses time and effort.

We need to think of our hard working taxpayers who fund our town first and foremost in an attempt to encourage new business.

Sign pollution?? I am certain that we can reach a better solution than what has been offered. Such as sign uniformity (make all of the signage fit into a basic uniform template for aesthetics). Or rotating scheduling of signage or even shared signage similiar to whats at the Windsor tunnel. None of this should prevent vendors from doing business as usual until the new procedures are actually rolled out as to not impede any current business.

Michael Prue (Candidate for Councillor)

Our waterfront is a great asset. It draws people to our town. The rejuvenation of Dalhousie, Richmond and Murray Streets are testament to the success of this great public asset. The Duffy’s property and Belle Vue will cement our appeal as a destination location.

For that reason it is essential that our sign bylaw be kept strong to ensure that there is not a proliferation of signage that would negatively impact the ambiance that visitors to Amherstburg cherish.

One of the greatest signage programs I have ever seen is in Hilton Head, South Carolina. That city ensures uniformity, limits sizes and makes the signs conform to the architectural landscape. We could do the same. Business signs for the commercial section of Sandwich Street should continue as they are.

A-frame (sandwich signs) must better regulated to ensure they do not block sidewalks. Many of our citizens have visual impairments and others have mobility issues and need motorized scooters. Parents have baby carriages. A-frames should not impair the ability of people to get around and must be kept away from foot traffic. If that is done there would be no reason to ban them.

Marc Renaud (Candidate for Councillor)

The current bylaw addresses the concern of portable signs on and near the Allied property.  The current bylaw restricts portable signs to the owner’s property with the proper permit. The by-law allows for the sign to be placed 14 days prior to an event or festival. I believe it should be 30 days with permission granted yearly as some of our festivals use portable signs to advertise.

Patricia Simone (Candidate for Councillor)

I lost count of the number of people/businesses/festivals that have appeared before council requesting variances and permission to get around the sign by-law. Obviously something is “broke” and needs to be fixed.

Small businesses in Amherstburg are the backbone of the community. They employee our residents and help keep money here in the community. We need to assist them by promoting their businesses and we need to make advertising easier for them, not harder. It’s time to review the entire sign by-law from beginning to end.

Ron Sutherland (Candidate for Councillor)

Chose not to participate. 

Lori Wightman (Candidate for Councillor)

I believe Amherstburg’s current sign by-law is too restrictive – this is evident by the number of delegations coming forward at council meetings to ask for exemptions from the by-law. Signs are a relatively inexpensive form of advertising for our local businesses and our local events and we should not be putting up barriers to the success of these groups. We should be helping them to thrive.

There are ways to still keep our streets aesthetically pleasing in the ways this bylaw does – uniformity of signs, placement of signs, time limits on signs – but with opening up the variables with longer time limits and more options of where signs can be placed that won’t damage the attendance to our businesses and/or events. Perhaps getting input from those groups would be informative as to what would work for them and still meet the goal of pretty streets.

I’m back…..I hope this has been informative to all of my readers. I hope it gives you a bit of insight into who the people are who are looking to represent us. Please note, I will send the candidates two more of your questions and publish their answers next weekend. 

 

Candidates responses to questions about Belle Vue and the Windsor Police Contract

Hello once again to all my blog followers and readers.

Well, it’s time for the third series of questions for our candidates. I must thank you all once again for the positive feedback and enthusiasm! I have heard from many of you yet again with ideas for questions and I will do my best to get as many questions answered as possible for all of you. I appreciate the candidate’s engagement towards our town. I also appreciate you, the readers and residents and your engagement with our municipal election.

I can see what my Friday nights are going to look like leading up to October 22nd, preparing the blog with the questions already asked and answered….and then sending two new questions…..rinse and repeat….but honestly, I’m really enjoying this and I know that many of you are also. I think it has provided us a wonderful opportunity to get to know the candidates and their thoughts on various Amherstburg issues.

Therefore, without further ado, here are the two questions that were asked this week to the list of candidates and their answers (in alphabetical order by position)  :

Question number 1 :  

What are your thoughts regarding the Belle Vue acquisition and it’s future?

Aldo DiCarlo (Candidate for Mayor)

Obviously I’m in support of the Belle Vue acquisition as I voted in favour of it.  In attending all of the public events in Amherstburg and talking to residents, it’s been my experience that many people still are not aware of the long term plans or objectives of the Belle Vue project.  It is not a secret that the Town of Amherstburg desperately needs a proper hotel, probably at least 2 to start. Summers are not an issue for occupancy but winters are. There are a number of hotel studies that have been done regarding Amherstburg, and most point to a need for more attraction year round.  We’ve attracted more and bigger sporting events, but the message from them regarding accommodations is usually the same. The plan for Belle Vue is not to make it another historical museum property like Fort Malden. The plan is to create a destination property with Belle Vue as a conference centre. There are many successful examples of this, the most compared to Amherstburg being Niagara on the Lake.  Yes, the entire project cost is large, but the original commitment is to not use tax dollars to develop it. I say original because it will now fall on future councils to decide whether to complete the project or sell off the land for a profit. It is NOT HMS Detroit all over again, as some would say. It is not a hull being built that has little value beyond it’s raw material. Although the property was on the market for a while, it doesn’t mean it doesn’t have value.  It is 8.3 acres of prime real estate next to Big Creek. The concept is available on line and should be reviewed. In the meanwhile, we hope to ramp up fundraising and continue to apply for government grants to complete the project. So far, funds raised are being used to replace the roof and stabilize the structure from water damage. It will likely take some time to complete, but the concept is what is drawing the interest of hoteliers to the Town, as it will provide them the missing piece for occupancy needs.  If you don’t already support the project, please ask questions and get to know how it will anchor a hotel for the Town, not to mention everything else it has to offer as an over 200 year piece of Canada’s history.

Glenn Swinton (Candidate for Mayor)

No response provided. 

Richard (Rick) Fryer (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

My thoughts around Belle Vue are pretty much the same as when the vote came to Council to purchase or not purchase?

I voted not to purchase for the most simplistic of reasons, that being it was going to take a lot of work to fundraiser and the outright purchase by the Town ultimately leaves the Town the caretakers if the fundraising doesn’t materialize.

Many many more “needs” are coming soon like a Water Treatment Plant, Road and Bridges along with many other infrastructure issues that Belle Vue unless a P3 ( Public Private Partnership) when purchased is just far beyond Councils mandate.

Leo Meloche (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

I was one of the councillors that voted against the acquisition. Reason was a financial one. I had concerns about acquiring this property on the heels of the acquisition of the Duffy property. I was not comfortable with the financial pressure of acquiring a second major property and the associated financial burden to rehabilitate the property.

It is a great property and if it would not have been on heels of the Duffy acquisition I definitely would have been in favour of acquiring the Belle Vue.

Diane Pouget (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

No response provided. 

Bob Rozankovic (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

Belle Vue has the possibility of becoming an amazing attraction, especially considering concept designs for the property. My preference would have been to have a detailed business proposal showing all proposed costs, both capital expenditures and operational expenditures, before purchase of the property. If, as Mayor DiCarlo has stated, the development will be funded through corporate and private donations, then I can support that scenario. However, after the restoration, who will operate the facility? Will it be town employees? Will the facility be competing with private enterprise for events? There are many questions still unanswered. At this point, and with known information, I am not inclined to spend any tax payer funds on this project.

Frank Cleminson (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided. 

Peter Courtney (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided. 

Pauline Gemmell (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided. 

Libby (Elizabeth) Keenan (Candidate for Councillor)

The Belle Vue acquisition and it’s future. The Belle Vue Mansion is a gorgeous and historically signifigant part of Amherstburg’s history that I feel was a good acquisition for the town. It has great potential as a future venue for a variety of social, tourist and historical events. My vision on what could be achieved with Belle Vue can be seen by following the link included. The Conservancy could benefit from exploring this project done in Brampton I believe roughly seven years ago. There is a multitude of ideas on the site, contact resources and having attended a number of events there I can truly say it is magnificient.:

https://www.bramptonguardian.com/…/5527696-alderlea-reborn-brampton-s-heritage.

     My concerns regarding Belle Vue are the pitfalls Amherstburg has fallen into in the past when attempting to revitalize parts of our history ie. The HMS Detroit. I remember excitedly watching the fund raising thermometer outside the Library just where Belle Vue’s is now. This went on for years while reports on progress become fewer and further apart, funds were misplaced, the actual existence of the ship became a matter of debate and in the end a huge scam had been perpetrated on donors and the Town alike. It’s important to me that the Town acquire independent oversight in this regard as well as very detailed reports on fundraising progress, renovation progress and all matters pertaining therein quarterly. I would very much like to seeing bidding or awarding of contracting for the renovations got to Amherstburg craftsman who would have the pride and personal conviction to put there very best efforts into the project. We have many excellent builders and various craftsmen in Amherstburg and I believe in every case possible they should get those jobs. Once the project is complete there needs to be serious consideration as to it’s management and staffing since we want to put our best foot forward. Again , I would prefer to see as many Amherstburg residents filling as many areas of operation as possible from the Official Office Management to the Interior designers to Housekeeping staff etc., etc. To conclude. Properly and carefully managed with sufficient, oversight, regular updates on progress to council, investigating all avenues of fundraising including possible government grants for Historical points of signifigance we must realize it will in all likelihood be quite a number of years before the project would pay for itself above and beyond the Town of Amherstburg’s initial  urchase price.In the end it may be worth considering a lease back of the finished premises by a firm actually in the business of running this type of facility for the Town to be able to lessen it’s liability regards cost overruns in operation and attract sorely needed investment However, if done properly and prudently it could be an amazing part of the total package Amherstburg wishes to promote on the bigger stage. Elizabeth (Libby) Keenan.

Jason Lavigne (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided. 

Lena Lazanja (Candidate for Councillor)

*I will preface my responses to this week’s questions with the following point of caution: The acquisition of the Belle Vue House, and the accepted contract from Windsor Police, are both “established” items. The town owns the Belle Vue House, and the Windsor Police contract has been approved. As such, I struggle with viewing their procurement as debatable topics for the council candidates. However, the future plans for the Belle Vue property, and the policing changes to come, are most definitely worthy of our attention, as it will be up to the incoming council to follow-up with said changes, in order to ensure that the transitions are as seamless as possible, that the residents remain informed and actively engaged, and that their voices are heard with the imminent transformations that these two items will present to our town. Let’s #bethechangetogether!

In speaking to residents thus far in my campaign, the residents are divided in their opinions on the town of Amherstburg’s acquisition of, and future plans for, the Belle Vue House. There are two main camps of thought: while one group fully supports the purchase of this historic gem as a landmark tourism site for our town, another group sees it as a drain on the town’s once damaged coffers, a building that will provide no significant fiscal benefit to the town as a whole. Although I did not initially approve of the purchase of the Belle Vue House, happening at a time when Amherstburg’s finances were already treading murky waters, I can now see the potential that this building has to offer for the future tourist and cultural expansion of our town. Only under the correct management, and with feasible and financially-sound planning, this property has the capability of becoming a prime venue (and revenue source for the town) for future weddings, corporate functions, and tourism events. If I have not made it to your door as of yet, and you would like to discuss the potential opportunities of this property, I would be happy to hear your thoughts on the future development goals of the Belle Vue House. Contact me at Lazanja4aburg@gmail.com to arrange, find me on Facebook www.facebook.com/bethechangetogether/ OR follow me on Twitter @LenaMLazanja AND please feel free to visit my website www.bethechangetogether.ca

Donald McArthur (Candidate for Councillor)

Council made the right decision when it purchased the historic Belle Vue property and now we need to consider transforming it into a destination attraction that can attract conferences and tourists year-round to help ensure Amherstburg gets the hotel development we so desperately need.

The historic building is a heritage jewel in an historic town situated on a sprawling 8.6-acre property that could play host to walking trails, greenhouses and botanical and butterfly gardens for the enjoyment of tourists and locals alike. It could be a thriving and potentially profitable meeting centre within a stunning park, attracting conferences, wedding receptions, and tour groups. It could even play host to small theatre groups. Its potential is boundless.

The town has commissioned some exciting proposals for the property and public sessions have heard it could be a thriving conference centre that could accommodate up to 400 people with break out rooms. But transforming Belle Vue into a full-fledged conference centre represents a multi-million-dollar undertaking and the incoming council will need to consult thoroughly with residents to see what kind of appetite there is to spend more public money on the project.

The Belle Vue Conservancy, with the help of generous Amherstburg residents, has been spearheading an amazing fundraising effort that had raised, by the end of May, $210,000 in cash, $18,000 in in-kind contributions and an additional $65,000 in future cash pledges. The town needs to do everything it can to help and promote those fundraising efforts while also doing everything it can to promote the property and obtain grant money and funding from conservation groups and other levels of government.

We can’t look at this project in isolation when we’re also looking at the redevelopment of the Duffy’s site down the road. We have to ensure that each development supports the other, providing as much use and as many amenities as possible. But if there’s a solid business case showing that investments now will yield dividends in the future, including a hotel development, then those public investments need to be considered.

John Menna (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided. 

Gregory Moore (Candidate for Councillor)

Chose not to participate.

Michael Prue (Candidate for Councillor)

On November 14 2016 the Town of Amherstburg purchased the Belle Vue with plans to restore this National Historic Site to its former glory.

It was made very clear by the Council that restoration monies  would not come from the taxpayers but instead would come from fundraising. A group was formed named the Belle Vue Conservancy which has to date raised over $350,000 in cash and in-kind products and services to fund the restoration. Conservancy members are all volunteers. None are paid. I am the Treasurer of the Conservancy.

Today one can witness the building as the roof is being restored with funds raised by the Conservancy and matched up to $100,000 in Federal funds. Soon the windows, soffits and other exterior will be targeted. Citizens of Amherstburg and environs have donated their money and energy in cleaning up the property.

The Town, as the owner, will determine the future use of the site but it must be a public facility available and accessible to all. As a National Historic Site, it will be visited by thousands of people and should be a key catalyst for tourism, economic development and new hotels.

I believe that a conference centre should be included in the 8.5 acre parcel to add revenue and employment in our community.

Marc Renaud (Candidate for Councillor)

The Belle Vue House is a unique piece of Amherstburg’s history. The building was completed in 1819 and was placed on the Top Ten Endangered Places list by the Heritage Canada Foundation in 2009. Amherstburg Council agreed to purchase the property in 2016 for 1.1 million dollars and I agree with council’s current position that the restoration should be funded through private funds and other grants. My position is that no further taxpayer funds should be put into the project until a business plan is presented to council that determines if the property can sustain itself financially as a wedding venue or conference center.

Patricia Simone (Candidate for Councillor)

I toured the grounds of Belle Vue during an Amherstburg walking tour with Mr. Honour years ago. During the walking tour Mr. Honour spoke about the significance of Belle Vue to Amherstburg. He spoke with such passion that as soon as I got home that evening I started researching more. According to the Directory of Federal Heritage Designations “Belle Vue was designated a national historic site of Canada in 1959 because if its outstanding architectural importance in that it ranks among the very finest pieces of Palladian architecture in Canada”.

We need to ensure the Belle Vue site remains part of Amherstburg, given its importance.  Belle Vue is a designated national historic site and adds to the rich heritage of our community. If elected to council I will look for ways to mitigate the amount of taxpayer money that is needed to restore Belle Vue and try to leverage provincial and federal grant money to restore Belle Vue.

Ron Sutherland (Candidate for Councillor)

Chose not to participate. 

Lori Wightman (Candidate for Councillor)

I think the Bellevue acquisition is a good one for the town. The concept plan of a conference/convention centre will assist in anchoring a hotel in town and will be attractive to those organizations that hold their conferences in our area or those that haven’t yet considered it, giving them an option of holding them here in Amherstburg as opposed to always going to Windsor. This will bring business to our local merchants and put a spotlight on our municipality.  The option of having a greenhouse so that the horticultural needs of the town can be self-sustaining was also broached as a possibility in the concept plans. As the renovations are being financed by donations and grants it puts no added burden on taxpayers and will, in the end, benefit them.

The fact that Bellevue has some historical designation adds to our heritage and that too will be an attraction for some.

Our town has to be forward thinking and go after the types of things that will assist in moving us to the next level growth wise and setting us apart from the rest in this region.

Question number 2 :

What are your thoughts regarding the proposed contract with Windsor Police Services for Amherstburg?

Aldo DiCarlo (Candidate for Mayor)

Policing costs for the Town of Amherstburg have been a contentious issue for some years, but it hasn’t been unique to us.  Rising policing costs have been/are a major issue across the province with AMO pushing the provincial government for solutions.  What many committed to during the 2014 election campaign, including me, was to look into Amherstburg’s options for policing. During discussions leading up to the RFP development, an added concern raised by residents wanting the cost issue addressed was that we do not see a reduction in policing levels.  Unlike other municipalities who have switched from municipal police forces, the Town developed an RFP model that would guarantee the same levels of service while hopefully reducing costs. The offer was put out to all neighbouring municipalities and the OPP. Since the OPP would not respond to our RFP model, they were excluded.  No other neighbouring municipality except Windsor responded with an offer. Since many of the details are public, I won’t repeat them here. In the end, the Windsor contract will guarantee:

• our current front line officers will be able to stay in Amherstburg for the life of the contract & will have the opportunity for advancement in Windsor if they wish
• we will save approximately $570,000 per year
• a 20 year cost structure guarantee, with 5 year renewal options for Amherstburg should we wish to opt out
• that the value of any equipment handed over to Windsor will be returned should we opt out during the 20 years
• a seat on the Windsor Police Board
• and more, too much to list here.

As well, we will be keeping the police station building, which has proven to be the biggest barrier in other municipalities going back to local policing.  The structure and guarantees built into Amherstburg’s RFP provide a bona fide option to going back, should the need arise. In the end, I believe the Town will save money that can be allocated to other needs while maintaining our level of service and our reputation of being one of the safest communities in Canada.  With the understanding that this issue remains a contentious issue for some residents, I remain committed to making the switch as seamless and transparent as possible.

Glenn Swinton (Candidate for Mayor)

No response provided.

Richard (Rick) Fryer (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

This will always be a hot topic because of the lack of information being spread and wrong media reporting ( by this I mean “ Windsor Police Takeover of Amherstburg Policing”) which is not the truth at all. Windsor bid on a contract to manage our Policing here in Amherstburg and they provided us with the same level of service if not better with our own Amherstburg Police Officers. As reported out an approximate saving year over year of $500,000. 

The message I would like the residence to have is a better understanding that this is a win / win scenario. You the ratepayer will be paying less and our officers will have a chance to further their careers (only if they choose too) doing something that Amherstburg may not offer to our Officers. The key here is not one Officer has to move to Windsor unless they themselves want to for the life of the contract.

I believe the average ratepayer won’t see a change in service delivery because our own Officers will still be here in Amherstburg doing the same great job they do day in and day out.

Thank you for the questions and have a nice day.

Leo Meloche (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

When I ran for council in 2014 the number two concern expressed by the residents was policing costs. The contract approved by council is in my opinion a good deal. The current police will still be policing our municipality. They can choose to continue their policing careers in Amherstburg or if they choose to further their career they have promotional opportunities in the Windsor organization. As for the residents they will benefit from a reduction in policing cost.

I liken this change to a change of management in an organization.

Most of us who have worked in large organizations have experienced a change in our supervisors. Our police will simply be reporting to new management. I am not naive to say there would be no changes, but as with any leadership change, change occurs.

I feel it will be a win win for the police and the residents.

Diane Pouget (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

No response provided.

Bob Rozankovic (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

Whether to contract out policing or not is a generational issue and not simply an exercise in “what is cheaper”. The public meetings that were held fully showed the depth of emotional involvement by this community with its police service. Though, by far, most speakers at the meetings preferred to maintain police service in its current form, I know there were many who preferred the switch to Windsor. Whether the majority wished to switch, or not, no one can say with certainty. And therein lies the dilemma. As I stated previously, this is a generational issue. A “one-shot” deal to get the decision right because there will not be a chance to reverse the decision at a later date. Let’s be clear, the Amherstburg Police Service will never be reconstituted. At the end of the first five-year term Amherstburg will pay Windsor whatever they ask or Amherstburg will need to contract the OPP for service.

Though I am not a proponent of referendums in most cases, I believe a this is one of those rare times. If we had submitted a request to the province by March 1st, we could have had this issue on our ballots for the October 22nd election. This would have pushed the contract start date to July 2019. A very small delay to ensure a correct decision.

There are current councilors who feel that referendums are not worthwhile, that the general public isn’t knowledgeable enough to make these decisions. I beg to differ. The general public will be knowledgeable and will be intelligently engaged if they are provided with valid information. That is particularly true for an issue such as this one. Furthermore, there are times when emotional connection is more important than saving money.

I don’t profess to know whether the majority wanted a switch or not. I do know that in door to door campaigning I am getting many different opinions.

The fact that a three to two vote, with two abstensions, decided this important issue is so sad. How could a referendum have been any worse? At the very least, council would have known the will of the people.

Frank Cleminson (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided.

Peter Courtney (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided.

Pauline Gemmell (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided.

Libby (Elizabeth) Keenan (Candidate for Councillor)

There appears to be some confusion regarding my views on this due to statement I made regarding Windsor Mayor Drew Dilken’s summary position on the contract. In essence I found Mayor Dilkens statement “to good to be true” if you will and what was really crossing my mind was and…… what’s in it for Windsor? My visceral response to the contract is no. Why? For many reasons and here a few, a feeling of remoteness from the force transplanted from another city, a concern mutually beneficial relationships and trust long developed between residents and the Police Force could be lost. A perception that a “Big City” Police Force may have trouble adapting and developing empathy for the specific policing issues we face in the Amherstburg demographic. In fact, most have of these concerns have been addressed to my satisfaction by Mayor Al DiCarlo in his many posts and statements on the matter. Granted my opposition is admittedly based on largely perceptual and emotional reservations. It appears in actuality Amherstburg will have both more resources and technology available to it’s officers than ever before. Substantial financial savings will result for the merger, I believe roughly a half million dollars per annum has been quoted. Amherstburg needs money for development, infrastructure, rural road improvements and a multitude of other items. Regarding and returning to my gut feeling on the matter I am going to take certain actions and would suggest all residents who feel the reluctance I do take these actions as well. It is my understanding that within the contract there is an 18 month out clause which applies to both parties ie. Windsor and Amherstburg. During that time (elected or not) I will be keeping a small log book. I will note in it several areas regarding performance. These will include factors such as response times, interaction between the Police Force and the residents ie. altercations more frequent or  more amicable solutions reached. Better and safer driving habits of residents or less? More charges laid/month or less? Do I feel safer walking the streets at night or any other time or less safe. Do I feel I receive fair and respectful treatment from officers in either an incident I am involved in or not? Do I feel my rights are respected etc., etc. which of course can be adjusted to each person’s own concerns. In this way approaching the 18 month mark we will have reliable recollections of our experiences, consolidate our reports, present to Council and indicate to Council if we feel the issue needs to revert ie. utilize the “Out” clause or indeed if the situation seems to be working out satisfactorily for the majority of residents. I do also have some reservations about the renewal o the contract which I believe would be due in five years, these concerns of course refer primarily to price increases and fees from the City of Windsor to the Town of Amherstburg however I have currently no way of knowing how much of a fiscal risk that represents to residents. In summary I would suggest Amherstburg proceed with the contract for the obvious and substantial fiscal savings yet remain mindful of value and quality of service being provided and while keeping an open mind use the intervening time period between now and the out clause 18 month utilitization point to assess their final reactions to the switch after actually seeing it in practical operation.Elizabeth (Libby) Keenan

Jason Lavigne (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided.

Lena Lazanja (Candidate for Councillor)

*I will preface my responses to this week’s questions with the following point of caution: The acquisition of the Belle Vue House, and the accepted contract from Windsor Police, are both “established” items. The town owns the Belle Vue House, and the Windsor Police contract has been approved. As such, I struggle with viewing their procurement as debatable topics for the council candidates. However, the future plans for the Belle Vue property, and the policing changes to come, are most definitely worthy of our attention, as it will be up to the incoming council to follow-up with said changes, in order to ensure that the transitions are as seamless as possible, that the residents remain informed and actively engaged, and that their voices are heard with the imminent transformations that these two items will present to our town. Let’s #bethechangetogether!  

The switch from Amherstburg to Windsor policing is another issue that has, unfortunately, divided our town. Much of the commentary circulating amongst our residents for the past year (and beyond) has been negative and contentious, with many not understanding why cost-savings were not being sought elsewhere; why we couldn’t afford our policing but could afford purchasing buildings & properties; why a change was necessary in the first place?

I admit that I fell into that group, one that did not see the cost savings alone as reason enough to have made the switch to the Windsor Police Service. I would gladly pay more for any service that is of highest calibre, policing & emergency response especially. Add to that my concerns and questions over the improper procedure with which this contract was negotiated and finalized, and my caveat feelings were compounded (in my opinion, the public were not adequately represented throughout the entirety of this process, and even the divided council’s decision itself, rested on one person’s vote…but, such is council procedure). My concern, first and foremost, was with regard to the quality of service we are accustomed to in our town (something which, in my opinion, is exceptional and has no price tag worth bartering over).

However, I have since read the contract and I see now that much of our current service is reported to remain the same, with the only main difference being that of new management. Not being a Windsor resident, I know very little of this new management team and its techniques, making it deceitful and irresponsible of me to decide that it must be worse without witnessing it first-hand. If our high quality of service remains paramount, then I am even for a cost savings. I am agreeable to giving it a try. I am not a person who is resistant to change, and I am willing to see what the next 5 years will bring. Although it is easy to be fearful of the unknown, I am willing to embrace the change and watch… very carefully, in order to determine whether or not another 15 years should be committed. If I have not made it to your door as of yet, and you would like to discuss the future changes to our police service, I would be happy to hear your thoughts. Contact me at Lazanja4aburg@gmail.com to arrange, find me on Facebook www.facebook.com/bethechangetogether/ OR follow me on Twitter @LenaMLazanja AND please feel free to visit my website www.bethechangetogether.ca

Donald McArthur (Candidate for Councillor)

I’ve been knocking on doors and the reaction to the policing issue is definitely mixed. Some residents raise it while others emphasize different issues, like flooding, taxes, water rates or the speeding cars that zip down their street.

Some residents support the switch as a sound fiscal move that will save the town $600,000 per year and help avoid future costs, like $2.8 to $3.9 million in post-retirement benefits. Others view regional policing as an inevitability, coming, sooner or later, to small municipalities everywhere, as it already has to Tecumseh, Lakeshore, Leamington, Essex and Kingsville.

Those who oppose the switch have doubts the deal will live up to what’s been promised or they have a genuine attachment to a responsive, local force that has served this community so well for so long. Some are leery because there was effectively only one bidder while others are worried because of past disciplinary issues involving Windsor officers, not to mention an investigation into allegations of nepotism and a poisoned work environment.

But residents haven’t been telling me we should rip up the agreement just a few months after council voted for it. They’re telling me we have to move forward and do everything we can to make sure this deal works as promised for Amherstburg because, by and large, they’re quite happy with the policing services they get now.

Amherstburg police officers are a valued and integral part of our community. They organize a popular bike rodeo and Christmas toy drive. They’re our friends and neighbours. That shouldn’t change with the switchover and, if everything unfolds as administrators have predicted, we shouldn’t notice much of a change at all.

Amherstburg officers will continue patrolling our streets in distinctively marked uniforms and cruisers and they will only be transferred to Windsor if they choose, to pursue promotions or jobs with specialty units – units the town will now be able to access with a “significant” reduction in wait times.

The town will have a spot on the Windsor Police Services board to ensure our concerns are dealt with at the highest level and cost increases are locked in for the first five years with cost parity with Windsor’s budget assured after that.

Our force will benefit from an infusion of technology predicted to “increase the efficiency of the present service and enhance officer and resident safety” and Amherstburg residents will have access to online crime mapping data.

We’ll also have access to the COAST team to respond to an increase in local mental health calls, which nearly tripled between 2013 and 2016, and our two-officer traffic unit will have access to six new radar guns and a dozen more officers to crack down on speeders.

And we still have the option to opt out in five years if the savings and service levels aren’t there. I think it makes the most sense to move forward and only opt out if and when we determine the deal isn’t working as promised for Amherstburg residents.

John Menna (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided.

Gregory Moore (Candidate for Councillor)

Chose not to participate.

Michael Prue (Candidate for Councillor)

The Town of Amherstburg Council has signed a contract to utilize the City of Windsor Police Services,  in effect doing away with our local services as a separate entity.

It was a very contentious issue. I attended two of the public meetings and spoke at one of them. It was my position, then and now, that the people of Amherstburg should be heard and should have services delivered locally and controlled locally if that is their wish.

Council, in a three to two vote with two abstentions, voted for the Windsor proposal. The rationale largely hinged on perceived long term savings. The contract will run for twenty years, reviewable every five years. In 2024 this issue will be before the next Council which will have an opportunity to judge service levels, financial savings, successes and failures of the program.

This incoming Council should be vigilant in its observations but the contract is legal and must stand. Seeking to end the provisions would cost millions of tax payer dollars; there are always penalties in breaking contracts and we cannot afford to take this route.

If the decision made by the current council needs review we must wait until 2024, wherein the choice should be made by the citizens of Amherstburg and the Council of that day.

Marc Renaud (Candidate for Councillor)

I was present at the four information sessions and Joint Police Advisory Committee meetings and I have a strong understanding of the plan to allow Windsor Police to take over the policing in our community.

Of course, I had concerns about who will be policing our community, the collective agreement of our officers and the leadership of the Amherstburg police. The agreement allows for our officers to stay in Amherstburg, if they wish, protects their collective bargaining rights and offers Chief Berthiaume a leadership position to ensure continuity of our police services.

There is no question that the agreement will be a savings of around $580,000 a year to our taxpayers. A savings that can used to improve our roads, parks, and other community services.

I understand that people have strong feelings about the change, but I believe the correct decision was made by council with the information presented.

Patricia Simone (Candidate for Councillor)

Having served on the Amherstburg Police Services Board for the past eight years, as board member, chair, and vice chair, I can say that I have learned a lot about an organization that plays a vital role in our community.

My thoughts on the policing issue have been public. I have spoken in regards to the issue at the council meeting in February and the OCPC public hearing in June. Current council has voted on this issue and OCPC has approved the request for Windsor to take over services in Amherstburg.

The following are my personal thoughts on the policing issue:

• Only 5 members of council voted on this important decision. Once council learned that not all members could take part in this important vote,this decision should have been delayed until after the election. This would have forced candidates to campaign on their ideas surrounding policing, and would have left Council with a clear mandate from our residents. Instead, we had a divided Council, with our Mayor breaking a tie vote.   
• The Amherstburg Police Service is progressive. We have been fortunate enough to have a Police Chief who has vision and conviction for his community. Together with the Police Service and the Police Services Board, Amherstburg became one of the first communities to outfit their officers with body warn cameras and non-lethal shot guns. The cameras are now positively mentioned by judges for the different vantage point they are able to provide for court cases. In my opinion, I feel we are going to lose these forward thinking advancements when we switch to Windsor Police.  It’s great to see that Amherstburg’s chief understood the importance of innovation a long time ago.
• Currently, we have our own board that serves the needs of Amherstburg alone. Amherstburg will no longer have a Police Services Board. Amherstburg will be represented by one voice on the Windsor Police Services Board.
• One of the main reasons given by council for the switch is the savings. In the 2018 Town budget that council discussed earlier this year, the Police Department had a decrease in budget of $132,000, while other departments in the Town increased (one department by over $100,000). Our policing is important and we could find savings in other areas.
• My main concern is the environment we may potentially be placing our officers. There is currently a human rights complaint against the Windsor Police Service and recently we learned of other numerous complaints against Windsor Police Service, including sexual discrimination, nepotism and failing to accommodate personnel. If these claims are substantiated it indicates that Windsor is antiquated and treats its employees poorly. I feel that the outcomes of the complaints will have an impact on this contract. If Amherstburg policing moves to Windsor, we will be following Windsor policy and procedures. We need to ensure that we are putting our officers in an environment that is fair and has equal opportunity for all. If we are putting the officers in an unfair work environment this is not adequate and effective for the officers and/or residents.

Ron Sutherland (Candidate for Councillor)

Chose not to participate. 

Lori Wightman (Candidate for Councillor)

I understand this is a somewhat contentious issue to some with a lot of misinformation floating around, so I preface my answer with these details: I attended a public consultation meeting, read the transcripts of the others, I’ve read the Amherstburg Police Department business plan, the JPAC committee findings, the comparison from MPM Consulting, the CAO’s report, the Collective Agreements of both APD and WPD and the results from the Talk the Burg survey and the random phone survey. I’ve talked about this proposal with a number of people directly affected and a large selection of residents. I have followed countless debates online.

Policing costs for small municipalities are rising and many are struggling to meet these increasing expenditures. This proposal allows us to get ahead of the problem, address it and save the municipality money that can then be directed elsewhere. Since our Request for Proposal was so detailed we are getting the same servicing levels which means we will have the same police officers doing the same jobs in the same way they have always been done. Plus we get the added services, technology and training. Our officers now have more opportunity for advancement – if they choose. The contract has an out-clause so that if we are not happy with the deal we can reverse it with us returning to what we had before. The only detraction is that we will no longer have a full police board but instead have a member on the WPD board.

All of this with savings to our municipality of almost $600,000 per year, an estimated $14 million over the course of the 20 year contract.

For all these reasons, my personal opinion is that it is a good deal, one that meets the best interests of our municipality. I have yet to hear any solid, fact-based reasons against it but would be open to listening to the views of residents who think differently.

I believe that we should closely monitor our police services going forward to ensure that we get what we pay for but for now I think we have to respect the decision of council and move forward.

I’m back…..I hope this has been informative to all of my readers. I hope it gives you a bit of insight into who the people are who are looking to represent us. Please note, I will send the candidates two more of your questions and publish their answers next weekend. 

 

Monday August 13th Regular town council meeting

Well, tonight’s meeting was relatively boring, so this blog probably will be too. There were several recorded votes and some frustration expressed, but, well, you can tell that the electioneering is in full swing. However, it looks like Amherstburg lost the Wendy’s development…..read on…..

DELEGATIONS

Print-to-Braille Accessibility for Municipalities – Emmanuel and Rebecca
Blaevoet, Tactile Vision Graphics

Ms Blaevoet presented about her company that can take anything that is in printed format and convert it to braille in order for the visually impaired to be able to read it. She said they can convert any print into braille, including pictures, maps, charts, tickets, business cards, agendas etc. She felt that people that have a visual impairment are an under served segment of the population. She said when people think of accessibility, they often think of physical challenges (walkers, wheelchairs etc) and forget about people that have a visual impairment need accessibility too. I was very impressed by her informative presentation and council seemed to be too. Finally, a motion was made for administration to come back with a recommendation and a report about converting council agendas into braille. This carried.

Tom and Suzana Siimes- Concerns with the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment for 6136 Concession 6 N, Part of Lot 2, Concession 5  (supplementary agenda)

This delegation had been added on a supplementary agenda. Ms Siimes spoke and explained how she and her family moved to Amherstburg for peace and tranquility. She was opposing the application of her neighbour for a zoning by-law amendment to allow for a dog kennel. She felt that the application was not accurate and that many changes were made without permits. The neighbour is looking to put in a dog kennel and seems to offer aggressive training for large breeds of dogs. It was quite clear that council sympathized with Ms Siimes (so did I), the situation seems pretty bad. There was a lot of back and forth about permits, or lack thereof, ERCA concerns, drainage concerns etc. Ultimately, council chose to deny the zoning by-law amendment, but I got the impression that if they had approved it, they would have had site plan control over the property. It seems that the property owner in question owns 24 dogs. If you live in the rural part of Amherstburg, it seems the number of dogs you can own is unlimited. When the town has site plan control over a property, they are in a position to get involved with exactly what’s going on on the property. However, now that council has voted to not get involved (by denying the zoning by-law amendment), they do not have a legal basis to deal with the owner and how many dogs he owns……Ultimately, council voted unanimously in a recorded vote to deny the zoning by-law amendment, but I can’t help but wonder if they may have been better off to approve it, in order for site plan control to take effect and give the town legal recourse against the property owner…….or maybe I’m reading this wrong?? The CAO and Mr Galvin spoke a few times in round about ways that site plan control allows the town get involved and control what is going on on a property……I do know for sure that I sympathized with the Siims family and what seems to be a less than desirable dog kennel business next door.

Vanessa and Eric Jaber – Request to perform a blessing at King’s Navy Yard Park (supplementary agenda)

This delegation was on the supplementary agenda. Mr Jaber’s father spoke to represent the couple since they were unable to attend. He was requesting permission to use the Navy Yard Park for a short 15 minute ceremony with about 20 people in attendance. This passed quickly.

Development Charges Deferral Agreements

Council has to make a choice about the development charges that it defers for the developers.  They have two options:

Option A: Development Charges be collected in accordance with
DC By-law 2014-101 effective August 22, 2018.
OR
Option B: The practice of offering Development Charges
Deferral Agreements BE CONTINUED and those Agreements
include the terms outlined in this report for security, interest and
financing administration fee.

Mr Bolger addressed council. He was looking to continue the bylaw development deferral agreement. There was some back and forth of questions but ultimately, council decided to approved option B and ending the agreement on December 31, 2018. There will be a report forthcoming after the election. It went to a recorded vote but was passed unanimously.

Amending Development Agreement for 83 Sandwich Street South

So, this is what I wrote in my pre-meeting blog : “This looks to be some more approvals for the new Wendy’s restaurant to be built near Sobey’s. It looks like all the approvals are in, including ERCA’s, so this should probably be a go.” Well, I was wrong. (I‘m sure my husband will take a screen shot of this…..it doesn’t happen often that I’m wrong LOL )

This item didn’t get discussed, there was an immediate motion for deferral. For those that don’t know the rules of order, once there is a motion for deferral, there is no more discussion allowed (although there seemed to be a bit of sniping among a few members of council who are seeking re-election…..maybe…..) It went to a recorded vote …..Motion to defer the amending development agreement for 83 Sandwich street South :

Support : Councillor Courtney, Deputy Mayor DiPasquale, Councillor Lavigne, Councillor Meloche, Councillor Pouget

Opposed : Councillor Fryer, Mayor DiCarlo

At this point, Mr Mikhail stood up and said to council, angrily, that they won’t be back. So right then, right there, no Wendy’s for Amherstburg. I’m going back on my memory from council meetings past…..but I seem to recall Mr Mikhail had gone before the Heritage Committee to ensure the new building would fit the property standards and the heritage look. I seem to recall him speaking to council about how he was happy to be back dealing in Amherstburg, after long years of negative publicity…….I seem to recall, that most people in town were pretty excited to be getting a Wendy’s. Well, now it looks like we’re not going to get a Wendy’s after all…..I can only suggest talking to the 5 members of council who voted to defer this and ask them why we lost out on a new restaurant and more tax money.

The rest of the meeting was relatively uneventful, a few small items were discussed but not much of excitement. There won’t be another council meeting until September now, which will allow me some time to concentrate on my Q&A series with the candidates.

So, with that I’m signing off with a “see you Friday night with the next set of answers from our candidates.”  🙂

 

Candidates responses to questions about Council meeting attendance and the Duffy’s development

Hello once again to all my blog followers and readers.

First, thank you so much for all of the positive feedback! I can see that many of you loved the question and answer blog to the candidates and so many of you have reached out to me in various ways. I really appreciate that! Many of you have also offered questions or ideas for questions and I’ve noted your suggestions and will do my best to get as many questions answered as possible for all of you. I am thrilled with all of the positive feedback and I think the candidates are also!

Therefore, without further ado, here are the two questions for this week and our candidates answers! Enjoy!

Here are the next two questions that were asked this week to the list of candidates and their answers (in alphabetical order by position)  :

Question # 1 :

How many council meetings have you attended during the past 4 years? How do you think that relates to your potential candidacy?  OR

If you’re an incumbent, how many council meetings have you missed during the last 4 years? How do you think that relates to your potential candidacy?

Aldo DiCarlo (Candidate for Mayor)

I believe I missed one meeting in 2016 and one meeting in 2017.  In 2015 I believe I missed a couple of meetings due to an accident.  I believe this confirms my commitment to the position of head of council, and the need to be present.  As well as town council meetings, I attended almost all county council meetings and subcommittee meetings of both councils that I was a member of.  The role of mayor requires a huge commitment of time if done to its fullest, and I believe I’ve proven this. There is also many festivals, events and special occasions that the mayor is invited to, and/or expected to attend.  I also attended almost all of these as well, barring any conflicting events or illness. I believe I have proven my commitment to representing the town in this regard.

Glenn Swinton (Candidate for Mayor)

No response provided. 

Richard (Rick) Fryer (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

No response provided. 

Leo Meloche (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

Missed one meeting due to the death of a family member. I have always taken my commitment to serving the public seriously.

Diane Pouget (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

No response provided. 

Bob Rozankovic (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

I believe I have only missed 3 regular council meetings since the 2014 municipal election. For any candidate to be taken seriously there needs to be a demonstrated desire to know and understand procedures at council and have an understanding of council’s interaction with administration. I have also attended all Amherstburg Police Service Board meetings as a board member during this same time frame. I have attended as many Town Hall meetings as possible to understand residents’ views.

Frank Cleminson (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided. 

Peter Courtney (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided. 

Pauline Gemmell (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided. 

Libby (Elizabeth) Keenan (Candidate for Councillor)

Chose not to participate.

Jason Lavigne (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided. 

Lena Lazanja (Candidate for Councillor)

I have attended numerous council meetings over the past four years, and over the course of the 12 years I have lived in Amherstburg. Though I do not have an exact number (I wasn’t keeping track) I have attended both as a concerned resident, and as a delegate for a variety of issues, as related to my role as past Rotary Club President, past Manager of the Chamber of Commerce, and as a part of the Royal Canadian Legion Branch 157 Executive.

Though I believe that candidates having attended council meetings is important, in order to further their understanding and knowledge of town issues and procedure, I do not believe that the number of meetings attended is a reliable indicator of a candidate’s preparedness and competency to serve the community.

Donald McArthur (Candidate for Councillor)

I didn’t attend any Amherstburg council meetings over the past four years, but, as a journalist, I read the agendas and reports and I assigned the reporters and photographers who did cover those meetings, along with the issues and controversies that sprang out of them. (Like the time council met in-camera and you and other watchdogs were asked to shuffle outside before being allowed to stay warm in the vestibule at Town Hall.)

I also regularly read your blog — I wouldn’t have been doing my job as a journalist if I hadn’t — and I’m grateful to you and reporters like Ron Giofu from the River Town Times for going to all those meetings, asking all those questions and poring over the minutiae of all those reports, synthesizing them and putting them into context for me and thousands of other Amherstburg residents. Covering council meetings can be a grinding, thankless job, but it’s a vital and necessary one.

I’ve been a journalist for most of my professional life, first at the Windsor Star and then at CBC Windsor, and journalists have to be very mindful of real or perceived conflicts of interest and from endorsing or supporting various causes or candidates. They can’t speak as delegates at council meetings, write letters to the editor, or weigh in publicly on issues. Journalists have to “stand alone,” said Liev Schreiber as Boston Globe Editor Marty Baron in the movie Spotlight, in order to perform their vital democratic watchdog role.

Now that I’m no longer a journalist, I’m beginning to understand how my skills and experiences can be used to support causes and issues I believe in, including the grassroots bid to save Camp Bryerswood from closure so that it can continue enriching the lives of local kids. For the first time in my professional life, I am now free to take sides and sign petitions and run for political office. It still feels a little strange and frightening, to be honest, but I just want to be myself, meet with residents and enjoy and learn from the experience.

The reality is that most people have jobs and other commitments and don’t have the time to attend council meetings even if they were inclined to do so. That’s why journalists and citizen bloggers are so important, but it’s also why council and councillors must do everything they can to inform and engage with residents, not just during the election campaign but the four years following it.

If I’m elected, I will attend as many meetings as possible and I will strive to keep the public informed and engaged. I will ask my colleagues to support the Live Streaming of council meetings and I will actively use social media and my website to discuss the issues and connect with residents. I will post my voting record online and send out a newsletter to those who opt to sign up and receive it.

John Menna (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided. 

Gregory Moore (Candidate for Councillor)

Chose not to participate.

Michael Prue (Candidate for Councillor)

During the past four years I have attended about a dozen Council meetings. Each Council week, I obtain an agenda to see what will be debated and go to the meetings which contain items of interest.

I have made deputations before Council on several topics including the budget, Belle Vue and proclamations. I have also participated in fora concerning the police issue, the future use of Belle Vue and downtown core development.

I believe all citizens should be encouraged to take an active role in the civic life of Amherstburg.

Marc Renaud (Candidate for Councillor)

I believe it is important to stay informed on the issues that affect the residents of Amherstburg. Over the last four years, I have attended almost every council meeting.  I have a strong understanding of the issues and concerns that come before council regularly. Additionally, I regularly attend committee meetings, including the property standards committee and the joint police advisory committee. This knowledge and experience will help me serve my community more effectively as councillor. I will have the background knowledge to ask tough questions and demand answers for the residents of Amherstburg.

Patricia Simone (Candidate for Councillor)

I frequent town hall, follow what is happening regularly, however, I am not sure how many council meetings I have attended over the last four years. I have never kept track.  

For meetings I cannot attend I make sure to read council packages, follow the council meeting on twitter (RTT and other news outlets reporting from meeting), read the blog on Amherstburg Election Project facebook page and speak to councillors if I have a question in regards to something that was presented at council.

I think it’s important to be engaged in the community and understand all that is being discussed at council meetings.

Ron Sutherland (Candidate for Councillor)

Chose not to participate. 

Lori Wightman (Candidate for Councillor)

I’ve been to approximately half of the council meetings in the past 4 years. I usually familiarize myself with the agenda every week and make sure to read the minutes if I missed a meeting. I also make sure to read this blog as it gives an easy to understand synopsis for those who can’t make a meeting.

I think my attendance and/or dedication to reading the materials makes me a good candidate – I’m aware of the workload involved in being on council and I’m already familiar with many of the issues and procedures in which council participates. Of course there will still be a learning curve but it won’t be as steep so I can hit the ground running.

Question # 2 :

What are your thoughts regarding the Duffy’s property and it’s future development?

Aldo DiCarlo (Candidate for Mayor)

Regarding the prior Duffy’s property, there is a concept plan that is being discussed.  More importantly than my thoughts on the development are the thoughts of the residents. I have heard from a strong majority of residents that are in favour of the concept plan as presented.  It will expand on the Navy Yard Park, adding an active use area for more and/or bigger festivals, as well as a much needed/wanted fishing pier and wharf, and a transient marina. It seems the only feature in question is the boat ramp, or lack thereof.  Most residents I’ve heard from do not want the boat ramp in the final plan, especially due to the issue of boat trailers. There is a group of residents that I’ve heard from that do want a boat ramp in the plans, but with any development in town, the majority should prevail.  I have heard from a very small number of residents who were opposed to the purchase of the Duffy’s property outright. For those in favour, they have also been anxious to finish the development as soon as possible, and so am I, with consideration for available funding. In the end, I believe the property will prove to increase Amherstburg’s reputation as a tourist destination, bring in and/or sustain new business, and therefore add tax income to the town.  With the addition of a hotel, the downtown waterfront property should become the envy of other municipalities.

Glenn Swinton (Candidate for Mayor)

No response provided.

Richard (Rick) Fryer (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

No response provided.

Leo Meloche (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

The acquisition of the Duffy was key given that there is limited waterfront property available in the core area. It is a key strategic move that will anchor the south end of the Kings Navy Yard Park. Based on residents I’ve spoken to, they are interested in seeing an ‘active’ park developed on the property that would compliment the more ‘passive’ intent of the Kings Navy Yard Park.

Diane Pouget (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

No response provided.

Bob Rozankovic (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

The Duffy’s property was an excellent investment on the town’s part and current proposals for its’ development are excellent and seem to address the wishes of the majority of residents. Creating a Festival Plaza will allow for an active park while the remainder of KYNP can be maintained as a passive area. A transient marina will certainly enhance Amherstburg as a potential stop for boaters, which in turn will provide opportunity for local merchants and restaurants. Hopefully another spin-off is that these boaters, having enjoyed our town in the summer, will come back in the fall and winter by driving here.

Frank Cleminson (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided.

Peter Courtney (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided.

Pauline Gemmell (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided.

Libby (Elizabeth) Keenan (Candidate for Councillor)

Chose not to participate.

Jason Lavigne (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided.

Lena Lazanja (Candidate for Councillor)

On Wednesday, I, like many of my fellow candidates, attended the public “drop-in” centre regarding the proposed plans for the Duffy’s property, and I spoke at length with a representative from Landmark Engineers Inc. (the design firm charged with the EA & proposed site plans). We were presented with a board displayed slide show of beautifully-mapped out design options to be available on the town website today). There was no presentation. Only a feedback sheet was provided for our comments, should we wish to share, for public record. And a projected timeline, one that sees the finalized plans coming to fruition as early as November 2018. To my dismay, there was nothing on the accepted plan (Option C, for those who were in attendance) that would ensure a steady revenue stream to our town coffers. If anything, I saw a potential threat to our future fiscal stability due to the foreseeable maintenance costs of said plan, especially without seeing any flexibility or commitment for small business development or tourist shops on the actual property. Perhaps this is a possibility that our next council can consider.

Donald McArthur (Candidate for Councillor)

I was a cub reporter for the Windsor Star back in 1999 when developer John Oram staged a lavish press conference at the corner of Park and Dalhousie Streets, promising a $60-million development complete with a 50-suite luxury hotel and a 107-slip boat dock.

Twenty years later, we’re still waiting. My father came to visit me a month ago for my daughter’s 9th birthday and he wound up staying in a hotel on Dougall Avenue in Windsor. 

Amherstburg desperately needs a hotel if we are to maximize our tourism potential, and our best bet to land a hotel is to ensure we transform the Duffy’s property into a welcoming, inviting space capable of hosting concerts and events.  

I want it all — an amphitheatre, a transient marina, a wharf for expanded shoreline fishing and a boat launch with parking — but it’s my understanding we can’t have it all, that we have to choose. I’m definitely open to creative suggestions — a smaller launch, say, with a valet service — but if we have to choose, then I would opt against the full-fledged boat launch and parking lot.

Here’s why:

•   Amherstburg has unrivalled potential to become a tourism hotspot, but we need a hotel to maximize the benefit, to ensure tourists stay here for more than a few hours, spending more money in town eateries and shops. A boat launch and parking lot won’t be as alluring to a hotel developer as a signature civic space capable of hosting concerts.
•   There are already multiple private sector boat launches in town and, as a general rule, I don’t believe the public sector should compete with the private sector unless the public sector is providing an essential public good like an arena or sports fields.
•    The AMA Sportsmen Association makes a passionate case for the need for a public boat ramp in the event those private sector operators go out of business. But does that launch need to be in the heart of a downtown that can play host to festivals and attract tourists from across Windsor and Essex County and beyond? Is a boat ramp the highest and best use of that piece of prime real estate or does it make more sense to put it somewhere else?
•   We need to maximize our transient marina space so we can bring back the boats of yesteryear and build the buzz, maximizing the ways that visitors can access our town and our businesses.
•    A good friend recently went to Leamington and enjoyed a concert in the town’s new amphitheatre. He and his wife bought dinner and went shopping in Leamington stores beforehand. There’s no reason that disposable income, and the income of thousands of others, couldn’t be spent in Amherstburg if we build an alluring attraction on the former Duffy’s site as a companion to the other passive parks already in the downtown core.

John Menna (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided.

Gregory Moore (Candidate for Councillor)

Chose not to participate.

Michael Prue (Candidate for Councillor)

There was little debate about the purchase of Duffy’s. Council purchased it as a strategic investment waterfront property. It is now a municipal property awaiting development.

Preliminary plans have been drawn up but will require many modifications. A boat docking facility could bring many potential visitors to town. The proposed fishing pier is a good idea but Council should also explore he possibility of rebuilding the old Boblo pier just south of downtown for that urpose.

In the final analysis it will come down to the monies available. Unlike with the purchase of Belle Vue, no group has come forward to raise the large amounts of dollars required to build a spectacular site. And this in   turn will not happen until Council undertakes the necessary consultations to determine its format. Once this occurs I am confident private and charitable monies will be forthcoming. I do not sense a great public appetite for using scarce tax dollars.

Marc Renaud (Candidate for Councillor)

I attended the public meeting with regarding Duffy’s redevelopment on August 8. I believe that it should be a space for all of the community to use. I am inclined to support at this point the proposal that includes the development of an amphitheater, spaces for community events, as well walking trails. I would like to see council secure government grants to fund the redevelopment.

Patricia Simone (Candidate for Councillor)

I support the redevelopment of the old Duffy’s property with consultation from residents.  

Ron Sutherland (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided.

Lori Wightman (Candidate for Councillor)

I think the Duffy’s property encompasses some of our most beautiful waterfront, property that should rightfully be put on display. It has huge potential to be a draw to our municipality. The aspects of the project proposed so far I believe could bring a number of positive changes to our community. I attended the public input meeting on August 8th and the concept drawings were beautiful and the reasoning behind each element was sound.

We need look no further than Leamington to see the success of their ampitheatre. Their summer concert series and Windsor Symphony Orchestra performances are certainly a draw for their municipality and ours could do that as well. It would be nice to also be able to support and promote our local artists on a hometown stage. A marina to host transient boaters allowing tourists who may not otherwise have stopped in our town to come ashore and partake in our restaurants, our shops and our parks will boost our local economy. I see it as a way to increase the quality of life for our residents, attract outside interests and future residents to our town, and boost business for our local merchants. If we are prudent and careful with the consideration and implementation of the  plans I see no reason why it can’t be a win for all.

I’m back…..I hope this has been informative to all of my readers. I hope it gives you a bit of insight into who the people are who are looking to represent us. Please note, I will send the candidates two more of your questions and publish their answers next weekend. 

 

In preparation for Monday August 13th Regular town council meeting

Well, the agenda is only 293 pages for this upcoming meeting, so that means two things. One, maybe the meeting won’t be too long. Two, maybe this blog won’t be too long either LOL. I also have to get the blog of Q&A with our candidates ready for tonight. I have a really busy weekend ahead, so I’m hoping to have it all ready for everyone very shortly. Anyway, here are the highlights as I see ’em for Monday night :

DELEGATIONS
Print-to-Braille Accessibility for Municipalities – Emmanuel and Rebecca
Blaevoet, Tactile Vision Graphics

There’s not much detail on the form for the delegation, so I’ll have to listen closely and see what this is all about. I’ll let you know.

Development Charges Deferral Agreements

Council has to make a choice about the development charges that it defers for the developers.  They have two options:

Option A: Development Charges be collected in accordance with
DC By-law 2014-101 effective August 22, 2018.
OR
Option B: The practice of offering Development Charges
Deferral Agreements BE CONTINUED and those Agreements
include the terms outlined in this report for security, interest and
financing administration fee.

Also, administration is seeking direction from council in order to prepare a policy regarding deferred collection of development charges.

This should make for some interesting discussion. Deferring development charges has been ongoing for quite some time in Amherstburg and is a practice that’s seen in many municipalities.

Encroachment Request – 1644 Park Avenue

It seems that a couple recently purchased a house. A portion of the existing shed on their property encroaches on the town’s road allowance. The owners would like to keep the existing shed, however, they need to enter into an encroachment agreement with the town. This seems to be something that happens from time to time. It seems the shed has been there for 50 years. Administration is recommending to enter into the encroachment agreement, so I don’t foresee this to be a big deal, but who knows?

Amending Development Agreement for 83 Sandwich Street South

This looks to be some more approvals for the new Wendy’s restaurant to be built near Sobey’s. It looks like all the approvals are in, including ERCA’s, so this should probably be a go.

Clarification on Statutory Public Meeting for a Zoning By-Law
Amendment at 6136 Concession 6 N, Part of Lot 2, Concession 5

This item appears to be about a contentious issue that was discussed at the last planning meeting. It has to do with a property on the 5th Concession that is looking to build a dog kennel. Again, council will have to make a choice between :

Administration BE DIRECTED to summarize the comments
received at the public meeting held on July 23, 2018, and that
Zoning By-Law 2018-74 BE CONSIDERED at a future Regular
Council Meeting.
OR
Council DOES NOT SUPPORT the Zoning By-Law Amendment
to By-Law 1999-52 pertaining to the property

From the report : “At the present time, the Zoning application is in abeyance, as no direction has been given to Administration to proceed to bring the matter back to Council. As a decision of Council has not been made, no party can appeal the lack of decision until such time as 150 days has expired, in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act. The lack of moving the “Be Considered” portion of the recommendation to Council, provides a degree of uncertainty for the application until such time as the statutory time period has elapsed, essentially with Council rendering ‘no decision’ on the matter.”

Parks Master Plan Draft for Approval

From the report : “The preparation of a Parks Master Plan is an opportunity to determine the role parks play in the future development of the community. Beyond planning for individual park spaces, a Parks Master Plan can help shape the Town of Amherstburg and improve the quality of life for residents and visitors. The Parks Master Plan establishes the Town’s priorities for improving its parks, open space and trail network over the next ten years and should be used as a guide to achieve such results. The purpose of the Parks Master Plan is to assess parkland inventory and future levels of service, identify opportunities for physical improvements to existing parks and new park amenities and to solicit public input on the proposed concept for the recently purchased Duffy’s lands.”

The Parks Master Plan Draft was presented to council to allow for their input and public input. From the report : “Establishing a Parks Master Plan will guide Council and administration toward a shared vision for improvements, uses, acquisitions, dispositions and planning of park projects in the Town of Amherstburg based on community input. ” All in all, the hard work has been done, the studies complete, the input provided, many meetings to discuss it all and now it’s time for approving the Parks Master Plan Draft form. The Plan provides guidance and sets the course for future decisions. The town would not be bound to implement every single recommendation, nor provide services based on an order or time line, however the plan will help guide council with their future decisions regarding park land.

I’ve already read through the plan. It’s very detailed and comprehensive, if you haven’t had the chance to take a look, here’s the link to the agenda. It’s a great read!

Click to access 2018%2008%2013%20-%20Regular%20Council%20Meeting%20Agenda%20Packet.pdf

Tha Parks Master Plan starts on page 85.

And then to finish the meeting, council will go in-camera to discuss :

SPECIAL IN-CAMERA COUNCIL MEETING
That Council move into an In-Camera Meeting of Council directly following
Regular session pursuant to Section 239 of the Municipal Act, 2001, as
amended, for the following reason:
Item A – Portion of 7860 County Road 20, s/t Malden Firefighter’s Association –
Section 239(2)(c) – A proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by
the municipality or local board.

This will be council’s first “lame duck” meeting since it’s now election season and nomination day has passed. I’m not sure if that will have an effect or not on how the meeting goes or any commentary. I guess I’ll know after Monday night.

Candidates responses to questions about social media

Hello to all of my blog followers and readers.

During the past few weeks many of you have approached me with questions about the candidates. Often I did not know the answers you were seeking. Therefore, I decided to use my blog as a communication tool for our current municipal election. I have sent all of the candidates (Mayor, Deputy Mayor and Councillor)  two questions. Below you will find the questions I asked for you and I have then directly copied their answers from their email replies into the blog. I hope that this will be informative and will help people get a better sense of who their candidates are in order to help you with your voting decision.  Should you have any questions directly for the candidates as individuals, I encourage you to contact them directly. I have about 14 questions ready (that have come from my various conversations with you, the residents), however, should you have any ideas for future questions, feel free to message me, email me or talk to me, as you’ve already been doing. I am hoping for this to be a positive experience for the candidates and for us, the residents and voters.

Here are the first two questions that were asked to the list of candidates and their answers (in alphabetical order by position)  :

Question # 1

During your election campaign, how do you intend to use social media if at all? (examples, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, blog, web site etc….)

Here are their replies to this question…

Aldo DiCarlo (Candidate for Mayor)

I already use most forms of social media and plan on continuing to do so.  Specific to the campaign, I intend on using social media for messaging and communication.

Glenn Swinton (Candidate for Mayor)

No response provided. 

Richard (Rick) Fryer (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

No response provided. 

Leo Meloche (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

In response to question #1, social media is a good tool to target a certain segment of our residents.

Facebook has been my choice to reach out to the public. Face to face conversation although an onerous task has been my method of choice talking to residents about the issues that concern them. Many appreciate the effort and the ability to talk to candidates.

Diane Pouget (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

No response provided.

Bob Rozankovic (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

Facebook will be the only social media I’ll be using as it provides a ready made audience for my message and provides the quickest opportunity for residents to connect with me.

Frank Cleminson (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided.

Peter Courtney (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided. 

Pauline Gemmell (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided. 

Libby (Elizabeth) Keenan (Candidate for Councillor)

Chose not to participate.

Jason Lavigne (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided. 

Lena Lazanja (Candidate for Councillor)

Social media is a powerful tool. Allowing immediate access to boundless information, the internet has provided me with a great campaigning resource to discuss current topics of interest with the residents of our town and beyond. However, social media apps present a double-edged sword effect, where many discussions can quickly turn heated, hurtful, and negatively charged, which is not a progressive way to communicate with my constituents. While I welcome healthy debate and constructive feedback, my approach to using social media has always been a positive one; “if you haven’t anything positive or productive to say, say nothing at all”.

Also, there are many residents who either do not have access to social media, or are not able to effectively navigate through today’s technology. For these reasons, I am not limiting my campaign voice exclusively to the internet, as I believe face-to-face discourse is equally as important.

I began my campaign with a website in order to share up-to-date candidacy information with our electors, and receive critical feedback & communication from those I have yet to speak to. (www.bethechangetogether.ca)

I am also active on Twitter under @LenaMLazanja

#bethechangetogether

And Facebook under the profile name “Lena Lazanja Amherstburg Town Council”

https://www.facebook.com/bethechangetogether/

I welcome anyone to follow my campaign progress by reaching out to me online by visiting my website or social media pages, or by contacting me via e-mail at Lazanja4aburg@gmail.com

Donald McArthur (Candidate for Councillor)

Thanks again for doing this. It’s a great idea!

Social media is an excellent platform to get my message out, but, more importantly, it’s an exceptional vehicle for voters to connect with me, to ask me questions and let me know how they feel about the issues.  

Social media isn’t just about amplifying your own message. It’s about listening as well. It’s about empowering voters and making politicians accessible and accountable in real time.

I’m active on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram and find them to be very effective community engagement tools. There are no barriers to entry save for having a computer or phone with Internet access, which fosters an open and inclusive forum for discussion and debate. Anyone can engage with me or ask me questions at any given time.

My social media handle is @captainbyliner, a tip of the hat to the two decades I spent as a journalist covering the stories of Windsor and Essex County residents. Please give me a follow!

My campaign website, located at www.donaldmcarthur.com, is engaging and interactive. Voters can volunteer, sign up for email blasts and participate in surveys on the issues. I will post press releases and my platform as the campaign progresses and I will also maintain a blog about my experiences in the community and on the campaign trail.  

I believe very passionately in the people and potential of Amherstburg. We have a storied past and a boundless future. We need to build the buzz and share our amazing story on as many social media platforms as we can.

Please follow me on Twitter and Instagram @captainbyliner and please visit my website at www.donaldmcarthur.com. Thanks! Go Aburg!

John Menna (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided.

Gregory Moore (Candidate for Councillor)

Chose not to participate.

Michael Prue (Candidate for Councillor)

Thank you for the opportunity to respond to these questions.

My campaign outreach will be a combination of many lines of communication including face to face conversations, signs, literature and advertisements in the  River Town Times as well as email.

In addition I will use social media through Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. These accounts are in development and will be opened soon. I can be reached at this email address and will establish links to the social media components when they are developed.

Marc Renaud (Candidate for Councillor)

Facebook is a great way connect with Amherstburg residents. I plan to use my Facebook page as a way to share my platform, provide campaign updates, encourage voter turnout and highlight events in the community.

Patricia Simone (Candidate for Councillor)

I currently use social media accounts personally and plan to release my campaign social media sites once I release my platform.

Ron Sutherland (Candidate for Councillor)

Chose not to participate. 

Lori Wightman (Candidate for Councillor)

Great questions! I’d be happy to participate. Social media will be a big part of my campaign.  I have my campaign Facebook page: Lori Wightman for Amherstburg Council, my Twitter: @LoriWightmanAmh and a newly set up Instagram: lori_wightman_amh. A website and/or blog may be in the pipeline as well. I think it’s important to understand that many people today get their news and information through social media. If you really want to be in touch with what those around you feel and think about the issues you have to put yourself where they are – and there are almost two full generations who grew up with the internet as their interaction tool. That being said, there is still plenty of room for good old-fashioned face to face communications. If you want to represent all, you have to be willing to listen to all, in whatever way they choose.

Question # 2

If you’re elected, how do you intend to use social media, if at all?

Here are their replies to this question…

Aldo DiCarlo (Candidate for Mayor)

If I’m re-elected, I plan on continuing to use social media as I have for the last 3 and 1/2 years.  That would be to advertise town events, share event photos and information, advertise meetings, development, communicate through private messaging, etc.  Anyone wishing to see how I use social media can simply find me on any platform they wish. I’m on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Linked In and Snapchat.

Glenn Swinton (Candidate for Mayor)

No response provided.

Richard (Rick) Fryer (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

No response provided.

Leo Meloche (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

We live in a time where social media is becoming more important in our communicating with everyone. The younger generation has embraced social media and we will all have to adapt to this method if communication over time. What is lost in this method of communication however is body language, the unspoken words that can be just as important as the words themself.

Diane Pouget (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

No response provided.

Bob Rozankovic (Candidate for Deputy Mayor)

Again, Facebook would the primary media but should enough constituents desire it, Twitter is certainly an option. The key is still to communicate with as many residents as possible on many issues as possible.

Frank Cleminson (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided.

Peter Courtney (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided.

Pauline Gemmell (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided.

Libby (Elizabeth) Keenan (Candidate for Councillor)

Chose not to participate.

Jason Lavigne (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided.

Lena Lazanja (Candidate for Councillor)

I believe that my communication with the residents of Amherstburg does not cease with a ballot count. Upon election to the role of Councillor, I will continue to maintain my social media links (in accordance with Town-directed guidelines) in order to continue a proactive dialogue with my fellow residents. During my tenure, I would actively seek feedback from my constituents regarding current issues and areas of concern, and my social media platforms would provide an important forum for such discourse. Also, as some of my contact information may change following the election results, my social media pages will be updated to reflect those changes, thereby keeping the lines of communication open with my fellow residents.

Donald McArthur (Candidate for Councillor)

I will continue using social media when I’m elected in the same manner I am now. I will use it to communicate and engage with voters, I will use it to promote and celebrate our beautiful town of Amherstburg and I will use it as a listening tool, following and amplifying the posts of the town and our vital community groups.

As a former journalist, I’m very committed to open and transparent government and will use social media and my website to promote awareness and accountability. I will continue blogging about community happenings and council news on my website and I will post my voting record online. I will send out a regular newsletter and encourage voters to sign up and receive it. On specific issues, I will post survey questions and invite voters to participate.  

My goal as a councillor will be to listen to my constituents and promote the town. Social media provides an exceptional and engaging way to accomplish that. It’s no substitute for face-to-face contact and real conversation, but it provides a vital, digital connection between a councillor and constituents.  

The more ways I have to get my message out, and the more ways voters have to connect with me and ask me questions, the better.

Please follow me on Twitter and Instagram @captainbyliner and please visit my website at www.donaldmcarthur.com. Thanks! Go Aburg!

John Menna (Candidate for Councillor)

No response provided.

Gregory Moore (Candidate for Councillor)

Chose not to participate.

Michael Prue (Candidate for Councillor)

If I am elected, I will set up a website and revamp the Facebook, Twitter and Instagram accounts to stay in contact with constituents. I will also make myself available for personal discussions for required interventions on municipal matters.

Marc Renaud (Candidate for Councillor)

If elected, Facebook will be a great tool of transparency and accountability for our taxpayers. I intend to use it to keep residents updated on issues and decisions that come before council.

Patricia Simone (Candidate for Councillor)

If elected I’ll use social media accounts to promote Amherstburg.

Ron Sutherland (Candidate for Councillor)

Chose not to participate.

Lori Wightman (Candidate for Councillor)

Social media is a wonderful tool for informing, promoting, educating and communicating. I’d like to keep residents in the loop of the goings on of council through any or all of my social media and the sharing of those of others. My Facebook page, as always, will promote our town and all its fantastic events, our local businesses and our accomplished citizens. It’s one surefire way to attract people and business to Amherstburg.  I’d also like to use it to ensure that the correct information is put out to the public and that residents understand the how and the why of council actions and know that they can contact me through whatever medium and expect an answer in a timely manner – whether it be Facebook, email or phone. I pledge that residents will always get a quick response from me. Thanks and I’m looking forward to the next set of questions!

I’m back…..I hope this has been informative to all of my readers. I hope it gives you a bit of insight into who the people are who are looking to represent us. Please note, I will send the candidates two more of your questions and publish their answers next weekend.